Market regime is firmly BEAR (100% probability, 100% confidence) with 9-day persistence and very high BEAR->BEAR continuation (0.98). Macro signals are consistent with risk-off: elevated VIX (26.15) and weakening consumer sentiment (UMCSENT 56.4 vs 71.7 prior-year) alongside a still-tight policy stance (Fed funds 3.64%).

Restrictive/holding: Fed funds at 3.64% with CPI still positive (CPI YoY 2.66%), implying policy is not yet clearly easing enough to drive a broad risk-on turn.

Moderating but not broken: CPI YoY at 2.66% suggests inflation is cooling versus prior peaks (not provided), but remains high enough to keep real rates and discount rates elevated.

Mixed-to-slowing but not collapsing: GDP YoY 5.42% is strong, unemployment is rising (4.4% vs 4.0% prior-year), and jobless claims are ticking up (205k vs 208k prior month—slightly improving, but labor is not clearly strengthening). Yield curve is not inverted (T10Y-2Y spread +0.49%), reducing recession signal severity, yet the BEAR regime and VIX keep downside risk elevated.

Explanation: Risk-off BEAR tape and elevated VIX (26.15) typically compress high-multiple growth/tech allocations; however, GDP strength (5.42%) provides some offset.

Explanation: Rate-sensitive headwind: Fed funds 3.64% keeps financing costs elevated, and consumer sentiment is weak (56.4). Housing starts are positive (HOUST +9.5% YoY), but the broader demand confidence backdrop is deteriorating.

Explanation: Grid/energy is supported by infrastructure demand and the AI-power narrative, but BEAR regime and risk aversion (VIX 26.15) can still pressure capital-intensive equities.

Explanation: Relatively insulated from the business cycle, but still affected by risk appetite; with BEAR regime, investors may demand more selectivity even if geopolitical spending remains supportive.

Explanation: High-beta/speculative profile tends to underperform in BEAR regimes; elevated VIX (26.15) and risk-off positioning are direct headwinds despite any long-run innovation tailwinds.

Explanation: More defensive than pure tech, but still equity-risk sensitive; weak consumer sentiment (UMCSENT 56.4) and BEAR regime modestly pressure multiples.

Explanation: Crypto is liquidity/risk-appetite sensitive; BEAR regime with elevated VIX (26.15) is a strong headwind, and the macro backdrop (weak sentiment) increases drawdown risk.

Explanation: Defensive/hedge themes benefit in risk-off markets; despite BEAR regime, elevated VIX (26.15) can increase demand for stability, though weak consumer sentiment limits broad “quality rally” strength.

VIX at 26.15 signals elevated tail risk; in a BEAR regime this can rapidly widen risk premia and pressure high-duration themes (ai_compute, quantum, crypto_digital).

Labor-market softening risk: unemployment at 4.4% (up from 4.0% prior-year) combined with rising risk sentiment can deteriorate consumer demand further (UMCSENT 56.4), hurting rate-sensitive and discretionary-adjacent exposures (real_estate).

Inflation persistence risk: CPI YoY 2.66% keeps policy restrictive (Fed funds 3.64%), sustaining higher discount rates even if growth remains strong (GDP 5.42%).

Summary: Macro is consistent with a persistent BEAR regime: elevated VIX (26.15), weaker consumer sentiment (UMCSENT 56.4), and a still-restrictive Fed (3.64%) create broad risk-off pressure. Net effect: strongest headwinds for crypto and speculative/high-multiple themes (crypto_digital, quantum, ai_compute), moderate headwinds for real estate, and comparatively better relative performance for defensive/hedge themes.

Arm Rises on Plan to Sell Own Chips With Meta as Anchor Customer

Arm's Big AI Chip Move With Meta Sends Stock Soaring

ARM Stock's Momentum Score Leaps Fueled By In-House AGI Chip Ambitions

OpenAI Set to Discontinue Sora Video Platform App / won't support video functionality inside ChatGPT

'America Will Win The AI Race—But Only If…:' Mike Johnson Pushes Deregulation

Google Accelerates Quantum Timeline: New Dual-Track Strategy Aims For 2030 Commercial Breakthrough

Xanadu Set For Market Debut As Quantum Computing Stocks Struggle In 2026

The Bull Case For IonQ Could Change Following New Global Quantum Partnerships And Cambridge Hub

IonQ's Revenue Just Tripled to $130 Million

Honeywell Sign Supplier Framework Agreement With U.S. Department Of Defense; commits $500M for production capacity upgrades

Anduril, Palantir Are Developing Golden Dome Missile Shield’s Software

Northrop Stock Drops After President Trump Post. Why Defense Still Can’t Catch a Break.

3 Defense Stocks To Replenish America’s Depleting Arsenal

Uranium Energy down after wider losses, while U.S. fuel chain push advances

Why HC Wainwright Sees Uranium Energy Well Positioned for a Bigger Production Ramp

Bear Of The Day: First Solar (FSLR)

Bitcoin sinks below $70,000 as Bernstein analysts say token 'looks bottomed'

Strategy Seeks $44.1B Capital Raise to Expand Bitcoin Holdings Amid Market Downturn

Why these three ‘narrative barriers’ pose clear risks to the Strategy Bitcoin scheme

Merck To Acquire Terns Pharma For $53/share in cash

CRISPR Therapeutics balances CASGEVY momentum with early pipeline uncertainty

How Investors May Respond To CRISPR Therapeutics $550 Million Convertible Note Boost To Cash Reserves

Mark Cuban backs bill to break up big medicine giants UNH, CVS, CI

D.R. Horton shares falling as Middle East tensions raise inflation and slowdown concerns

D.R. Horton: Buy, Sell, or Hold Post Q4 Earnings?

Foreign Investors Hold $36 Trillion in U.S. Assets. High Oil Prices Might Make Them Sell.

Treasuries and Other Government Bonds Will Keep Selling Off, BlackRock Says

Fed- Flying Blind Even BEFORE War Broke Out

Arm entering direct AGI CPU sales with Meta as anchor customer (Bloomberg, Benzinga)

Anduril/Palantir Golden Dome software highlights AI-defense convergence (WSJ)

OpenAI discontinuing Sora/video support narrows AI monetization breadth at the application layer (Benzinga/WSJ)

Material evolution from the prior session’s 'value capture narrowing' story: AI leadership is concentrating even further into infrastructure and sovereign/mission-critical stacks. Arm’s move from neutral IP supplier to direct chip vendor with Meta suggests the stack is vertically integrating, while OpenAI’s retreat from video reinforces that not every AI modality will monetize equally. The story is becoming 'own the compute/control layer, not broad AI exposure.'

D.R. Horton weakness tied to inflation/slowdown fears from Middle East tensions (StockStory)

Recent DHI coverage remains valuation-focused rather than demand-reacceleration focused

Oil/inflation spillover risk remains a headwind for rates-sensitive housing (Barrons)

UEC advancing U.S. fuel-chain vertical integration despite near-term losses (Simply Wall St.)

Analyst support for uranium production ramp (Insider Monkey)

Solar narrative remains weaker, with First Solar failing to benefit from higher oil (Zacks)

Honeywell-DoD framework plus $500M capacity upgrade commitment (Benzinga)

Golden Dome software consortium led by Anduril/Palantir points to software-defined defense procurement (WSJ)

Broad defense beta still not cleanly responding to geopolitics, with NOC mixed on de-escalation headlines (Barrons)

This strengthens yesterday’s subtle shift: defense is no longer just a war hedge; it is becoming an industrial-policy and software-platform story. Capacity agreements and program-specific software wins matter more than generic conflict escalation. Market leadership inside defense is likely to skew toward dual-use, AI-enabled, and supply-chain-secured names rather than the whole sector rising together.

Google accelerates commercial quantum timeline toward 2030 (Benzinga)

IonQ partnerships and revenue growth support early commercialization narrative (Simply Wall St., Motley Fool)

Xanadu IPO arrives while public quantum equities struggle, showing financing appetite despite weak tape (IBD)

A real story change is emerging: quantum is moving from 'speculative science project' toward 'staged commercialization with credible platform roadmaps,' led by incumbents like Google rather than only retail-favored pure plays. The weak performance of listed quantum names alongside stronger strategic milestones suggests a narrative/price divergence, but this is still early and not yet broad-based.

Merck’s Terns acquisition signals large-cap appetite for external biotech innovation (Benzinga)

CRISPR retains commercial and pipeline momentum, supported by fresh capital (Simply Wall St.)

Policy noise around healthcare middlemen is notable but not directly changing biotech narrative today

Bitcoin below $70k but sell-side argues bottoming process is underway (Yahoo Finance, Investing.com, Decrypt)

Strategy’s $44.1B raise extends treasury-buying model despite drawdown (Coinspeaker)

Narrative barriers around Strategy model show institutional skepticism is rising (DLNews)

BlackRock/Barrons warns Treasuries may keep selling off on inflation from oil, chips, defense spend

Fed uncertainty and oil-shock transmission weaken confidence in classic duration hedges

Income commentary is rotating from bonds toward dividend substitutes, implying defensive leadership is fragmenting

AI infrastructure is converging with defense procurement: Golden Dome and Honeywell-DoD capacity expansion favor software-defined, compute-intensive national security stacks.

Industrial policy is linking defense and energy_grid through domestic supply-chain resilience narratives: rare earths, uranium conversion, and production capacity matter more than pure commodity beta.

There is a growing divergence between strategic milestone flow and market performance in quantum and crypto: narratives are improving selectively, but price action remains skeptical in the current bear regime.

Oil/inflation/geopolitical spillovers continue to pressure both real_estate and defensive assets, undermining the usual assumption that defensives automatically hedge macro stress.

Summary: Narrative tone remains cautious in a persistent bear tape, but two story changes stand out. First, AI is narrowing further toward infrastructure ownership and mission-critical deployments: Arm’s direct chip push with Meta and defense-AI software wins reinforce that value capture is concentrating in compute/control layers, not broad AI exposure. Second, defense is evolving from a simple geopolitical hedge into an industrial-policy and software platform theme, where program-specific winners matter more than sector beta. Quantum also shows an early positive narrative/price divergence as commercialization timelines improve despite weak stock performance. Real estate and classic defensives remain pressured by the same oil-to-inflation transmission channel, while crypto’s bottoming narrative is still too dependent on leveraged treasury-style demand rather than organic broadening.

Despite a hostile BEAR macro, AI has a genuine narrative upgrade: value capture is concentrating into the compute/control layer, and Arm’s direct chip move with Meta is a meaningful narrative shift. Defense-AI convergence via Golden Dome adds a second demand vector. Quantitatively, theme momentum is still positive on average (6m +16.35%, 3m +6.94%) with roughly flat relative strength, which is enough confirmation that leadership remains intact in select infrastructure names.

Macro is still a headwind for long-duration growth, with elevated VIX and restrictive policy likely to compress multiples. Breadth is uneven: several major names have negative 6m/3m momentum and weak relative strength, while volatility is elevated (44.3%) and some constituents carry meaningful drawdowns, especially SMCI. This is a selective infrastructure story, not a broad AI beta call.

Short-term price action has improved, with 3m momentum at +12.06% and some resilience in REIT/materials names like O, SPG, MLM, and TOL. Housing starts in macro are not collapsing, so there is at least a tactical rebound case if rates stabilize.

The macro and narrative both remain clearly negative. Real estate is one of the strongest macro headwinds (-0.55), and the narrative still points to inflation/slowdown pressure and weak housing demand confidence. Relative strength remains negative (-2.06), and prior session already cut conviction on a worsening story. With no real narrative improvement, repeating another increase would be unjustified.

The structural story remains attractive: AI power demand, uranium/fuel-chain localization, and grid modernization still support the theme. Quant signals are decent on average (6m +10.38%, 3m +9.33%, RS +0.84), with standout strength in UEC and GEV. Macro headwind is only mild (-0.15), so the long-term thesis is still alive.

This sleeve remains too risky to press in a persistent BEAR regime. Volatility is very high (62.35%), concentration is elevated, and SMR remains an acute risk leak with extreme VaR, volatility, and drawdown. Prior sessions explicitly vetoed increases here on risk grounds, and those conditions have not improved enough. Mixed narrative tone, especially solar weakness, also argues for patience.

This is the cleanest bullish setup in the book. Macro is nearly neutral (-0.05), narrative has a positive shift toward industrial-policy and software-defined defense, and quant confirmation is strong: 6m momentum +19.99%, 3m +16.24%, RS +12.37, with solid Sharpe across most names. Honeywell’s DoD framework and Golden Dome software winners reinforce that this is evolving into a durable procurement/platform story, not just a war hedge.

The sector is not uniformly strong; PLTR is the obvious risk leak with negative momentum, high volatility, and elevated portfolio drawdown. Narrative also says broad defense beta may not work as well as program-specific winners, so selectivity matters. In a BEAR tape, even resilient sectors can get de-risked if market stress deepens.

Quantum has one of the more interesting positive narrative shifts: commercialization timelines are becoming more credible, led by incumbents like Google, and the story is improving from pure speculation toward staged platform adoption. That kind of narrative/price divergence can be an early signal for future upside, especially from such a low current conviction base.

This is exactly the kind of theme the current regime punishes. Macro impact is clearly negative (-0.35), 3m momentum is deeply negative (-17.57), relative strength is very weak (-22.6), volatility is extreme (67.56), and concentration is too high (HHI 0.3061). Prior vetoes explicitly blocked increases in speculative sleeves, and those risk conditions remain unresolved. The narrative is better, but price has not confirmed it.

Biotech has modestly constructive narrative support from M&A appetite and continued innovation in CRISPR/cell-gene platforms. Macro headwind is only mild (-0.1), and the group has some defensive growth characteristics that could help if investors rotate toward idiosyncratic catalysts rather than broad beta.

Quant confirmation is lacking. Theme momentum is mixed-to-soft (3m -3.33%), relative strength is poor (-12.94), and several key names have weak Sharpe or negative trend. Narrative is positive but not a true shift, so there is not enough evidence yet to push conviction higher in a BEAR regime.

There is at least a tentative bottoming narrative around Bitcoin, and extreme pessimism can sometimes set up reflex rallies. At a floor conviction of 1, the theme is already de-emphasized, so there is little need to press further unless conditions worsen materially.

Macro, narrative, and quant all still point the same way: down. Macro impact is the worst in the set (-0.7), momentum is extremely weak (6m -50.71%, 3m -26.0), relative strength is poor, volatility is extreme (71.58), concentration is excessive (HHI 0.3061), and realized portfolio drawdowns are already severe, especially COIN and MARA. Prior session already cut this sleeve, and nothing has improved enough to revisit.

In a persistent BEAR regime, this remains the most natural ballast candidate. Macro is the only positive theme impact (+0.2), and quants are strong: 6m momentum +22.83%, 3m +14.92%, RS +8.14, low volatility (18.76), and limited portfolio drawdowns. Even if the classic bond hedge is imperfect, staples/gold/quality defensives are still behaving like relative winners. Prior veto specifically cited defensive conviction being too low for this regime.

The narrative is not clean. Defensive leadership is fragmenting, Treasuries may continue selling off, and the old duration-hedge playbook is less reliable in an oil/inflation shock. This means the sleeve should be viewed as selective quality/gold ballast rather than a universally effective hedge.

Bullish-leaning analyst with a preference to add conviction when narrative shifts and quant confirmation align, but current persistent BEAR regime forces selectivity and limits increases to the most resilient themes.

Summary: I am selectively pro-risk despite the bear tape, but only where narrative change and quant confirmation are both visible. Defense & Aerospace is the strongest add: it has a real positive narrative shift, strong momentum, strong relative strength, and relatively contained macro sensitivity. AI & Compute also earns a modest increase because the narrative has improved meaningfully around infrastructure ownership and sovereign/mission-critical demand, though breadth remains uneven. Defensive should also be lifted because prior vetoes explicitly flagged insufficient ballast, and the quant profile is strong even if the narrative around bonds is imperfect. I am holding Energy & Grid, Quantum, Biotech, Real Estate, and Crypto unchanged: in each case either macro/risk conditions remain too hostile, prior veto conditions have not improved, or narrative strength lacks sufficient price confirmation.

Macro headwind remains negative in a persistent BEAR regime (impact_score -0.25), which is unfavorable for high-multiple growth exposure.

Theme average volatility is 44.3%, elevated for a 25% max-allocation sleeve.

Several constituents breach the 3% daily VaR threshold: NVDA -3.74%, AMD -5.37%, AVGO -4.13%, TSM -3.50%, SMCI -7.54%, ASML -3.72%, AMZN -3.05%.

Risk is uneven internally: SMCI has -66.18% historical max drawdown, -7.54% daily VaR, and negative 6m momentum (-30.01%).

Actual losses from entry are not yet severe at theme level, but GOOG (-3.28%), MSFT (-2.68%), META (-1.84%), and AMZN (-1.38%) show the sleeve is not immune in this tape.

This sleeve faces one of the strongest macro headwinds in the book (impact_score -0.55) due to restrictive rates and weak consumer sentiment.

Theme average relative strength vs SPY is negative (-2.06), indicating underperformance despite decent 3m bounce.

Multiple names exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold: DHI -3.46%, LEN -3.84%, TOL -3.13%, AMT -3.10%, RKT -5.36%.

AMT portfolio drawdown is -3.48%, the worst in-theme realized loss, while the sleeve is rate-sensitive in a still-restrictive Fed backdrop.

Several risk-adjusted returns are weak or negative: LEN Sharpe -0.604, SHW -0.409, AMT -0.907.

Theme average volatility is 62.35%, well above a moderate-risk sleeve standard.

Several names have extreme daily VaR: CEG -4.67%, FSLR -5.45%, SMR -9.90%, UEC -7.05%, GEV -4.43%, all above the 3% threshold except NEE.

SMR remains the key risk leak: 105.69% volatility, -9.90% daily VaR, -78.61% historical max drawdown, and -2.31% portfolio drawdown.

Macro impact is only mildly negative (-0.15), but this is not enough to offset the sleeve's internal volatility and tail-risk profile.

Current conviction is 5 despite a moderate risk tolerance and 15% max allocation, which is aggressive given the sleeve's realized risk profile.

This is one of the stronger sleeves on momentum and relative strength, but it is not risk-free in a BEAR regime.

PLTR is the main internal risk source: 57.58% volatility, -5.69% daily VaR, and -3.77% portfolio drawdown.

Theme concentration HHI is 0.1834, acceptable, but conviction is already high at 7 with a 12% max allocation cap.

Macro impact is only mildly negative (-0.05), making this a relative safe haven, but selectivity matters.

Theme concentration HHI is 0.3061, above the 0.25 concentration-risk threshold.

Theme average volatility is 67.56%, extremely high.

Theme average 3m momentum is -17.57% and average relative strength vs SPY is -22.6, showing weak momentum under strong macro headwinds.

Daily VaR is extreme in the speculative names: IONQ -8.18%, RGTI -8.78%, IBM -3.16%.

Historical drawdown profile is severe: IONQ -62.93%, RGTI -73.59%.

Macro headwind is strongly negative (impact_score -0.35) and combines with weak momentum for a double flag.

Theme average relative strength vs SPY is -12.94 and 3m momentum is negative (-3.33), indicating weak participation.

Theme average volatility is 44.38%, high for a moderate-risk sleeve.

Several names breach the 3% daily VaR threshold: LLY -3.59%, NVO -4.70%, CRSP -6.17%.

Risk-adjusted returns are weak across key names: NVO Sharpe -1.094, ISRG -0.269, ABBV 0.023.

Macro headwind is mild (-0.10), but weak momentum and poor relative strength make this sleeve vulnerable.

Theme average volatility is 71.58%, extremely high, with all constituents above 54%.

Theme momentum is decisively negative: average 6m -50.71% and 3m -26.0%.

All names breach the 3% daily VaR threshold by a wide margin: COIN -6.58%, MSTR -7.61%, MARA -8.31%, XYZ -5.27%.

This sleeve has the worst realized losses from entry in the portfolio: COIN -9.76%, MARA -7.41%, XYZ -2.09%, MSTR -1.41%.

Historical drawdown profile is severe: MSTR -76.53%, MARA -70.53%, COIN -66.39%.

Macro headwind is the worst in the book (impact_score -0.70), and it is aligned with collapsing momentum for a clear double flag.

This is the strongest ballast sleeve for the current regime, with positive macro impact (+0.20), positive relative strength (+8.14), and the lowest theme volatility (18.76%).

No constituent breaches the 3% daily VaR threshold; worst is GLD at -2.54%.

Portfolio drawdowns are minimal across the sleeve: KO -0.59%, PG -0.58%, JNJ -0.06%, TLT -0.44%, GLD 0.0.

Some internal Sharpe readings are weak (PG -0.847, TLT -0.746), so ballast quality is mixed rather than perfect.

Crypto & Digital realized losses are worsening versus prior sessions: COIN portfolio drawdown is now -9.76% (vs -9.20% to -10.44% range previously flagged) and MARA is -7.41%, confirming ongoing capital impairment.

Energy & Grid SMR remains a high-risk position with -2.31% portfolio drawdown, 105.69% volatility, and -9.90% daily VaR; prior risk condition has improved slightly on drawdown but not on structural risk.

Defense & Aerospace PLTR remains the main leak in an otherwise stronger sleeve at -3.77% portfolio drawdown with -5.69% daily VaR.

Real Estate AMT remains under pressure at -3.48% portfolio drawdown in a sleeve facing the strongest rate-sensitive macro headwind.

No theme appears close to breaching its theme-level max_drawdown limit based on current realized portfolio drawdowns, but crypto_digital is the clearest active capital-impairment pocket.

Summary: Risk posture stays defensive. Portfolio risk is elevated to veto territory because the macro regime is persistently BEAR, prior veto conditions remain unresolved, and the highest-beta sleeves still combine concentration, extreme VaR, and worsening realized losses. The main problem areas are crypto_digital, quantum, and energy_grid; real_estate and biotech_health also warrant caution. Defense_aerospace is relatively resilient but should not be increased aggressively from an already high conviction. Defensive exposure should be at least 5 conviction in this regime. No conviction increases should be approved this session; only reductions, exits, or hedges are justified.

Summary: VETOED: Portfolio-level risk remains in veto territory. The market regime is firmly BEAR with 100% confidence, 9-day persistence, and 0.98 BEAR->BEAR continuation. Prior veto conditions have not improved materially: speculative sleeves remain over-concentrated (quantum HHI 0.3061, crypto_digital HHI 0.3061 > 0.25), multiple themes still breach the 3% daily VaR threshold, energy_grid still carries extreme single-name risk (SMR 105.69% vol, -9.9% daily VaR), and realized capital impairment is worsening in crypto_digital (COIN portfolio drawdown -9.76%, MARA -7.41%). Defensive conviction at 4 is still too low for this regime, so no conviction increases should be approved this session.. Only conviction decreases applied.

Summary: Vetoed session with no conviction changes. No trades.


Market regime is firmly BEAR (100% state probability; 0.98 BEAR->BEAR continuation, 9-day persistence). Macro risk is consistent with a growth scare: unemployment is rising (4.4% vs 4.0% prior year), consumer sentiment is weak (UMCSENT 56.4 vs 71.7 prior year), and VIX is elevated (26.15), even though the yield curve is not inverted right now (T10Y2Y spread +0.49%).

Fed is effectively restrictive/holding policy tight: fed funds at 3.64% alongside only moderately cooling inflation (CPI YoY 2.66%). With unemployment drifting higher and sentiment down, the stance is likely “higher-for-longer” until inflation is clearly on track.

Inflation appears contained but not collapsing: CPI YoY 2.66% is near target-ish, yet still high enough to keep real rates restrictive. This supports a cautious view on rate-sensitive risk assets and limits aggressive duration/risk-taking.

Growth looks resilient on the surface (GDP YoY 5.42%), but the labor/consumer side is deteriorating (UNRATE 4.4%, UMCSENT down materially). Jobless claims are easing slightly (205k vs 208k prior month), but the overall mix suggests late-cycle fragility rather than clean acceleration.

Explanation: BEAR regime with elevated VIX (26.15) is a headwind for high-beta tech capex narratives. While GDP is strong (5.42%), risk-off conditions and tighter financial conditions typically compress multiples for compute infrastructure until volatility falls.

Explanation: Rate sensitivity is directly challenged: fed funds 3.64% and risk-off sentiment (UMCSENT 56.4) weigh on housing demand. Housing starts are positive (HOUST +9.5% YoY), but the broader consumer/labor deterioration suggests the rebound may not fully offset financing/affordability pressure.

Explanation: Manufacturing/employment conditions are not clearly supportive (MANEMP level provided but no directional change), and BEAR risk appetite reduces appetite for long-duration infrastructure. However, the inflation/AI-power theme can retain some structural demand, limiting the downside versus pure cyclicals.

Explanation: Defense is relatively macro-insensitive, but BEAR tape and elevated VIX still pressure equity risk premia. With consumer sentiment weak and unemployment rising, investors may rotate within defense toward more specific winners rather than broad beta, making the macro tailwind modest.

Explanation: Quantum is high-risk/high-multiple and typically suffers in BEAR regimes with elevated volatility (VIX 26.15). Even with GDP strength, risk-off conditions tend to delay speculative commercialization narratives.

Explanation: Biotech has some defensiveness via secular demand, but it still trades like growth/optionality and is vulnerable to risk-off. With unemployment rising and sentiment down, funding/valuation conditions likely remain a mild headwind.

Explanation: Crypto is liquidity/risk-appetite sensitive and is strongly pressured by BEAR regime and elevated VIX (26.15). Additionally, prior-session context indicates ongoing capital impairment in the sleeve (e.g., COIN drawdown ~-10% range), consistent with macro-driven de-risking.

Explanation: Defensives should benefit from BEAR conditions, but the macro mix is not a clean “rates down / recession panic” setup (yield spread is positive +0.49%, VIX elevated but not extreme). Prior-session narrative also suggests classic refuge performance is weaker, so the net macro tailwind is near-neutral to slightly negative.

VIX at 26.15 signals elevated risk-off conditions; if it pushes toward >30, high-beta themes (crypto_digital, quantum, ai_compute) likely face sharper drawdowns.

Labor/consumer deterioration risk: UNRATE at 4.4% (up vs 4.0% prior year) and UMCSENT 56.4 (down vs 71.7) could intensify recession fears even without current yield-curve inversion (T10Y2Y +0.49%).

Policy/inflation persistence risk: CPI YoY 2.66% plus fed funds at 3.64% implies real-rate pressure may persist, keeping rate-sensitive real_estate under stress despite positive HOUST (+9.5% YoY).

Summary: Despite solid GDP growth (5.42%), the macro tape is dominated by BEAR risk conditions: elevated VIX (26.15), weakening consumer sentiment (UMCSENT 56.4), and rising unemployment (4.4%). Net effect is broadly negative for high-beta and speculative themes (crypto_digital, quantum, ai_compute) and moderately negative for rate-sensitive real_estate, while defense/biotech/defensive are only mildly pressured due to partial defensiveness and structural demand.

Arm Rises on Plan to Sell Own Chips With Meta as Anchor Customer

Arm's Big AI Chip Move With Meta Sends Stock Soaring

US lawmakers ask whether Nvidia CEO's smuggling remarks misled regulators

Super Micro Faces Risk After Smuggling Case

Stock Market Today, March 24: Super Micro Computer Rises Despite Regulatory Scrutiny and Analyst Downgrades

Constellation Energy Taps NVIDIA AI Factories As Power Market Role Grows

Microsoft, Nvidia Team Up To Build AI-Powered Nuclear Energy Future

How to make energy consumer-affordable: Constellation CEO explains

Anduril, Palantir Are Developing Golden Dome Missile Shield’s Software

Lockheed, Honeywell Sign Framework Deals to Accelerate Missile, Defense Tech Output

Palantir Stock Rises After Joining $185B Golden Dome Missile Project

Google Accelerates Quantum Timeline: New Dual-Track Strategy Aims For 2030 Commercial Breakthrough

Xanadu Set For Market Debut As Quantum Computing Stocks Struggle In 2026

The Bull Case For IonQ (IONQ) Could Change Following New Global Quantum Partnerships And Cambridge Hub - Learn Why

Merck To Acquire Terns Pharma For $53.00 Per Share In Cash For Approximate Equity Value Of $6.7B

AbbVie’s ABBV-295 Obesity Data Opens New Non Incretin Opportunity

Bitcoin sinks below $70,000 as Bernstein analysts say token 'looks bottomed'

Bitcoin Has Likely Bottomed as Strategy Shows Resilience Amid Plunge: Bernstein

Strategy Seeks $44.1B Capital Raise to Expand Bitcoin Holdings Amid Market Downturn

Why these three ‘narrative barriers’ pose clear risks to the Strategy Bitcoin scheme, says analyst

Gold Is Not a Haven in This War. How That Happened and Some Options for Your Money Now.

Gold's Drop Feels Different This Time

Gold Rises Off a Near Three-Month Low as the Dollar and Yields Ease

CRH and the Data Center Buildout: What Investors Miss

Bear of the Day: Vulcan Materials (VMC)

Vulcan Materials (VMC) Downgraded to Neutral by JPMorgan, Here’s Why

Arm Rises on Plan to Sell Own Chips With Meta as Anchor Customer (Bloomberg)

US lawmakers ask whether Nvidia CEO's smuggling remarks misled regulators (Reuters)

Microsoft, Nvidia Team Up To Build AI-Powered Nuclear Energy Future (Benzinga)

Bear of the Day: Vulcan Materials (VMC) (Zacks)

Vulcan Materials (VMC) Downgraded to Neutral by JPMorgan, Here’s Why (Insider Monkey)

CRH and the Data Center Buildout: What Investors Miss (Zacks)

Constellation Energy Taps NVIDIA AI Factories As Power Market Role Grows (Simply Wall St.)

Why HC Wainwright Sees Uranium Energy Well Positioned for a Bigger Production Ramp (Insider Monkey)

The AI-power story is evolving from a generic 'data centers need more electricity' thesis into a tighter strategic narrative: nuclear and grid operators are becoming embedded design partners in AI infrastructure, not just downstream beneficiaries. That raises the odds that power availability becomes a gating asset for AI deployment and supports premium valuations for dispatchable generation and grid-aware operators.

Anduril, Palantir Are Developing Golden Dome Missile Shield’s Software (The Wall Street Journal)

Honeywell Sign Supplier Framework Agreement With U.S. Department Of Defense To Increase Production Of Critical Defense Technologies; Honeywell To Commit $500M For Production Capacity Upgrades (Benzinga Newsdesk)

Lockheed, Honeywell Sign Framework Deals to Accelerate Missile, Defense Tech Output (The Wall Street Journal)

Google Accelerates Quantum Timeline: New Dual-Track Strategy Aims For 2030 Commercial Breakthrough (Benzinga)

Xanadu Set For Market Debut As Quantum Computing Stocks Struggle In 2026 (Investor's Business Daily)

The Bull Case For IonQ (IONQ) Could Change Following New Global Quantum Partnerships And Cambridge Hub - Learn Why (Simply Wall St.)

This extends and strengthens the prior session's early commercialization shift: the center of gravity is moving further toward incumbent-led roadmaps and platform ecosystems rather than pure-play speculation. Google accelerating a concrete timeline while listed quantum names still struggle suggests the market may be underpricing strategic winners inside large-cap platforms relative to retail-favored standalone names.

Merck To Acquire Terns Pharma For $53.00 Per Share In Cash For Approximate Equity Value Of $6.7B (Benzinga Newsdesk)

AbbVie’s ABBV-295 Obesity Data Opens New Non Incretin Opportunity (Simply Wall St.)

Mark Cuban Calls $30,000 Corporate Healthcare Burden 'Insane,' Backs Bill To Break Up Big Medicine Giants UNH, CVS, CI (Benzinga)

Bitcoin sinks below $70,000 as Bernstein analysts say token 'looks bottomed' (Yahoo Finance)

Strategy Seeks $44.1B Capital Raise to Expand Bitcoin Holdings Amid Market Downturn (Coinspeaker)

Why these three ‘narrative barriers’ pose clear risks to the Strategy Bitcoin scheme, says analyst (DLNews)

Gold Is Not a Haven in This War. How That Happened and Some Options for Your Money Now. (Barrons.com)

Gold's Drop Feels Different This Time (GuruFocus.com)

Gold Rises Off a Near Three-Month Low as the Dollar and Yields Ease (MT Newswires)

AI compute and energy_grid are increasingly inseparable: chip announcements are now arriving alongside power-sourcing and nuclear/grid partnerships, implying future AI winners may be constrained by energy access as much as model quality.

Defense_aerospace continues to converge with AI_compute: software, autonomy, and industrial capacity matter more than traditional broad defense beta, reinforcing the prior session's 'program-specific winners' view.

Real_estate/materials retain a quiet second-derivative link to AI via data center construction demand, but that tailwind is not yet strong enough to offset broader construction-demand softness.

Defensive weakness and crypto stabilization both reflect the same macro pressure: higher real yields and dollar strength are undermining classic hedges and limiting speculative rebound quality.

Summary: Narrative tone is near-neutral at the market level, but leadership is concentrating. The most important evolving story is that AI infrastructure is no longer just a semiconductor narrative; it is becoming a power-and-permitting narrative, which materially benefits energy_grid and selectively reinforces ai_compute. A second, smaller continuation is visible in quantum, where commercialization credibility is shifting toward incumbent platform owners like Google rather than speculative pure plays. Prior bearish breaks remain intact in defensive and crypto_digital: gold still is not behaving like a reliable crisis hedge, and crypto's 'bottoming' language is not yet enough to overturn the earlier structural concerns around funding models and monetization quality.

Narrative remains constructive around AI infrastructure leadership, with Arm/Meta vertical integration and AI-power partnerships reinforcing that value capture is concentrating in compute and control layers. Quant is still decent at the theme level (6m momentum 16.35%, 3m 6.94%) with standout strength in TSM and ASML, so the sleeve is not broken. If the market stabilizes, this theme could reassert leadership quickly.

Macro is still a headwind in a persistent BEAR regime, and prior attempts to raise conviction were explicitly vetoed. Relative strength is only flat on average (0.15 vs SPY), leadership is narrow, and several major constituents show negative 6m/3m trends or drawdowns (MSFT, AMZN, SMCI). Regulatory scrutiny around Nvidia/SMCI adds fragility. Given unchanged regime and prior veto conditions, pushing conviction higher again is premature.

Short-term price action has improved meaningfully, with 3m momentum at 12.06% and several names showing positive rebounds. Housing starts and data-center construction linkage offer a possible offset, and some REIT exposure is holding up better than feared.

Macro remains one of the worst fits here: rate sensitivity, weak consumer sentiment, and rising unemployment all argue against a durable turn. Narrative is still negative, relative strength is below SPY (-2.06), and prior session already cut conviction on a demand/margin reset story. This looks more like a tactical bounce than a clean thesis upgrade.

This is the clearest positive narrative shift in the book. The AI-power story is strengthening from generic demand uplift to power as a gating asset for AI deployment, which can support premium valuations for grid, nuclear, and dispatchable generation exposure. Quant broadly confirms enough to justify a modest increase: theme momentum is positive (6m 10.38%, 3m 9.33%), relative strength is slightly positive, and several names are very strong (GEV, UEC, NEE). Despite macro drag, the structural demand story is getting stronger, not weaker.

This sleeve still carries serious risk baggage in a BEAR regime. Volatility is high (62.35%), concentration is elevated, and SMR remains an extreme weak link with 105.69% volatility, -9.9% daily VaR, and deep historical drawdown. Prior sessions specifically flagged energy_grid risk, so any increase is vulnerable to Risk Sentinel pushback unless position construction avoids the highest-risk names.

Fundamentals and narrative are strong: Golden Dome, software-defined defense, and capacity-expansion agreements all reinforce durable spending and selective winner-take-more dynamics. Quant is excellent, with 6m momentum 19.99%, 3m 16.24%, strong relative strength (12.37), and solid Sharpe across most names. This remains one of the highest-quality sleeves in the portfolio.

The last proposed increase was vetoed, and the core risk objection has not materially changed: persistent BEAR regime plus unresolved PLTR-specific leak (-3.77% portfolio drawdown, -5.69% daily VaR). At conviction 7 already, the bar for another increase is high. The thesis is intact, but there is not enough change since the veto to justify re-proposing +1 now.

There is a real narrative shift toward more credible commercialization roadmaps led by incumbents, especially Google. That matters because it improves the quality of the story and suggests the market may be underappreciating strategic platform winners. Starting conviction is already minimal, so optionality value exists if commercialization milestones keep compounding.

Price action still does not confirm the story. Theme 3m momentum is deeply negative (-17.57%), relative strength is very weak (-22.6), volatility is extreme (67.56), and concentration is too high (HHI 0.3061), which has been a repeated veto trigger. In this BEAR regime, narrative improvement alone is not enough to add risk here yet.

Narrative is mildly positive with M&A support and ongoing innovation in obesity and specialty therapeutics. The sleeve has secular demand and some defensiveness, and portfolio drawdowns are not alarming. This remains a plausible source of idiosyncratic upside if macro pressure eases.

Quant is not confirming: 3m momentum is negative (-3.33%), relative strength is poor (-12.94), and leadership is uneven with notable weakness in NVO and ISRG. Macro is mildly negative and funding/valuation conditions are not especially supportive for growthy healthcare optionality. No strong reason to press conviction higher yet.

There are early signs of stabilization in the narrative, with 'bottoming' language emerging around Bitcoin. Since conviction is already at the floor, downside from a thesis-rating perspective is limited, and a reflex rally is always possible in this kind of sleeve.

This remains the weakest theme by far. Macro is strongly negative, narrative is still negative, momentum is awful (6m -50.71%, 3m -26.0), relative strength is poor, volatility is extreme, concentration is too high, and realized capital impairment is ongoing with COIN at -9.76% and MARA at -7.41% portfolio drawdown. This is exactly the kind of sleeve that should be de-emphasized in a persistent BEAR regime.

Even though the gold narrative is weak, the actual quant profile is strong and increasingly important in this regime: 6m momentum 22.83%, 3m 14.92%, positive relative strength 8.14, low volatility 18.76, and shallow portfolio drawdowns. In a 100% BEAR regime with 9-day persistence, the portfolio needs more ballast, and prior veto commentary explicitly noted defensive conviction at 4 was too low. This is the cleanest increase to align the book with regime reality.

Narrative remains a real blemish: gold is not acting like a classic haven, and the macro backdrop is not a perfect recession-panic setup. Some components like PG and TLT have weak Sharpe, so the hedge basket is not uniformly strong. This is more of a portfolio-construction increase than a pure thematic breakout.

Bullish-leaning analyst, but tempered by persistent BEAR regime and repeated prior-session vetoes; preference is for selective increases only where narrative shift or portfolio ballast is strong enough to overcome macro drag.

Summary: I am selectively constructive, not broadly risk-on. The persistent BEAR regime and repeated veto history argue against re-proposing increases in high-beta growth sleeves unless conditions have clearly changed. That keeps ai_compute, defense_aerospace, quantum, biotech_health, and real_estate on hold despite some pockets of strength. The two themes where I do see actionable upside in conviction are energy_grid, because it has the strongest live narrative shift tied to AI infrastructure bottlenecks, and defensive, because both quant evidence and prior veto context say the portfolio needs more ballast. Crypto_digital remains the clearest area to cut or keep minimized.

Macro headwind remains negative in a firm BEAR regime (impact_score -0.25) with VIX 26.15, which is unfavorable for high-beta tech multiples.

Theme average volatility is 44.3%, elevated even for an aggressive sleeve.

Several constituents breach the 3% daily VaR threshold: NVDA -3.74%, AMD -5.37%, AVGO -4.13%, TSM -3.50%, SMCI -7.54%, ASML -3.72%, AMZN -3.05%.

Single-name quality dispersion is wide: SMCI has -30.01% 6m momentum, -23.83 relative strength vs SPY, 79.21% volatility, and -66.18% historical max drawdown.

Relative strength is only marginal at theme level (0.15 vs SPY), so the sleeve is not delivering strong enough leadership to justify more risk in this tape.

This sleeve faces the strongest macro headwind among non-crypto themes (impact_score -0.55) under restrictive Fed conditions and weak consumer sentiment.

Theme relative strength is negative (-2.06 vs SPY), indicating underperformance despite a short-term 3m bounce.

Multiple names exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold: DHI -3.46%, LEN -3.84%, TOL -3.13%, AMT -3.10%, RKT -5.36%.

AMT is already down -3.48% from entry, the deepest realized drawdown in the sleeve.

Risk-adjusted quality is mixed to weak in key names: LEN Sharpe -0.604, SHW -0.409, AMT -0.907.

Macro backdrop is negative (impact_score -0.35) and the sleeve carries very high theme volatility at 62.35%, well above moderate-risk tolerance.

Daily VaR breaches are widespread: CEG -4.67%, FSLR -5.45%, SMR -9.90%, UEC -7.05%, GEV -4.43%.

SMR remains the dominant risk leak: 105.69% volatility, -9.90% daily VaR, -78.61% historical max drawdown, and -2.31% portfolio drawdown.

FSLR and UEC also carry outsized tail risk with 63.51% and 76.18% volatility respectively.

Prior-session concern has not been resolved: SMR drawdown improved from worse prior levels, but structural risk metrics remain extreme.

This is one of the stronger sleeves, but it is not risk-free in a BEAR regime.

PLTR is the clear outlier: -16.14% 3m momentum, 57.58% volatility, -5.69% daily VaR, and -3.77% portfolio drawdown.

Theme concentration HHI is 0.1834, acceptable but not low given conviction is already 7.

The sleeve is already one of the highest-conviction allocations; increasing further would add concentration to a single favored theme in a bear tape.

Theme concentration is too high: HHI 0.3061 exceeds the 0.25 concentration threshold.

Macro headwind is severe for speculative duration assets (impact_score -0.40) in a 100% BEAR regime.

Theme average volatility is 67.56%, extremely high.

Theme 3m momentum is -17.57% and relative strength is -22.6 vs SPY, confirming weak tape behavior.

Daily VaR is extreme in pure plays: IONQ -8.18%, RGTI -8.78%, IBM -3.16%.

Historical drawdown profile is unacceptable for expansion here: IONQ -62.93%, RGTI -73.59%.

Macro impact is only mildly negative (-0.15), but the sleeve is not acting defensive: theme 3m momentum is -3.33% and relative strength is -12.94 vs SPY.

Theme average volatility is 44.38%, high for a moderate-risk sleeve.

Daily VaR breaches above 3% are present in LLY -3.59%, NVO -4.70%, and CRSP -6.17%.

Risk-adjusted performance is weak in important names: NVO Sharpe -1.094, ISRG -0.269, ABBV 0.023.

The sleeve is close to concentration concern territory with HHI 0.2231, though not yet above threshold.

Theme concentration is too high: HHI 0.3061 exceeds the 0.25 threshold.

This sleeve has the worst macro headwind in the portfolio (impact_score -0.75) in a persistent BEAR regime.

Theme average volatility is 71.58%, extremely high, with all names above 54%.

Momentum is decisively broken: theme average -50.71% over 6m and -26.0% over 3m.

Daily VaR is far above threshold across the board: COIN -6.58%, MSTR -7.61%, MARA -8.31%, XYZ -5.27%.

Realized capital impairment is already severe from entry: COIN -9.76%, MARA -7.41%, XYZ -2.09%, MSTR -1.41%.

Prior veto condition has worsened rather than healed: crypto remains the clearest source of actual loss.

Macro impact is near neutral (-0.05), but this sleeve is still the best ballast available in the current regime.

Theme average volatility is only 18.76%, the lowest in the portfolio.

All daily VaR readings are below the 3% threshold, ranging from -1.20% to -2.54%.

Relative strength is positive at 8.14 vs SPY and 3m momentum is strong at 14.92%.

Current conviction of 4 is acceptable but still light relative to a 100% BEAR regime.

Crypto & Digital actual drawdowns remain the most serious: COIN -9.76% and MARA -7.41% from entry, confirming ongoing capital impairment.

Defense & Aerospace PLTR is down -3.77% from entry with -5.69% daily VaR, making it the main leak in an otherwise resilient sleeve.

Real Estate AMT is down -3.48% from entry in a sleeve facing a -0.55 macro impact and restrictive-rate backdrop.

AI & Compute GOOG is down -3.28% and MSFT -2.68% from entry, showing that even higher-quality megacaps are not immune in this tape.

Energy & Grid SMR is down -2.31% from entry, but the larger issue is its extreme structural risk: 105.69% volatility and -9.90% daily VaR.

Summary: Risk remains decisively elevated at the portfolio level and still warrants a veto on any conviction increases. The key reason is not broad market volatility alone; it is the combination of a fully persistent BEAR regime, unresolved concentration in speculative sleeves, repeated VaR breaches across multiple themes, and actual capital impairment already visible in crypto_digital. Prior veto conditions have not materially improved across the last three sessions. Defense_aerospace and defensive remain the most stable sleeves, but they do not offset the tail risk embedded in crypto_digital, quantum, and the SMR-heavy portion of energy_grid. Recommended posture: no increases, continue reducing or exiting crypto_digital and quantum risk, trim the highest-risk names in energy_grid and real_estate, and maintain at least a defensive floor of 3.

Summary: VETOED: Portfolio-level risk remains in veto territory. The market regime is BEAR with 100% confidence, 9-day persistence, and 0.98 BEAR->BEAR continuation, and the prior three session veto conditions have not improved enough to clear. Two speculative sleeves remain over-concentrated (quantum HHI 0.3061, crypto_digital HHI 0.3061 > 0.25), multiple themes still breach the 3% daily VaR threshold, energy_grid still contains extreme single-name risk in SMR (105.69% vol, -9.90% daily VaR), and realized capital impairment remains acute in crypto_digital (COIN -9.76%, MARA -7.41% portfolio drawdown). No conviction increases should be approved this session.. Only conviction decreases applied.

Summary: 29 orders, 24 sells, 5 buys, turnover 9.31%, regime sizing 50%


Market regime is firmly BEAR (state prob BEAR=1.0, confidence 100%, 10-day persistence). Macro risk is consistent with a growth scare/risk-off tape: VIX is elevated at 26.95, consumer sentiment is weak (UMCSENT 56.4 vs 71.7 prior-year), and the yield curve is not inverted (T10Y2Y +0.49%) but recession risk is still present via tightening financial conditions and risk premia.

Fed policy remains restrictive: fed funds at 3.64% is still meaningfully above recent inflation (CPI YoY 2.66%), but the BEAR regime plus elevated VIX suggests markets are pricing slower growth and/or higher risk premia rather than a clean easing cycle.

Inflation is cooling (CPI YoY 2.66%). This is a partial tailwind for rate-sensitive themes, but it is not strong enough to flip the overall risk regime given weak sentiment and elevated volatility.

Growth looks resilient on the surface (GDP YoY 5.42%), but labor and demand signals are mixed: unemployment is higher (4.4% vs 4.0% prior-year) and consumer sentiment is materially down (56.4 vs 71.7). Jobless claims are slightly improving (205k vs 208k prior month), and housing starts are strong (HOUST +9.5% YoY), implying a divergence rather than a broad collapse.

Explanation: Despite strong GDP (5.42%) and a cooling inflation print (2.66%), the BEAR regime with elevated VIX (26.95) is a headwind for high-multiple growth/compute exposure and risk appetite.

Explanation: Housing starts are supportive (+9.5% YoY to 1487k), and CPI is moderating (2.66%), but the overall BEAR tape and weaker consumer sentiment (56.4) limit upside for construction/REIT demand.

Explanation: AI-driven power demand is a structural tailwind, but macro risk-off (VIX 26.95) and recession/slowdown fears in a BEAR regime typically compress infrastructure multiples and raise financing risk.

Explanation: Defense is relatively macro-insensitive, and the current data show no acute inflation re-acceleration (CPI 2.66%)—but BEAR conditions still pressure equities broadly, limiting the tailwind.

Explanation: Quantum remains high-beta/high-duration and is most vulnerable to BEAR/risk-off conditions; elevated VIX (26.95) and weak sentiment (UMCSENT 56.4) are direct headwinds.

Explanation: Biotech has some defensiveness versus pure cyclicals, and inflation is cooling, but BEAR regime volatility still tends to reduce risk capital allocation to speculative growth pockets.

Explanation: Crypto is highly sensitive to liquidity/risk appetite; with VIX elevated (26.95) and the market in a high-conviction BEAR state, macro tailwinds are minimal and risk-off dominates.

Explanation: While inflation is moderating (2.66%) and unemployment is not spiking violently, the BEAR regime and elevated VIX (26.95) suggest defensives are not fully acting as ballast; consumer sentiment is also weak (56.4).

VIX at 26.95 signals elevated tail risk; in a BEAR regime this can further compress high-multiple themes (ai_compute, quantum, crypto_digital).

Consumer sentiment deterioration (UMCSENT 56.4 vs 71.7 prior-year) combined with rising unemployment (4.4% vs 4.0%) increases the probability of demand softness even if GDP remains strong (5.42%).

Housing is strong (+9.5% YoY starts), but if it reverses while unemployment rises, it would create a sharper labor-vs-housing divergence unwind (unemployment 4.4% vs claims 205k).

Summary: Macro prints are mixed: inflation is cooling (CPI 2.66%) and housing starts are strong (+9.5% YoY), but the market is in a high-conviction BEAR regime with elevated volatility (VIX 26.95) and weak consumer sentiment (UMCSENT 56.4). Net effect: growth/speculative themes (crypto_digital, quantum, ai_compute) face the largest macro headwinds, while real_estate and defense are comparatively less negative due to partial offsetting supports (housing strength and relative defensiveness).

Arm Rises on Plan to Sell Own Chips With Meta as Key Client

Broadcom’s AI Revenue Just Doubled. The Stock Barely Moved

In Wild Year Since IPO, CoreWeave Stock Is Lagging Rival Nebius

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang claims AGI has been 'achieved,' can create billion-dollar businesses

Microsoft, Nvidia Team Up To Build AI-Powered Nuclear Energy Future

Constellation Energy Taps NVIDIA AI Factories As Power Market Role Grows

How to make energy consumer-affordable: Constellation CEO explains

Anduril, Palantir developing Golden Dome missile shield's software, source says

Palantir Secures Pentagon Maven Role As Valuation And Growth Debated

Honeywell Sign Supplier Framework Agreement With U.S. Department Of Defense To Increase Production Of Critical Defense Technologies; Honeywell To Commit $500M For Production Capacity Upgrades

Google Accelerates Quantum Timeline: New Dual-Track Strategy Aims For 2030 Commercial Breakthrough

BofA Reaffirms Buy on IBM Stock Amid Agentic AI Expansion

Merck To Acquire Terns Pharma For $53.00 Per Share In Cash For Approximate Equity Value Of $6.7B

GE HealthCare Wins FDA 510(k) Clearance for Photonova Spectra PCCT

Circle stock sinks 20% over reports that Clarity Act could restrict stablecoin rewards

Coinbase Tumbles As Clarity Act Hits Snag In Senate; Is Coinbase Stock A Sell Now?

Circle, Coinbase Tumble on News of Clarity Act Deal

Coca-Cola spends $650M to expand Fairlife production

Coca-Cola Faces Margin Pressure: Can Pricing Power Hold?

CRH and the Data Center Buildout: What Investors Miss

Arm Rises on Plan to Sell Own Chips With Meta as Key Client (Bloomberg)

Broadcom’s AI Revenue Just Doubled. The Stock Barely Moved (24/7 Wall St.)

In Wild Year Since IPO, CoreWeave Stock Is Lagging Rival Nebius (Bloomberg)

Microsoft, Nvidia Team Up To Build AI-Powered Nuclear Energy Future (Benzinga)

This is a material evolution of the prior 'own the compute/control layer' shift: the market is now distinguishing between AI revenue growth and AI equity reward. Arm moving into direct chips and Broadcom doubling AI revenue with muted stock response suggest the story is shifting from 'AI growth lifts all infrastructure names' to 'only scarce control points and efficient capital structures will be rewarded.' That is a more selective, less euphoric AI narrative.

CRH and the Data Center Buildout: What Investors Miss (Zacks)

CRH Stock Outlook for 2026: IIJA, Water, Data Centers (Zacks)

RBC Capital Flags Iran Conflict Risk to Sherwin-Williams Margins (Insider Monkey)

Constellation Energy Taps NVIDIA AI Factories As Power Market Role Grows (Simply Wall St.)

Better Nuclear Energy Stock: NuScale Power vs. Constellation Energy (Motley Fool)

Anduril, Palantir developing Golden Dome missile shield's software, source says (Reuters)

Palantir Secures Pentagon Maven Role As Valuation And Growth Debated (Simply Wall St.)

Honeywell Sign Supplier Framework Agreement With U.S. Department Of Defense To Increase Production Of Critical Defense Technologies (Benzinga)

This strengthens the prior session’s industrial-policy/software-platform shift. The story is broadening beyond Palantir-specific wins into a system-level rearmament narrative: software-defined defense, missile shield architecture, and domestic production capacity are converging. Defense leadership is increasingly about integrated software plus manufacturing throughput, not just legacy prime exposure.

Google Accelerates Quantum Timeline: New Dual-Track Strategy Aims For 2030 Commercial Breakthrough (Benzinga)

BofA Reaffirms Buy on IBM Stock Amid Agentic AI Expansion (Insider Monkey)

Masters AI Experience Launch Could Be A Game Changer For International Business Machines (Simply Wall St.)

Merck To Acquire Terns Pharma For $53.00 Per Share In Cash For Approximate Equity Value Of $6.7B (Benzinga Newsdesk)

GE HealthCare Wins FDA 510(k) Clearance for Photonova Spectra PCCT (Zacks)

Intuitive Surgical Extends Southern Europe Reach As Stock Trades Below Targets (Simply Wall St.)

Circle stock sinks 20% over reports that Clarity Act could restrict stablecoin rewards (Yahoo Finance)

Coinbase Tumbles As Clarity Act Hits Snag In Senate; Is Coinbase Stock A Sell Now? (Investor's Business Daily)

Circle, Coinbase Tumble on News of Clarity Act Deal (The Wall Street Journal)

This is the clearest fresh narrative break of the session. The market story is changing from 'regulatory clarity unlocks institutional adoption' to 'regulation may legalize crypto while capping the economics of key business models, especially stablecoin yield and platform monetization.' That is more damaging than a generic risk-off move because it attacks the profit pool, not the legitimacy of the asset class.

Coca-Cola spends $650M to expand Fairlife production (Food Dive)

Coca-Cola Expands Fairlife And Bottler Investments To Broaden Earnings Mix (Simply Wall St.)

Coca-Cola Faces Margin Pressure: Can Pricing Power Hold? (Zacks)

AI infrastructure and energy are becoming inseparable: Microsoft/Nvidia/Constellation link compute deployment directly to dispatchable power and grid-aware operations.

Data-center buildout is spilling into old-economy beneficiaries: CRH/materials exposure suggests AI capex is propagating into construction and industrial supply chains.

Defense and AI are converging around software-defined national infrastructure: Palantir/Anduril wins and Honeywell capacity expansion point to dual-use platforms plus domestic manufacturing.

Policy divergence is stark: Washington appears supportive toward AI and defense capacity, but more restrictive toward crypto monetization, creating a relative narrative tailwind for regulated physical infrastructure over digital-financial rails.

Summary: Session narrative is mixed at the market level but highly selective beneath the surface. The strongest positive continuity remains in energy_grid and defense_aerospace, where prior shifts are being confirmed rather than reversed: AI power demand is becoming a design constraint, and defense is evolving into a software-plus-capacity story. AI_compute remains positive, but the internal story is maturing into narrower leadership and harsher market discrimination between revenue growth and shareholder reward. Quantum continues its incumbent-led commercialization arc with Google reinforcing prior progress. The most important new negative development is in crypto_digital, where the Clarity Act headlines suggest regulation may compress stablecoin economics rather than simply bless the industry. Real_estate remains weak-to-neutral overall, though data-center construction is a meaningful offset inside materials. Defensive is modestly improved at the company level via KO investment, but not enough to overturn the prior concern that classic hedges are not uniformly behaving as crisis ballast.

Narrative remains constructive and selective rather than broken. The shift toward owning scarce control points in the AI stack is real, and quant still shows decent aggregate momentum (6m +18.38%, 3m +8.86%) with slight positive relative strength vs SPY (+0.87). High-quality leaders like TSM and ASML are still confirming the capex cycle, and AI-power integration reinforces the strategic importance of compute infrastructure.

Macro is a clear headwind in a 100% BEAR regime, and the prior +1 proposal was vetoed with those conditions still unresolved. The new narrative shift is positive in quality but also negative in breadth: AI revenue is no longer translating into broad equity reward. Internally, the sleeve is fragmented, with several mega-cap software/platform names showing weak RS and negative recent momentum, while volatility and VaR remain elevated for a bear tape.

Housing starts and cooling inflation provide a modest macro offset, and short-term price action has improved materially (3m theme momentum +9.56%). Several construction/materials names and select REITs are acting better than the headline narrative suggests, and data-center buildout offers a nontraditional demand tailwind for parts of the sleeve.

The broader narrative is still weak-to-neutral, relative strength remains negative (-2.48 vs SPY), and the prior session already cut conviction here. In a restrictive-rate, risk-off environment, the sleeve still looks mixed rather than leadership-quality, with rate-sensitive exposures and some ongoing portfolio drawdowns limiting the case for re-risking.

This remains one of the strongest structural stories in the book. Narrative is robust (+0.54) and reinforced by cross-theme evidence that power is becoming a gating asset for AI deployment. Quant confirmation is decent: 6m momentum +13.25%, 3m +12.33%, RS +3.49, with standout strength in NEE, UEC, and especially GEV. If the market stabilizes, this sleeve has credible upside as physical infrastructure with secular demand.

This exact increase case was vetoed recently and the blocking conditions have not improved enough. Macro is still mildly negative, theme volatility is very high (62.35%), concentration is elevated, and SMR remains an extreme single-name risk with 105.69% vol and -9.9% daily VaR. In a persistent BEAR regime, that risk profile can overwhelm the otherwise strong narrative.

Defense has the cleanest combination of positive narrative and quant confirmation outside defensives. The narrative shift is meaningful: the theme is broadening from conflict hedge to software-defined defense plus domestic capacity buildout. Quant is strong across the sleeve (6m +19.81%, 3m +17.19%, RS +12.74), with solid Sharpe ratios and low current portfolio drawdowns in most names. Macro is slightly supportive relative to other equities, making this one of the best places to lean bullish even in a BEAR tape.

The prior +1 was vetoed, so this is not a clean approval case. PLTR remains the weak link with negative momentum, negative RS, elevated volatility, and higher VaR than the rest of the sleeve. Broad equity risk in a 100% BEAR regime can still compress multiples, especially for software-heavy defense exposures.

Narrative continues to improve as commercialization credibility shifts toward incumbents like Google and IBM. That matters because it reduces the 'science project only' stigma and suggests strategic value may be building beneath the surface. With conviction already at 1, optionality is preserved if price eventually catches up to the roadmap.

This remains one of the weakest quant setups in the universe. Macro is strongly negative, 3m momentum is deeply negative (-17.34), RS is very poor (-21.39), volatility is extreme (67.56), concentration is too high (HHI 0.3061), and prior vetoes explicitly flagged this sleeve. Positive narrative without price confirmation is not enough in this regime.

There is a modestly constructive backdrop here: M&A activity, regulatory/technology wins, and some defensive characteristics support the sleeve. Macro is only slightly negative, and the theme has enough idiosyncratic catalysts to outperform if the tape remains selective rather than indiscriminately risk-off.

Quant does not confirm a stronger stance. Theme momentum is mixed (3m -4.6%), RS is weak (-12.67), and several key names are under pressure, especially NVO. In this market, capital is unlikely to rotate aggressively into a sleeve with only moderate narrative support and poor relative performance.

At current low conviction, the only constructive argument is that the sleeve is already heavily de-risked and could eventually benefit from any future policy stabilization or liquidity rebound. Keeping some residual optionality at the floor preserves exposure to a sharp reflexive recovery if the regulatory story improves.

This is the clearest negative setup in the book. Macro is severely hostile (-0.7 impact), the narrative shift is decisively negative and attacks the profit pool rather than sentiment alone, and quant is extremely weak across momentum, RS, volatility, VaR, and drawdown. Prior sessions already flagged worsening capital impairment in COIN and MARA; while drawdowns have improved somewhat from the worst flagged levels, the sleeve remains structurally broken in this tape.

This is the most straightforward regime-aligned increase. Despite the macro impact score being slightly negative, the actual tape behavior is strong: 6m momentum +23.55%, 3m +13.64%, RS +8.68, low volatility (18.78), and generally contained drawdowns. In a persistent BEAR regime, the combination of staples, gold, and duration is finally acting more like usable ballast, and prior veto concerns about insufficient defensive conviction remain relevant.

The narrative is only mildly positive, not a true shift, and the last proposed +1 was vetoed. Macro commentary notes defensives are not uniformly behaving as ballast, and some components still have weak Sharpe profiles. If the market's bear regime is driven more by growth scare than panic, classic hedges may help less than expected.

Bullish-leaning analyst bias applied, but tempered by persistent BEAR regime, prior veto history, and unresolved portfolio-level risk flags.

Summary: I am selectively constructive rather than broadly bullish. In this persistent BEAR regime, I do not want to repeat prior vetoed increases where the underlying risk conditions have not improved enough. The best upside-adjusted case is Defense & Aerospace, where narrative shift, macro resilience, and quant confirmation align. Defensive also merits a modest increase because the tape is rewarding ballast more clearly than before. AI Compute and Energy Grid remain strategically attractive, but both stay at hold due to prior veto history and unresolved volatility/risk concerns. Quantum stays at floor despite improving narrative because price action is too weak. Crypto & Digital remains the clearest negative theme and should stay pinned at minimum conviction.

Macro headwind remains negative in a firm BEAR regime (impact_score -0.25) with VIX 26.95 pressuring high-multiple growth exposure.

Theme average volatility is 44.29%, with several names carrying daily VaR above the 3% threshold: AMD -5.37%, AVGO -4.13%, TSM -3.50%, SMCI -7.53%, ASML -3.72%, AMZN -3.05%, NVDA -3.73%.

Internal quality is uneven despite positive average momentum: SMCI has -29.36% 6m momentum and -66.18% historical max drawdown; MSFT has -22.86% 6m momentum and negative Sharpe (-0.267).

Realized capital impairment is limited but present in GOOG (-3.17%), MSFT (-2.32%), and META (-0.79%) from entry.

Macro backdrop is only marginally supportive (impact_score 0.05); restrictive Fed and weak consumer sentiment limit upside despite strong housing starts.

Theme average daily risk is mixed, with VaR breaches in DHI -3.46%, LEN -3.84%, TOL -3.13%, AMT -3.10%, and RKT -5.36%.

Several positions are already in drawdown from entry: AMT -3.48%, LEN -3.19%, DHI -3.09%, TOL -2.84%.

Relative strength is weak at theme average -2.48 vs SPY, suggesting the sleeve is not clearly winning even with housing support.

Macro impact is negative (-0.15) and financing-sensitive infrastructure is vulnerable in a BEAR/risk-off regime.

Theme average volatility is very high at 62.35%, well above moderate-risk tolerance.

Multiple names breach the 3% daily VaR threshold: CEG -4.67%, FSLR -5.45%, SMR -9.90%, UEC -7.05%, GEV -4.43%.

Single-name risk is extreme in SMR: 105.69% volatility, -9.90% daily VaR, and -78.61% historical max drawdown.

Although current portfolio drawdowns are near zero, that reflects entry timing more than low forward risk.

This is one of the stronger sleeves, but conviction is already high at 7 with a 12% max allocation cap, limiting room for error in a BEAR regime.

PLTR is the clear risk leak: 57.58% volatility, -5.69% daily VaR, and -1.54% portfolio drawdown; its behavior is materially riskier than the rest of the sleeve.

Theme average volatility is manageable at 31.25%, but the sleeve is not uniformly defensive because PLTR adds high-beta software exposure.

Macro headwind is strongly negative (impact_score -0.35) in a high-conviction BEAR regime, directly pressuring speculative duration assets.

Theme concentration is too high: HHI 0.3061 exceeds the 0.25 concentration threshold.

Theme average volatility is extreme at 67.56%.

Daily VaR is far above threshold in IONQ -8.18%, RGTI -8.78%, and IBM -3.16%.

Momentum is deteriorating: theme average 3m momentum is -17.34% and relative strength is -21.39 vs SPY.

Historical drawdown profile is severe: IONQ -62.93%, RGTI -73.59%.

Macro impact is only slightly negative (-0.05), but the sleeve is not acting defensive enough: theme average relative strength is -12.67 vs SPY.

Theme average volatility is 44.33%, high for a moderate-risk sleeve.

VaR breaches are widespread: LLY -3.59%, NVO -4.69%, CRSP -6.16%.

Internal dispersion is high: NVO has -31.51% 6m momentum and Sharpe -1.081; ISRG has negative Sharpe (-0.272).

Current realized drawdowns are limited, but weak momentum and poor relative strength argue against adding risk.

Macro headwind is the worst in the portfolio (impact_score -0.70) and directly conflicts with a BEAR/risk-off regime.

Theme concentration is too high: HHI 0.3061 exceeds the 0.25 threshold.

Theme average volatility is extreme at 71.58%.

All constituents breach the 3% daily VaR threshold: COIN -6.58%, MSTR -7.61%, MARA -8.31%, XYZ -5.27%.

Momentum is decisively negative: theme average 6m momentum -48.94% and 3m momentum -25.12%.

Realized capital impairment remains the worst in the book despite some improvement from prior sessions: COIN -6.34%, MARA -5.05%, MSTR -1.41% from entry.

Historical drawdown profile is severe: MSTR -76.53%, MARA -70.53%, COIN -66.39%.

This is the lowest-volatility sleeve and the best ballast available, but macro commentary suggests defensives are not providing perfect protection in this tape.

Theme average volatility is low at 18.78% and all daily VaR readings are below the 3% threshold, which is supportive.

Current conviction is 4, which is above the minimum floor but still modest relative to a 100% confidence BEAR regime.

Some ballast components remain imperfect: TLT Sharpe is negative (-0.687) and PG Sharpe is negative (-0.876).

Crypto & Digital still has the deepest realized capital impairment: COIN -6.34% and MARA -5.05% from entry.

Real Estate has multiple live drawdowns from entry, led by AMT -3.48%, LEN -3.19%, and DHI -3.09%.

AI & Compute has moderate live drawdowns in GOOG -3.17% and MSFT -2.32%, showing the sleeve is not immune despite strong headline momentum.

Quantum drawdowns from entry are currently limited, but this understates risk given extreme VaR, concentration, and historical max drawdowns.

Summary: Risk remains too high to authorize any conviction increases. The decisive driver is portfolio context, not one isolated position: a persistent BEAR regime with 100% confidence, repeated VaR breaches across growth/speculative sleeves, and unresolved concentration risk in quantum and crypto. Energy_grid also remains structurally dangerous because of very high volatility and SMR-specific tail risk. Defense and defensive are the only relatively stable sleeves, but they are not strong enough to offset the broader risk stack. Maintain the veto, avoid adding to AI/energy/quantum/crypto, and prioritize reduction or exit in crypto_digital and quantum while keeping at least a 4 conviction floor in defensive exposure.

Summary: VETOED: Portfolio-level risk remains in veto territory. The market regime is BEAR with 100% confidence, 10-day persistence, and 0.98 BEAR->BEAR continuation. Prior veto conditions have not cleared: speculative sleeves are still over-concentrated (quantum HHI 0.3061, crypto_digital HHI 0.3061 > 0.25), multiple themes continue to breach the 3% daily VaR threshold, and several high-beta sleeves face strong macro headwinds in a risk-off tape. While realized drawdowns in crypto have improved versus prior sessions (COIN -6.34%, MARA -5.05%), structural risk remains too high to approve any conviction increases this session.. Only conviction decreases applied.

Summary: 29 orders, 16 sells, 13 buys, turnover 7.66%, regime sizing 50%


HMM market regime is firmly BEAR (100% probability, 10-day persistence). Macro backdrop is risk-off: VIX is elevated at 26.95 (not extreme), consumer sentiment is weak (UMCSENT 56.4 vs 71.7 prior-year), and unemployment is rising (UNRATE 4.4 vs 4.0 prior-year) while growth remains positive but not “cooling enough” to fully de-risk duration.

Fed policy is still restrictive/neutral-to-tight in effect: fed funds at 3.64% with CPI still at 2.66% YoY (inflation not collapsing). With a BEAR regime and elevated VIX, markets likely discount slower easing and continued sensitivity to rates.

Inflation is moderating but not fully tamed: CPI YoY 2.66% is below prior-year levels implied by the prior-year sentiment drop, yet still above a “comfortably low” zone for aggressive cuts. This supports a cautious stance on rate-sensitive and long-duration themes.

Growth is resilient but weakening at the margin: GDP YoY 5.42% is strong, ISM employment is elevated (MANEMP 12573), and jobless claims are easing slightly (205k vs 208k prior month). However, rising unemployment (4.4%) plus weak consumer sentiment (56.4) suggests growth quality is deteriorating, consistent with a BEAR tape.

Explanation: Risk-off conditions (BEAR regime, VIX 26.95) and selective equity reward for “control points” reduce broad multiple expansion. Rates/inflation sensitivity limits upside breadth even though GDP/ISM employment remain supportive.

Explanation: Rate-sensitive headwind: fed funds 3.64% and restrictive duration backdrop plus weak consumer sentiment (UMCSENT 56.4) pressure housing/REIT demand. Housing starts are improving (HOUST +9.5% YoY), but the macro tape remains bearish.

Explanation: Mixed macro: manufacturing employment and GDP support capex demand, and elevated VIX can increase “infrastructure defensiveness.” But BEAR risk-off caps valuation expansion; net effect is near-neutral given no direct inflation/curve tailwind (10Y-2Y spread +0.49%, not inverted).

Explanation: Relatively insulated from the business cycle: even with BEAR risk appetite, defense spending narratives are less dependent on consumer sentiment or housing. Rising unemployment and weak sentiment are not strong negatives for defense, though higher risk premia can still pressure equities.

Explanation: High-beta/early-stage themes typically suffer in BEAR regimes with elevated VIX (26.95) due to tighter risk budgets. While GDP is strong, the lack of a clear “liquidity tailwind” makes funding/valuation risk a headwind.

Explanation: Some defensiveness versus pure growth, but still equity-multiple sensitive under risk-off conditions. Inflation is only moderately high (CPI 2.66% YoY) and unemployment is rising (4.4%), which slightly dampens risk appetite.

Explanation: Liquidity/risk appetite headwind is strong: BEAR regime with VIX at 26.95 typically compresses crypto risk premia. Additionally, rising unemployment (4.4%) and weak consumer sentiment (56.4) reduce speculative inflows, making macro-driven downside likely.

Explanation: Defensive/hedge themes benefit in BEAR regimes as investors rotate toward stability. Elevated VIX (26.95) supports demand for hedges, and unemployment rising (4.4%) increases the relative appeal of defensives despite only moderately easing inflation (CPI 2.66%).

Recession-risk build despite non-inversion: 10Y-2Y spread is positive (+0.49%) but unemployment is rising (UNRATE 4.4 vs 4.0 prior-year) and consumer sentiment is weak (UMCSENT 56.4), which can still trigger earnings downgrades in a BEAR regime.

Volatility-driven drawdowns: VIX at 26.95 signals elevated tail risk; high-beta themes (quantum, ai_compute, crypto_digital) are most exposed to multiple compression and risk-budget cuts.

Summary: Macro is consistent with a BEAR regime: elevated VIX (26.95), weakening consumer sentiment (UMCSENT 56.4), and rising unemployment (4.4%) outweigh the still-strong GDP growth (5.42%). Net implications: rate-sensitive real estate and speculative themes (crypto_digital, quantum) face the largest headwinds, while defensive/hedge and defense_aerospace are comparatively supported.

Arm Rises on Plan to Sell Own Chips With Meta as Key Client

Arm Forecasts Steep Sales Ramp For New AI Server Chip

Broadcom’s AI Revenue Just Doubled. The Stock Barely Moved

Chip Shortage 2026: Why CPUs From Intel And AMD Are Getting Harder To Find

Microsoft, Nvidia Team Up To Build AI-Powered Nuclear Energy Future

NextEra Energy Links AI Factories To Grid As Valuation Stays Rich

NextEra to develop 9.5 GW of gas in Texas, Pennsylvania

Zacks Investment Ideas feature highlights: NextEra Energy

Google Accelerates Quantum Timeline: New Dual-Track Strategy Aims For 2030 Commercial Breakthrough

Xanadu Set For Market Debut As Quantum Computing Stocks Struggle In 2026

IonQ or QBTS: Which Quantum Stock Should You Hold After 2026 Sell-Off?

General Dynamics Corporation (GD) Secures $15.38 Billion Navy Contract Modification

US Defense Department Signs $500 Million Contract With Honeywell

Honeywell Sign Supplier Framework Agreement With U.S. Department Of Defense To Increase Production Of Critical Defense Technologies; Honeywell To Commit $500M For Production Capacity Upgrades

Northrop Stock Drops After President Trump Post. Why Defense Still Can’t Catch a Break.

Merck To Acquire Terns Pharma For $53.00 Per Share In Cash For Approximate Equity Value Of $6.7B

Gilead to Buy Ouro Medicines for $2.2 Billion. Why the Deal Is Key to Future Stock Gains.

LLY or ABBV: Which Drugmaker is Likely to Offer Better Upside in 2026?

Shifting Story For Marathon Digital (MARA) As Bitcoin Weakens And AI Pivot Faces Questions

Crypto Miners Are Losing Nearly $20,000 On Each Bitcoin Produced

MARA Holdings Seeks steadier AI Revenue With Starwood Data Center Pivot

Apollo Global (APO) Caps Redemptions at 5% for Apollo Debt Solutions

Better Dividend Stock: Realty Income vs. NNN REIT

Coca-Cola spends $650M to expand Fairlife production

Coca-Cola Faces Margin Pressure: Can Pricing Power Hold?

The VIX Crashes Out, For Now, on Hope For Peace and Cheaper Oil

Bloomberg: Arm plans to sell its own chips with Meta as key client, deepening vertical integration in AI infrastructure.

Investor's Business Daily: Arm forecasts steep sales ramp for new AI server chip aimed at agentic AI workloads.

24/7 Wall St.: Broadcom AI revenue doubled but stock response was muted, reinforcing selectivity in AI equity reward.

Benzinga: Microsoft and Nvidia tie AI buildout to nuclear energy, linking compute expansion to power availability.

Material evolution of the prior session’s selective-AI story: the market narrative is moving from 'own the compute/control layer' to 'own the scarce control points that also secure power.' Arm’s shift from neutral IP licensor to direct chip vendor with Meta confirms stack verticalization, while Broadcom’s muted stock reaction despite strong AI revenue confirms investors are no longer paying equally for all AI growth.

Insider Monkey: Apollo capped redemptions in Apollo Debt Solutions, a mild stress signal for private credit/real-asset funding conditions.

Motley Fool: Realty Income coverage was generic and income-focused, not a fresh demand catalyst for the sleeve.

Benzinga: Microsoft and Nvidia team up around AI-powered nuclear energy future.

Simply Wall St.: NextEra links AI factories directly to grid infrastructure with Nvidia and Emerald AI.

Utility Dive: NextEra to develop 9.5 GW of gas generation as part of a larger federal/Japan-backed energy package.

Motley Fool/Zacks coverage frames power availability, not chips, as the next bottleneck in AI deployment.

This strengthens the prior session’s shift and is still not fully exhausted: energy is no longer just a second-order beneficiary of AI demand. The story is becoming 'power architecture is part of the AI stack,' with utilities, nuclear, and dispatchable generation acting as enabling infrastructure. That broadens winners beyond pure-play chips and supports premium narratives for grid-integrated operators.

Insider Monkey: General Dynamics secured a $15.38B Navy contract modification tied to Columbia-class submarines.

Benzinga: Honeywell signed a DoD framework agreement and committed $500M to production capacity upgrades.

Barron's: peace-talk headlines limited immediate upside for defense stocks despite ongoing contract flow.

Benzinga: Google accelerated its quantum timeline with a dual-track strategy targeting a 2030 commercial breakthrough.

Investor's Business Daily: Xanadu public debut arrives while listed quantum stocks continue to struggle in 2026.

Zacks/Simply Wall St.: IonQ retains some fundamental support, but price action remains weak after the sell-off.

Benzinga: Merck agreed to acquire Terns Pharma for about $6.7B, signaling continued appetite for pipeline replenishment.

Barron's: Gilead’s $2.2B Ouro deal reinforces strategic M&A as a growth engine.

Zacks/Insider Monkey: Eli Lilly GLP-1 franchise remains a core positive growth narrative despite 2026 drawdown.

Simply Wall St.: MARA’s story is explicitly shifting as bitcoin weakens and its AI pivot faces skepticism.

CryptoProwl: miners are losing nearly $20,000 per bitcoin produced, directly attacking unit economics.

Simply Wall St.: MARA’s Starwood data-center pivot offers optionality, but not yet enough to offset pressure on the core mining model.

Food Dive/Simply Wall St.: Coca-Cola is investing $650M to expand Fairlife, supporting category diversification and resilient cash-flow narrative.

Zacks: margin pressure remains a counterweight as pricing power normalizes.

AI & Compute and Energy & Grid are increasingly converging into a single infrastructure narrative: compute capacity without secured power is becoming less valuable.

Defense and industrial policy continue to overlap with supply-chain resilience and domestic manufacturing capacity, echoing the same 'strategic infrastructure' premium seen in AI power.

Crypto miners attempting to pivot into AI data centers highlight a spillover from AI demand, but current market skepticism suggests not all infrastructure adjacency will be rewarded.

Quantum continues to mirror AI’s maturation path: incumbents/platform owners are gaining narrative credibility faster than speculative pure plays.

Summary: Session tone is mildly risk-on at the index level, helped by lower oil and softer volatility, but the more important alpha signal is narrative selectivity. The two real story changes remain concentrated in AI infrastructure and energy: Arm’s direct-chip move with Meta and Microsoft/Nvidia’s nuclear-power alignment both reinforce that the market is rewarding scarce control points and power-secured infrastructure rather than broad AI exposure. This is a continuation and strengthening of prior shifts, not a brand-new euphoric AI leg. Quantum’s incumbent-led commercialization story also continues to build, but today’s evidence is more confirmation than fresh break. Crypto remains the weakest narrative sleeve: the prior negative shift is intact as miner economics deteriorate and AI pivots are treated skeptically. Overall, the market story is rotating from speculative growth toward strategic infrastructure with tangible bottlenecks, especially power, manufacturing capacity, and platform control.

Narrative remains the strongest positive here despite the BEAR regime. A genuine shift is underway from broad AI exposure toward scarce control points and power-secured infrastructure: Arm’s move into direct AI chips with Meta and the Microsoft/Nvidia power linkage both strengthen the thesis. Quant support is good enough to confirm the story, with solid theme-average momentum (6m 18.38%, 3m 8.86%) and slightly positive relative strength vs SPY (+0.74), led by TSM and ASML. Current portfolio drawdowns are manageable versus prior veto concerns, so this looks like a selective add rather than a broad beta chase.

Macro is still a headwind in a 100% BEAR regime with elevated VIX, and AI equity reward is clearly narrowing. Relative strength is only marginally positive at the theme level and several major constituents remain weak or in drawdown (MSFT, GOOG, META, SMCI), which argues against aggressive sizing. Risk metrics are not trivial, with 44.28% average volatility and several names above 3% daily VaR, so another veto is possible if portfolio-level risk dominates.

There are some signs of resilience in the sleeve: 3m momentum is positive at 9.55%, several names are acting well (TOL, O, SPG), and housing starts improving YoY offers a partial offset to the rate backdrop. At a low starting conviction, the theme does not need much to justify holding rather than cutting.

This is still one of the clearest macro headwinds. Restrictive rates, weak consumer sentiment, and a -0.55 macro impact score are directly negative for housing and REIT demand. Narrative is mildly negative, relative strength is below SPY (-2.38), and AMT remains a live drawdown concern from prior risk reviews. The bounce looks tactical rather than thesis-changing.

This is one of the best narrative setups in the book. The shift that 'power architecture is part of the AI stack' continues to strengthen, and it is exactly the kind of strategic infrastructure story that can work even in a selective tape. Narrative score is strong at 0.56 with a confirmed shift, macro is roughly neutral rather than hostile (+0.05), and quants are supportive: theme momentum is healthy (6m 14.76%, 3m 13.87%) with positive relative strength (+3.53), driven by NEE, UEC, and especially GEV. Compared with prior sessions, the thesis has not weakened; if anything, the narrative has broadened further.

Risk remains the main blocker. The sleeve is volatile (62.26% avg vol), concentrated enough to matter (HHI 0.1806), and still contains extreme single-name risk in SMR with 105.49% volatility, -9.87% daily VaR, and a -78.61% max drawdown. Performance is also uneven, with CEG and FSLR lagging and SMR collapsing. This is exactly the kind of increase Risk Sentinel has vetoed before, so approval risk is high despite the strong thesis.

Defense remains one of the cleanest combinations of macro resilience, positive narrative, and quant confirmation. Macro is supportive (+0.2) in a BEAR tape because spending is less cyclical, contract flow is healthy, and the sleeve has strong momentum (6m 19.96%, 3m 17.36%) with excellent relative strength (+12.85). Risk-adjusted quality is also strong, with solid Sharpe ratios across most names and limited portfolio drawdowns outside PLTR. This is the kind of durable, strategic-infrastructure exposure that should keep gaining relative appeal in a risk-off regime.

There is no fresh narrative shift this session, only continued confirmation, so the upside case is more incremental than explosive. Peace-talk headlines can cap multiple expansion, and PLTR remains the weak link with negative momentum, elevated VaR, and a -3.77% portfolio drawdown that has already been flagged in prior vetoes. Given recent rejections of a similar increase, another veto is plausible unless portfolio-level risk tolerance has improved.

The long-term story is improving at the narrative level. Google’s accelerated timeline and the broader incumbent-led commercialization path support the idea that quantum is maturing from pure speculation toward platform-backed execution. At a floor conviction of 1, maintaining optionality has merit because the narrative is better than the price action suggests.

This is still a poor setup for an increase. Macro is negative (-0.35) in a BEAR regime, 3m momentum is deeply negative (-18.37%), relative strength is very weak (-21.54), volatility is extreme (67.43%), and concentration is too high (HHI 0.3061), which has been a repeated veto trigger. The narrative is constructive, but there is no fresh enough shift to overcome the quant and risk damage.

Biotech/health has a decent fundamental narrative through continued M&A and durable therapeutic growth stories. The sleeve has some internal winners, especially LLY and CRSP, and macro is only mildly negative (-0.1), making this more resilient than high-beta growth. At current conviction, it remains a reasonable neutral hold with upside if M&A broadens.

Quant confirmation is lacking. Theme-average 3m momentum is negative (-3.97%), relative strength is poor (-13.04), and several major names are dragging badly, especially NVO. Narrative is positive but not a shift, so there is no strong catalyst to justify adding in a BEAR regime. This looks like a mixed sleeve without enough leadership breadth.

The only real bull argument is that conviction is already at the floor and some AI/data-center adjacency could eventually create optionality for select miners. Drawdowns in some prior sessions had shown temporary improvement, so reflex rallies are always possible in this kind of high-beta sleeve.

This remains the weakest theme by a wide margin. Macro impact is the most negative in the set (-0.7), narrative score is deeply negative (-0.63), and the newsflow attacks core economics rather than just sentiment. Quants are uniformly poor: 6m momentum -49.21%, 3m -24.34%, relative strength -10.99, volatility 71.58%, concentration HHI 0.3061, and severe max drawdowns across the board. Portfolio drawdowns in COIN (-9.76%) and MARA (-6.73%) remain exactly the kind of realized impairment repeatedly flagged by Risk Sentinel. If conviction could go below 1, it should.

This is the most straightforward regime-aligned increase. Macro explicitly favors defensives (+0.25) in a BEAR tape, and quants are strong: 6m momentum 23.36%, 3m 13.7%, relative strength +8.91, low volatility at 18.76%, and minimal portfolio drawdowns. The sleeve offers exactly what prior vetoes said the portfolio lacked—more protection and stability. Even without a major narrative shift, the combination of regime fit and quant quality supports a higher conviction.

The narrative is only mildly positive (0.14) and not shifting, so this is more a portfolio-construction add than an alpha-rich thematic breakout. Some components have mixed Sharpe profiles, especially PG and TLT, and if volatility continues to ease materially, defensives could lag more cyclical rebounds. Prior attempts to raise this sleeve were vetoed, so approval is not guaranteed despite the improved case.

Bullish-leaning analyst bias applied, but tempered by repeated Risk Sentinel vetoes in a persistent BEAR regime. I favored selective increases only where narrative and quants remained strong or where regime alignment clearly improved portfolio resilience.

Summary: Despite my structural bullish bias, the 100% BEAR regime and repeated prior vetoes argue for selectivity rather than broad conviction expansion. The best increase candidates are Defensive, Defense & Aerospace, and Energy & Grid, with AI & Compute also deserving a modest upgrade due to a genuine narrative shift around scarce control points and power-secured infrastructure. Real Estate and Biotech/Health stay unchanged because their signals are mixed and lack a decisive shift. Quantum remains an optionality hold only, as narrative improvement is overwhelmed by weak price action and concentration risk. Crypto & Digital remains the clear negative outlier and warrants another downward recommendation, though conviction is already pinned at the floor.

Macro headwind is negative in a firm BEAR regime (impact_score -0.25) despite decent theme momentum; this is a weak backdrop for adding long-duration growth exposure.

Theme average volatility is 44.28%, elevated for a 25% max-allocation sleeve.

Several constituents breach the 3% daily VaR threshold: AMD -5.37%, AVGO -4.13%, TSM -3.50%, SMCI -7.53%, ASML -3.72%, AMZN -3.05%, NVDA -3.73%.

Internal quality is uneven: negative/weak Sharpe in SMCI (-0.333), MSFT (-0.305), META (-0.064), and AMZN (0.099).

Live portfolio drawdowns are not severe at theme level, but MSFT (-3.31%) and GOOG (-3.34%) show the sleeve is already taking damage in the current tape.

This sleeve faces one of the strongest macro headwinds in the book (impact_score -0.55) from restrictive rates and weak consumer sentiment.

Theme relative strength is negative vs SPY (-2.38 average), indicating weak participation despite some short-term rebounds.

Multiple names exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold: DHI -3.46%, LEN -3.84%, TOL -3.11%, AMT -3.10%, RKT -5.34%.

Several live portfolio drawdowns are already present: AMT -5.32%, LEN -3.17%, DHI -3.11%, TOL -2.90%.

Risk-adjusted performance is weak in key names: LEN Sharpe -0.658, AMT -0.98, SHW -0.358.

Theme average volatility is 62.26%, one of the highest in the portfolio and inconsistent with a moderate-risk sleeve.

Multiple names materially exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold: CEG -4.66%, FSLR -5.44%, SMR -9.87%, UEC -7.04%, GEV -4.43%.

Extreme single-name risk remains unresolved in SMR: 105.49% volatility, -9.87% daily VaR, and historical max drawdown -78.61%.

The sleeve has mixed internals despite positive average momentum: SMR 6m momentum -62.59% and 3m momentum -27.80%, FSLR relative strength -23.40 vs SPY, CEG relative strength -10.91.

Prior-session risk condition has not improved materially; structural tail risk remains concentrated in the nuclear/speculative sub-sleeve.

This is one of the more resilient sleeves in the portfolio, but it is not clean enough to add aggressively in a BEAR regime.

PLTR is the main risk leak: 57.58% volatility, -5.69% daily VaR, 3m momentum -16.14%, and portfolio drawdown -3.77%.

Theme concentration HHI is 0.1834, not a formal concentration breach but relatively high versus broader sleeves.

Macro backdrop is supportive (+0.20 impact), but portfolio-level veto means even stronger sleeves should not be increased this session.

Theme concentration HHI is 0.3061, breaching the 0.25 concentration threshold.

Macro headwind is strongly negative (impact_score -0.35) and 3m theme momentum is deeply negative at -18.37%, a double flag under current rules.

Theme average relative strength is -21.54 vs SPY, showing severe underperformance.

Theme average volatility is 67.43%; IONQ and RGTI are extreme at 96.14% and 109.65%.

Daily VaR is far above threshold in IONQ (-8.17%), RGTI (-8.78%), and IBM (-3.16%).

Historical drawdown profile is unacceptable for expansion in this regime: IONQ -62.93%, RGTI -73.59% max drawdown.

Macro impact is only mildly negative (-0.10), but the sleeve is not acting defensive enough: theme relative strength is -13.04 vs SPY.

Theme average volatility is 44.38%, elevated for a moderate-risk sleeve.

Several names exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold: LLY -3.59%, NVO -4.70%, CRSP -6.17%.

Internal quality is weak in important holdings: NVO Sharpe -1.094, ISRG -0.269, ABBV 0.023.

3m theme momentum is negative (-3.97), suggesting weakening trend under a BEAR tape.

This sleeve faces the strongest macro headwind in the portfolio (impact_score -0.70) in a firm BEAR/risk-off regime.

Theme momentum is decisively negative: 6m -49.21% and 3m -24.34%.

Theme average volatility is 71.58%, with MARA 82.23%, COIN 75.16%, and MSTR 74.78%.

All constituents exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold: COIN -6.58%, MSTR -7.61%, MARA -8.31%, XYZ -5.27%.

This sleeve has the deepest realized capital impairment in the portfolio: COIN portfolio drawdown -9.76%, MARA -6.73%, XYZ -2.40%.

Risk-adjusted performance is poor: MSTR Sharpe -0.939, MARA -0.325, COIN only 0.136.

Prior-session improvement has reversed; realized drawdowns are worsening again, which is a key negative change versus the last veto review.

This is the cleanest sleeve in the book and is behaving as intended in the BEAR regime.

No constituent breaches the 3% daily VaR threshold; theme average volatility is only 18.76%.

Relative strength is positive across the sleeve on average (+8.91 vs SPY), supporting its hedge role.

Only caution: TLT Sharpe is negative (-0.746) and PG Sharpe is negative (-0.847), so the sleeve is not uniformly strong.

Crypto & Digital has the most serious realized capital impairment: COIN portfolio drawdown -9.76% and MARA -6.73%.

Real Estate is accumulating live losses in a macro-hostile sleeve: AMT -5.32%, LEN -3.17%, DHI -3.11%, TOL -2.90%.

AI & Compute has moderate live losses in large-cap core names: GOOG -3.34% and MSFT -3.31%.

Defense & Aerospace PLTR remains the main leak in an otherwise resilient sleeve at -3.77% portfolio drawdown.

Quantum live drawdowns are smaller than crypto, but the sleeve remains structurally dangerous given concentration and extreme VaR.

Summary: Risk posture remains defensive. Portfolio risk is elevated to veto territory because the regime is unequivocally BEAR and persistent, while the same structural problems flagged in prior sessions remain unresolved: concentrated speculative sleeves, repeated VaR breaches, and worsening realized losses in crypto. There is no portfolio-level correlation crisis, but that does not offset the combination of regime risk, high-volatility sleeves, and live capital impairment. Defense_aerospace and defensive are the only relatively stable areas; however, under a portfolio veto, no conviction increases should be approved. Priority actions are to avoid adding risk, cut crypto_digital and quantum exposure, trim high-beta energy_grid and rate-sensitive real_estate, and maintain at least a 4 conviction floor in defensive.

Summary: VETOED: Portfolio-level risk remains in veto territory. The market regime is firmly BEAR with 100% confidence, 10-day persistence, and 0.98 BEAR->BEAR continuation. Prior veto conditions have not improved enough: speculative sleeves remain over-concentrated (quantum HHI 0.3061, crypto_digital HHI 0.3061 > 0.25), multiple themes still exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold, energy_grid still carries extreme single-name risk (SMR 105.49% vol, -9.87% daily VaR), and realized capital impairment in crypto_digital has worsened again (COIN portfolio drawdown -9.76%, MARA -6.73%). No conviction increases should be approved this session.. Only conviction decreases applied.

Summary: 21 orders, 14 sells, 7 buys, turnover 7.76%, regime sizing 50%