Market regime is firmly BEAR (99.6% confidence) with 18 days persistence and very high BEAR->BEAR continuation (0.98). This implies sustained risk-off positioning and tighter financial conditions despite some easing in the yield curve (T10Y2Y spread_pct 0.5%, not inverted).

Fed policy remains restrictive: fed funds at 3.64% is still meaningfully above typical pre-pandemic neutral levels, and the BEAR regime suggests markets are not pricing a rapid, durable easing cycle.

Inflation is moderating but not fully resolved: CPI YoY is 2.66% (Feb 2026), which is closer to target than earlier peaks, but still high enough to keep policy cautious in a risk-off tape.

Growth looks resilient on the headline: GDP YoY is 5.42% (Oct 2025). However, weekly labor pulse is weakening: initial jobless claims rose to 202k vs 214k prior month (directionally mixed without unemployment/claims trend context), and the BEAR regime indicates markets are discounting future growth risk.

Explanation: BEAR regime and risk-off conditions typically compress high-multiple growth/infra equities; even with GDP strength, elevated risk appetite constraints (regime BEAR) are a headwind. The lack of VIX/consumer/housing data prevents a stronger negative, but the macro tape still favors defensives over aggressive capex beta.

Explanation: Real estate is rate-sensitive and fed funds at 3.64% plus a BEAR regime is a direct headwind for housing/REIT demand. Housing starts are missing, so the score is driven by policy/risk regime rather than confirmed construction weakness.

Explanation: Grid infrastructure can be supported by long-duration capex narratives, but BEAR risk-off tends to raise discount rates and reduce appetite for cyclical infrastructure. With CPI only 2.66% YoY (not re-accelerating), inflation-driven tailwinds are muted.

Explanation: Defense is relatively macro-insensitive versus growth/rate-sensitive themes, so the BEAR regime is less damaging. Without fiscal/geopolitical spending inputs, the net effect is near-neutral; restrictive financial conditions may still pressure valuations slightly.

Explanation: Quantum is high-risk/high-volatility and typically suffers most in BEAR regimes as capital rotates to safety and liquidity tightens. Missing VIX data limits precision, but the persistent BEAR state plus prior session stress context implies a strong macro headwind.

Explanation: Biotech has some defensive characteristics (health demand durability) and can benefit from secular tailwinds, so macro headwinds are smaller than for pure growth. Still, BEAR risk-off can pressure funding/valuations, and inflation is only moderately contained (2.66% YoY).

Explanation: Crypto is highly sensitive to liquidity and risk appetite; a BEAR regime with restrictive policy is a strong headwind. VIX is missing, but the regime classification itself signals elevated risk aversion consistent with crypto underperformance.

Explanation: Defensive/hedge themes typically benefit in BEAR regimes as investors seek stability and downside protection. With CPI at 2.66% YoY (not surging) and the yield curve not inverted (T10Y2Y spread_pct 0.5%), the macro backdrop supports defensives more than cyclicals.

Risk-off persistence: BEAR regime at 99.6% confidence with 18-day persistence and BEAR->BEAR continuation probability of 0.98 suggests further multiple compression is likely across growth/speculative themes.

Policy/discount-rate risk: fed funds at 3.64% keeps financial conditions restrictive even as CPI cools to 2.66% YoY, which can continue to pressure long-duration assets (ai_compute, quantum, crypto_digital).

Recession signaling not confirmed but growth risk remains: T10Y2Y is not inverted (spread_pct 0.5%), yet the market is still BEAR—implying investors may be anticipating future deterioration not captured by current GDP (5.42% YoY).

Summary: Despite moderating inflation (CPI 2.66% YoY) and solid headline GDP growth (5.42% YoY), the macro regime is firmly BEAR (99.6% confidence), indicating sustained risk-off and restrictive financial conditions (fed funds 3.64%). Net effect: strongest headwinds for high-beta/speculative themes (crypto_digital, quantum, real_estate), while defensives show the best relative tailwind.

Intel Lands Musk’s $25 Billion Terafab: A Billion-Dollar Foundry Win in the Making?

Intel in talks with Google, Amazon amid advanced packaging push, Wired says

Broadcom TPU Deals Extend 'Multi-Year AI Supply Visibility': Analyst

Anthropic ups compute deal with Google and Broadcom amid skyrocketing demand

Arista Upgraded To Buy On Google, Anthropic Data Center Orders

ASML Caught In Crossfire As US-China Chip War Escalates

Intel Stock Surges 2% As Elon Musk Partnership Targets 1 Terawatt Of AI Power

The Grid Can't Keep Up. These 2 Utility Stocks Are the Buys of the Month.

Rising AI Power Demand And Nuclear Fuel Deal Might Change The Case For Investing In GE Vernova (GEV)

Buy 3 Nuclear Energy Stocks for 2026 Amid AI-Powered Data Center Boom

Defense Stocks Can’t Get a Boost From Iran War Escalations. What Would Move Them.

Trump's $2.2T proposed defense budget boosts Lockheed Martin's outlook

8 Big Winners From Trump’s Historic $1.5 Trillion Defense Request

Pentagon Budget Requests 85 F-35 Jets, Lifts Defense Spending 42%

Can Rigetti Computing's USask Deal Boost Its Quantum Growth Story?

UnitedHealth, Humana, CVS Jump As CMS Boosts Medicare Payments

Humana, UnitedHealth Stocks Pop After Medicare Surprise — ETFs In Focus

Merck Commences Cash Tender Offer to Acquire All Outstanding Shares of Terns Pharmaceuticals for $53.00 Per Share

Are AI giants coming for bitcoin miners' power?

MARA Sold 15,133 Bitcoins to Escape the Mining Trap. Now Comes the Hard Part

Popular miner lays off 15% of staff days after selling $1.1 billion in Bitcoin

MARA Moves Beyond Bitcoin With $1.1 Billion Sale

Strategy's Capital Strategy Drives BTC Growth: Is Upside Sustainable?

Can Coca-Cola Balance Pricing, Affordability in Soft Macro Backdrop?

Bullish Stock Market Positioning Confronts 'A Whole Civilization Will Probably Die Tonight'

Microsoft Is Now The Biggest Deadweight On S&P 500 — And Exxon Is What Nvidia Used To Be

Anthropic ups compute deal with Google and Broadcom amid skyrocketing demand (TechCrunch)

Broadcom TPU Deals Extend 'Multi-Year AI Supply Visibility': Analyst (Benzinga)

Intel Lands Musk’s $25 Billion Terafab: A Billion-Dollar Foundry Win in the Making? (24/7 Wall St.)

ASML Caught In Crossfire As US-China Chip War Escalates (Benzinga)

Extension of the prior session’s verticalization thesis: the story is no longer just custom AI chips and packaging scarcity, but binding long-duration demand commitments to power-intensive compute buildout. AI is increasingly being narrated as an industrial utility stack—TPUs/networking/packaging/power—rather than a pure semis momentum trade.

This One ETF Gives Retirees Quiet Exposure to AI Infrastructure REITs (24/7 Wall St.)

As Meta Doubles Down on Data Center Investment, AMD and American Tower Could Be the Top Stocks to Buy (Barchart)

Intel Stock Surges 2% As Elon Musk Partnership Targets 1 Terawatt Of AI Power (Benzinga)

Rising AI Power Demand And Nuclear Fuel Deal Might Change The Case For Investing In GE Vernova (GEV) (Simply Wall St.)

Are AI giants coming for bitcoin miners' power? (CoinDesk)

Material strengthening of the 'power is the bottleneck' narrative. This is a genuine story change because AI demand is now visibly competing with other digital infrastructure for scarce electricity, moving grid/nuclear exposure from secondary beneficiary to primary gating asset.

Defense Stocks Can’t Get a Boost From Iran War Escalations. What Would Move Them. (Barrons.com)

Trump's $2.2T proposed defense budget boosts Lockheed Martin's outlook (TheStreet)

Pentagon Budget Requests 85 F-35 Jets, Lifts Defense Spending 42% (GuruFocus.com)

Despite escalating Iran headlines and larger budget rhetoric, defense equities are not cleanly responding. The narrative is shifting from 'geopolitical escalation automatically lifts defense' toward 'investors require funded procurement visibility, not just war headlines.' That tempers reflexive bullishness.

Can Rigetti Computing's USask Deal Boost Its Quantum Growth Story? (Zacks)

UnitedHealth, Humana, CVS Jump As CMS Boosts Medicare Payments (Benzinga)

Humana, UnitedHealth Stocks Pop After Medicare Surprise — ETFs In Focus (Benzinga)

Merck Commences Cash Tender Offer to Acquire All Outstanding Shares of Terns Pharmaceuticals for $53.00 Per Share (Benzinga)

MARA Sold 15,133 Bitcoins to Escape the Mining Trap. Now Comes the Hard Part (24/7 Wall St.)

Popular miner lays off 15% of staff days after selling $1.1 billion in Bitcoin (TheStreet)

Strategy's Capital Strategy Drives BTC Growth: Is Upside Sustainable? (Zacks)

This materially evolves the prior session’s bullish 'regulated financial integration' shift. The new sub-narrative is bifurcation: crypto rails may be institutionalizing, but crypto mining is being structurally displaced by AI for power and infrastructure. Bullish for financialized crypto access, bearish for miner-equity business models.

Bullish Stock Market Positioning Confronts 'A Whole Civilization Will Probably Die Tonight' (Benzinga)

Can Coca-Cola Balance Pricing, Affordability in Soft Macro Backdrop? (Zacks)

AI compute demand is tightening the link between ai_compute and energy_grid: compute wins now imply power scarcity and favor grid/nuclear enablers.

A new competitive overlap is forming between ai_compute and crypto_digital: AI buyers are bidding for the same power capacity that miners historically consumed.

Defense and energy are now partially coupled through Iran/Strait of Hormuz risk: geopolitical escalation supports oil and urgency around domestic power resilience more than it automatically boosts defense equities.

Digital infrastructure real estate remains a second-order beneficiary of AI buildout, but the stronger immediate narrative leadership has shifted upstream to power and chip packaging rather than REIT wrappers.

Summary: Narrative tone remains slightly risk-off, consistent with the prior BEAR regime, but the most important story is not broad fear—it is bottleneck migration. The AI narrative is strengthening, yet leadership is rotating away from generic front-end AI beta toward industrial enablers: packaging, custom silicon, networking, and especially power. The clearest fresh shift this session is that electricity scarcity is becoming explicit, with AI compute now competing against crypto mining for infrastructure. That is bullish energy_grid, selectively bullish ai_compute, and bearish crypto miners. A secondary shift appears in defense: war headlines alone are no longer enough; markets want procurement-backed revenue visibility. Overall, the market story is becoming more discriminating and infrastructure-centric, not broadly bullish.

Narrative remains the strongest positive in the book: hyperscaler/custom-silicon demand is broadening into a longer-duration 'compute industrial base' story spanning packaging, foundry capacity, networking, and power. Multiple high-relevance catalysts support durable demand visibility, and the narrative shift is real. Quant is mixed rather than broken: 6m momentum is positive at the theme level, with clear leadership in TSM, ASML, AMD, and GOOG.

Macro is still a headwind in a deeply persistent BEAR regime, and recent price action does not fully confirm the narrative: 3m momentum is negative and average relative strength vs SPY is slightly negative. Prior +1 proposals were vetoed, and conditions have not improved enough to justify re-pressing the same increase in a risk-off tape. This remains a selective stock-picker theme, not broad-based confirmation.

There are pockets of resilience in REIT-linked digital infrastructure and select income names, with O, SPG, and AMT showing decent relative strength. If rates stabilize further, the deeply depressed baseline could allow selective recovery.

Macro is clearly unfavorable: real estate is one of the most rate-sensitive themes and carries a strong negative macro impact score. Quant is weak overall with negative 6m and 3m average momentum, and the narrative is only mildly positive without a true shift. No reason to add risk here, but conviction is already at floor.

This is one of the clearest narrative upgrades in the dataset. Power scarcity is becoming explicit, and AI demand is elevating grid/nuclear infrastructure from secondary beneficiary to primary bottleneck asset. GEV and NEE provide meaningful quant confirmation with strong momentum, strong relative strength, and solid Sharpe, while the macro headwind is only mild versus other cyclical themes.

The theme remains too internally unstable to increase now. Average 3m momentum is sharply negative, average relative strength is still below SPY, volatility is high, and SMR remains in severe realized drawdown breach despite modest improvement from prior sessions. Given repeated vetoes tied specifically to energy_grid drawdown stress, a fresh +1 would likely be blocked again unless the weak tail materially heals.

This is one of the best quant profiles in the universe: strong 6m and 3m momentum, positive relative strength, low-to-moderate volatility, and consistently strong Sharpe across core primes. Macro is near-neutral to slightly supportive on a relative basis in a BEAR regime, and procurement/budget headlines remain fundamentally constructive.

The key narrative shift is cautionary: geopolitical escalation alone is no longer enough to lift the group, and markets want funded procurement visibility. Prior +1 attempts were vetoed, and while PLTR drawdown has improved somewhat from prior warning levels, it is still a live risk pocket inside the sleeve. Strong theme, but not enough change in conditions to re-argue for an increase this session.

There is still optionality around early partnerships and any future breakthrough cycle, and GOOG/IBM provide some ballast versus pure-spec names. If risk appetite returns, this theme can re-rate quickly.

This is still the weakest combination of macro, narrative, and risk in the set. Macro headwind is severe, narrative support is minimal with no meaningful positive shift, 3m momentum is deeply negative, relative strength is extremely poor, concentration is above risk thresholds, and realized drawdowns remain severe despite slight improvement from the last session. This remains structurally unfit for higher conviction.

Policy/newsflow is constructive with Medicare payment support and ongoing M&A, and macro headwinds are relatively mild versus other growth themes. The sector retains defensive demand characteristics and secular innovation optionality.

Quant does not confirm a turn: 3m momentum is negative, relative strength is notably weak, and performance is uneven with major dispersion across holdings. Prior +1 was vetoed and there is not enough improvement to revisit it. Positive narrative, but not a clean enough setup for a conviction increase in this regime.

There is still a longer-term institutionalization angle for crypto rails and brokerage/custody integration, and XYZ shows some near-term resilience. If liquidity conditions improve, the group could rebound violently from depressed levels.

The new narrative shift is negative for the current equity basket: mining economics are being structurally pressured by AI's competition for power and infrastructure. Macro is the worst in the set, momentum is deeply negative across the sleeve, relative strength is poor, volatility and VaR are extreme, concentration breaches remain unresolved, and prior sessions repeatedly vetoed any increase. This is a clear avoid/reduce signal, though conviction is already floored.

This remains the cleanest alignment of macro and quant. In a persistent BEAR regime, defensives have the strongest macro tailwind, positive 6m and 3m momentum, strong relative strength, low volatility, manageable VaR, and shallow drawdowns. Healthcare payor support and geopolitical anxiety both reinforce the hedge/stability role.

At conviction 9, much of the case is already expressed. Narrative is supportive but not undergoing a fresh major shift, and some components like TLT and PG are not contributing strongly. Upside from here is more about capital preservation than explosive alpha, so there is limited need to push to max conviction.

Bullish-leaning analyst held back by persistent BEAR regime and repeated risk veto history; preference is to preserve optionality in narrative winners without re-proposing increases where drawdown and regime conditions still block approval.

Summary: Net stance is restrained bullish selectivity, not broad risk addition. The strongest narrative developments remain in ai_compute and especially energy_grid, where AI demand is migrating the bottleneck toward power infrastructure; however, repeated veto history and unresolved risk stress argue against fresh conviction increases today. Defense_aerospace continues to screen well quantitatively but lacks enough incremental change to overcome prior veto dynamics. The only clear negative deltas remain quantum and crypto_digital, where macro, concentration, volatility, and realized drawdown stress still dominate. Defensive stays the preferred high-conviction posture in the current regime.

Macro headwind remains negative in a firm BEAR regime (impact_score -0.35).

Theme 3m momentum is negative at -3.43% and relative strength vs SPY is -2.7%, showing weakening tape despite mixed 6m performance.

Theme average volatility is high at 43.59%; several names exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold including NVDA (-3.54%), AMD (-5.07%), AVGO (-3.84%), TSM (-3.22%), SMCI (-6.53%), and ASML (-3.73%).

Realized stress is building in select names: SMCI portfolio drawdown is -7.11%, ASML -7.38%, META -5.85%, though no theme-level drawdown cap breach yet versus 15% limit.

This is one of the strongest macro headwinds in the book (impact_score -0.55) given restrictive Fed stance and BEAR regime.

Theme momentum is weak: 6m average -8.22% and 3m average -3.28%; relative strength vs SPY is also negative at -2.04%.

Multiple names exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold: DHI (-3.38%), LEN (-3.84%), and RKT (-5.12%).

LEN portfolio drawdown is -8.86%, only 1.14 percentage points from the theme max-drawdown cap of 10%, creating a live near-breach condition.

Active drawdown breach: SMR portfolio drawdown is -20.13%, far through the theme max-drawdown limit of 12%.

Secondary realized stress is also meaningful: CEG is -11.17%, only 0.83 percentage points from the same 12% cap; UEC is -5.08% and FSLR -4.47%.

Theme average volatility is very high at 61.12%, with extreme daily VaR in SMR (-9.59%), UEC (-7.05%), FSLR (-5.34%), CEG (-4.55%), and GEV (-4.29%).

Momentum is deteriorating: 3m theme average is -10.51% and relative strength vs SPY is -6.55%, a poor setup under a BEAR regime.

This is one of the healthier sleeves, but conviction is already high at 5 with a 12% max allocation cap, limiting room for error in a BEAR tape.

PLTR is the weak link: 3m momentum is -11.67%, daily VaR is -5.57%, and portfolio drawdown is -7.72%, only 2.28 percentage points from the theme max-drawdown cap of 10%.

Theme concentration HHI is 0.1834, not a breach, but elevated conviction plus single-name stress in PLTR argues against adding risk aggressively.

Theme concentration breach: HHI is 0.3061, above the 0.25 concentration threshold.

Macro headwind is severe (impact_score -0.65) and momentum is collapsing: 3m theme average is -25.11% with relative strength vs SPY at -23.5%.

Theme average volatility is extreme at 66.88%; daily VaR is far above threshold in IONQ (-7.99%), RGTI (-8.78%), and IBM (-3.03%).

Realized losses remain severe: IONQ portfolio drawdown is -15.77% and RGTI is -13.70%. These are below the 25% theme cap but are worsening and remain concentrated in a high-risk sleeve.

Prior-session veto condition has not improved; drawdown stress remains materially elevated.

Relative strength is poor at -14.07% vs SPY and 3m momentum is negative at -7.61%, indicating weak participation even in a partially defensive sector.

Theme average volatility is high at 43.73%; daily VaR exceeds 3% in LLY (-3.52%), NVO (-4.37%), and CRSP (-5.87%).

Biotech concentration is not yet a breach, but HHI at 0.2231 is getting closer to the 0.25 threshold than most other diversified sleeves.

Several names show weak risk-adjusted performance, including NVO Sharpe -0.836 and ISRG Sharpe -0.08.

Macro headwind is the worst in the portfolio (impact_score -0.7) under a restrictive-policy BEAR regime.

Momentum is decisively negative: 6m theme average -38.27%, 3m average -21.3%, and relative strength vs SPY -15.58%.

Theme average volatility is extreme at 70.74%; all names exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold: COIN (-6.48%), MSTR (-7.31%), MARA (-7.71%), XYZ (-5.16%).

Realized drawdown stress remains acute: COIN portfolio drawdown is -14.03% and MSTR is -11.27%, with no evidence of stabilization versus prior veto sessions.

This is the strongest relative sleeve in the current regime: 3m momentum is 11.19% and relative strength vs SPY is 11.56%.

Theme average volatility is low at 17.93%, and no constituent breaches the 3% daily VaR threshold.

No drawdown stress is present relative to the conservative 5% theme cap; the worst current portfolio drawdown is GLD at -2.28%.

Energy_grid breach: SMR portfolio drawdown is -20.13%, exceeding the theme max-drawdown limit of 12%.

Energy_grid warning: CEG portfolio drawdown is -11.17%, only 0.83 percentage points from the 12% theme limit.

Real_estate warning: LEN portfolio drawdown is -8.86%, only 1.14 percentage points from the 10% theme limit.

Quantum stress: IONQ portfolio drawdown is -15.77% and RGTI is -13.70%, showing persistent realized losses in a concentrated speculative sleeve.

Crypto_digital stress: COIN portfolio drawdown is -14.03% and MSTR is -11.27%, indicating ongoing realized loss concentration.

Defense_aerospace warning: PLTR portfolio drawdown is -7.72%, only 2.28 percentage points from the 10% theme limit.

Summary: Risk remains decisively elevated at the portfolio level and still warrants a veto on any conviction increases. The key driver is not broad correlation concentration—cross-theme correlations are benign—but a dangerous combination of persistent BEAR regime conditions, unresolved speculative-sleeve concentration breaches, repeated VaR excesses, and live realized drawdown breaches. Energy_grid is in active violation via SMR, while quantum and crypto_digital remain the most fragile sleeves with both concentration and loss stress still unresolved across multiple sessions. Defense_aerospace and defensive are the only relatively stable areas, but that stability is not enough to offset the portfolio’s tail-risk profile. Maintain or increase defense only within existing risk controls; reduce or exit the most stressed speculative exposures.

Summary: VETOED: Portfolio-level risk remains in veto territory. The market regime is firmly BEAR with 99.6% confidence, 18-day persistence, and a 0.98 BEAR->BEAR continuation probability. The prior veto conditions have not been resolved: quantum and crypto_digital still breach concentration limits (HHI 0.3061 > 0.25), multiple sleeves still carry daily VaR well above the 3% threshold, and realized drawdown stress remains severe in speculative and cyclical positions. Energy_grid still has an active drawdown breach with SMR at -20.13% versus the theme max-drawdown limit of 12%. Quantum remains deeply stressed with IONQ at -15.77% and RGTI at -13.70% portfolio drawdowns, while crypto_digital remains acutely stressed with COIN at -14.03% and MSTR at -11.27%. No conviction increases should be approved this session.. Only conviction decreases applied.

Summary: 22 orders, 8 risk exits, 8 sells, 6 buys, turnover 5.68%, regime sizing 50%


HMM market regime is firmly BEAR (99.7% confidence; 18-day persistence; BEAR->BEAR continuation prob 0.98). Macro risk is consistent with a risk-off tape: VIX is elevated at 24.17 and consumer sentiment has fallen YoY (UMCSENT 56.6 vs 64.7 prior year).

Restrictive/hold-high: Fed funds at 3.64% remains meaningfully above zero, and with CPI still positive at 2.66% YoY, policy is likely not rapidly easing. Yield curve is not inverted now (T10Y2Y spread +0.5%), but the BEAR regime suggests markets are still pricing growth/risk stress despite the curve normalization.

Cooling but not broken: CPI YoY at 2.66% indicates inflation is moderating versus typical peaks, but it is not low enough to guarantee aggressive cuts. Elevated VIX (24.17) implies inflation uncertainty/risk premia remain.

Mixed-to-soft: unemployment is slightly higher (4.3% vs 4.2% prior year) and consumer sentiment is weaker, while manufacturing employment proxy is unusually high/possibly not directly comparable (MANEMP value provided without units). Net: growth impulse looks fragile, aligning with the BEAR regime rather than a clean re-acceleration.

Explanation: Risk-off BEAR regime and elevated VIX (24.17) typically pressure high-multiple growth/tech beta, but the macro backdrop is not purely recessionary (10Y-2Y is +0.5%). Moderate headwind from sentiment weakness (UMCSENT down YoY) offsets some resilience from ongoing infrastructure demand.

Explanation: Rates remain restrictive (Fed funds 3.64%) and consumer sentiment is deteriorating (56.6 vs 64.7), both headwinds for housing/construction demand. With housing starts missing, the score leans on rates + sentiment, which are clearly unfavorable.

Explanation: Grid/energy is a structural capex beneficiary, but BEAR risk-off and elevated volatility (VIX 24.17) can compress long-duration infrastructure valuations. Inflation is not surging (CPI 2.66% YoY), so the theme lacks a strong inflation/boom tailwind.

Explanation: Defense is relatively macro-insensitive, and the yield curve is not inverted (+0.5%), reducing recession-driven discount-rate stress. However, BEAR conditions and weaker consumer sentiment can still weigh on broad equity risk appetite, making this only mildly negative.

Explanation: Quantum is high-beta/high-risk and tends to underperform in BEAR regimes with elevated volatility (VIX 24.17). Even though inflation is moderate (CPI 2.66%), the risk-off tape dominates.

Explanation: Health/biotech has some defensiveness, but it is still equity-duration sensitive under BEAR conditions. With unemployment slightly higher (4.3%) and consumer sentiment weaker, demand/financing conditions are less supportive, though not catastrophic.

Explanation: Crypto is highly sensitive to liquidity/risk appetite; BEAR regime plus elevated VIX (24.17) is a direct headwind. With consumer sentiment down YoY and no clear easing impulse from policy (Fed funds 3.64%), the macro backdrop is unfavorable.

Explanation: Defensive/hedge themes benefit from risk-off conditions: BEAR regime and elevated VIX (24.17) typically rotate capital toward stability. Inflation is not accelerating (CPI 2.66% YoY), supporting defensives more than growth.

Volatility/tail risk remains elevated: VIX at 24.17 signals persistent risk-off conditions that can overwhelm theme-specific fundamentals.

Recession/growth scare is still plausible despite curve normalization: unemployment is drifting up (4.3% vs 4.2% YoY) while consumer sentiment is weakening (UMCSENT 56.6 vs 64.7), consistent with tightening financial conditions.

Policy easing is not clearly imminent: CPI at 2.66% YoY with Fed funds at 3.64% suggests limited near-term rate relief, which is especially damaging for rate-sensitive themes like real estate.

Summary: Macro conditions are consistent with a sustained BEAR regime: elevated VIX (24.17), weaker consumer sentiment (UMCSENT 56.6 vs 64.7 YoY), and slightly worsening labor (UNRATE 4.3%). Net effect: strongest headwinds for high-beta/risk assets (crypto_digital, quantum, real_estate), mild defensiveness tailwind for Defensive/hedge, and only partial resilience for AI compute and energy_grid given the risk-off tape.

Anthropic touts AI cybersecurity project with Big Tech partners

Broadcom TPU Deals Extend 'Multi-Year AI Supply Visibility': Analyst

Intel Stock Surges 2% As Elon Musk Partnership Targets 1 Terawatt Of AI Power

Oil Surges To $115, Stocks Slide As Trump Deadline Looms: What's Moving Markets Tuesday?

4 charts Wall Street is nervously watching as US war on Iran rages on

Fertilizer Prices Are Surging, and Food Costs Could Be Next. Why the Iran Energy Shock Runs Much Deeper Than Your Gas Bill

What Nvidia and Broadcom need to get back on track

Mag 7 needs Q2 revenue growth in order to 'justify' massive capex

Magnificent Seven Are Cracking – Goldman Sees A Tech Value Opportunity That Hasn't Existed Since the 1970s

3 Energy Stocks to Buy as AI Power Demand Surges—and 2 to Avoid

Palantir Could Be First Mover in Defense AI -- Oracle, Microsoft to Follow

Palantir Faces UK Boycott As Maven And NHS Deals Reshape Outlook

Boeing Delivers ViaSat-3 Satellite Ahead Of SpaceX Launch

What International Business Machines (IBM)'s Arm AI Hardware and GovCloud Push Means For Shareholders

AI-Quantum Supercycle: 4 Stocks to Watch in April With 50%+ Upside

UnitedHealth, Humana, CVS Jump As CMS Boosts Medicare Payments

Humana, UnitedHealth Stocks Pop After Medicare Surprise — ETFs In Focus

Merck Lowered Terns Pharmaceuticals Offer Price After Trial Data Review

Strategy Reports $14.5 Billion Loss As Bitcoin Falls Over 20%

Bitcoin, XRP Prices Drop. Why the Strategy Shine Is Wearing Off for Cryptos.

Morning Minute: Ceasefire Hopes Rise, Fall Along with Bitcoin

Strategy's $330 Million Bitcoin Buy Boosts Crypto as Investors Await Iran Deal

Gold Steadies With Dollar Little Changed as Inflation Worries Persist Amid War In Iran

Gold Edges Higher as the Dollar Weakened After the U.S. Offers Iran a 45-Day Ceasefire

Realty Income Insider Sales And Leadership Change Versus Valuation Discount

Realty Income Funding Moves And Valuation Signal Potential Upside For Investors

Intel/Terafab 1-terawatt AI power headline reinforces compute buildout as an industrial-scale power problem rather than a pure chip cycle.

Broadcom TPU deal commentary extends prior custom-stack/verticalization narrative with multi-year demand visibility.

Anthropic Project Glasswing adds evidence that frontier AI models are being productized into security and enterprise/government workflows.

Counterweight: Mag 7 capex-justification scrutiny and semiconductor divergence show investors are demanding monetization, not just spend.

Oil-at-$115 / Iran-war macro shock raises inflation and rate-pressure concerns, a mild headwind for rate-sensitive real estate.

Realty Income-specific news is mixed: efficient funding/joint venture activity offsets insider selling and leadership turnover.

No fresh housing-demand or construction impulse in the feed; macro dominates idiosyncratic positives.

Intel joining Terafab with a 1-terawatt AI power target materially strengthens the idea that power availability is becoming the binding constraint for AI scaling.

Multiple articles continue linking AI demand directly to grid, nuclear, and industrial power infrastructure.

Offset: SMR/NuScale-specific skepticism remains severe, suggesting the theme is stronger than some of its speculative equity expressions.

This is an evolution of the prior 'power is the bottleneck' shift into something more concrete: AI power demand is now being framed in terawatt-scale industrial terms. The story is moving from abstract scarcity to explicit capacity planning, which favors grid, utility, and proven infrastructure beneficiaries over concept-stage nuclear beta.

Palantir first-mover defense AI commentary supports software-centric defense modernization.

Anthropic cybersecurity partnership with Microsoft, Nvidia, CrowdStrike, Palo Alto and others blurs the line between AI infrastructure and national-security cyber capability.

Boeing satellite delivery is modestly supportive for aerospace execution.

Offset: UK boycott headlines around Palantir show political/ethical friction can cap narrative enthusiasm.

IBM's stack narrative—AI hardware, GovCloud, cyber, and quantum materials simulation—supports credible incumbent-led quantum adjacency.

Quantum coverage remains mostly promotional and low-signal versus the broader risk backdrop.

Given prior-session drawdown stress and lack of a true breakthrough catalyst, narrative improvement is only marginal.

CMS Medicare payment boost is a real policy tailwind for managed-care and broader healthcare sentiment.

Merck/Terns price revision after data review is a reminder that biotech valuation remains data-sensitive and selective.

No major new GLP-1 or CRISPR narrative change versus prior session; supportive but not transformative.

Bitcoin weakness tied to Iran-war risk and ceasefire headlines reinforces crypto's current behavior as a high-beta macro risk asset, not a safe haven.

Strategy's $14.5B unrealized loss and questions around sustainability of its funding-driven BTC accumulation weaken the equity-wrapper narrative.

Even with continued BTC buying, the market is less impressed by accumulation optics and more focused on balance-sheet volatility.

This extends the prior bifurcation story. The market narrative is shifting further away from 'institutionalization makes crypto resilient' toward 'crypto remains hostage to macro/geopolitical liquidity conditions.' Financialized crypto access is not insulating the asset from risk-off shocks; if anything, leverage and treasury-style wrappers are amplifying fragility.

Gold holding firm despite shifting ceasefire headlines and inflation concerns supports continued demand for hedges.

War-driven oil spike and equity weakness reinforce the utility of defensive sleeves.

The fact that gold is steady rather than explosively higher tempers the score, but the hedge narrative remains intact.

AI compute and energy_grid are increasingly inseparable: terawatt-scale AI ambitions are turning power procurement and grid capacity into first-order determinants of compute winners.

Geopolitical escalation is creating a barbell: supportive for defensive hedges and select defense software, but negative for crypto and rate-sensitive real estate.

Within speculative tech, the market is rewarding credible infrastructure depth (Broadcom/IBM/power enablers) over narrative-rich but balance-sheet-fragile expressions (MSTR, concept nuclear, high-beta quantum).

Summary: Session tone is risk-off with a mild structural bearish bias reinforced by Iran-driven oil shock and inflation anxiety. The most important evolving story is not simply 'AI is bullish' but that AI is becoming an industrial power-and-infrastructure buildout, with terawatt language making the energy bottleneck more concrete than in prior sessions. That strengthens energy_grid more than generic AI beta. The second material shift is in crypto: rather than decoupling through institutional adoption, it is behaving more like a leveraged macro-risk asset, with Strategy-style wrappers amplifying rather than dampening volatility. Elsewhere, defense remains modestly constructive through AI/cyber modernization, biotech gets a policy lift without a new story change, and defensive hedges continue to earn their role.

Narrative remains structurally constructive: AI is still evolving from a chip cycle into an industrial compute buildout, with Broadcom TPU visibility, Anthropic enterprise/security adoption, and terawatt-scale power framing supporting durable demand. Quant is mixed rather than broken: 6m theme momentum is positive at 10.15%, with strong leadership in TSM and ASML and solid Sharpe across several core names.

This is exactly the kind of theme that keeps getting vetoed in the current BEAR regime. Macro is a mild headwind, 3m momentum is negative (-3.43%), average relative strength vs SPY is negative (-2.92%), and several mega-cap proxies are rolling over. Prior +1 proposals were vetoed twice, and the underlying portfolio-level risk backdrop has not improved enough to justify re-upping the same increase.

At a very low starting conviction, there are pockets of resilience: O, SPG, and AMT show positive relative strength and decent recent momentum, suggesting income-oriented real estate is holding up better than homebuilders and mortgage exposure. Mixed company-specific funding/valuation news also prevents a stronger bearish call.

Macro and narrative both lean negative. Restrictive rates, weak sentiment, and oil/inflation shock are poor conditions for a rate-sensitive theme. Quant confirmation is weak with average 6m momentum of -8.22%, 3m momentum of -3.28%, and negative average relative strength. With conviction already at 1, there is no reason to increase exposure.

This is the clearest positive narrative development in the book. A true narrative shift is present: AI power demand is now being framed in explicit terawatt-scale industrial terms, moving grid capacity from secondary beneficiary to gating asset. That shift is reinforced by strong winners inside the basket—GEV and NEE have excellent momentum/relative strength and strong Sharpe—so the theme has credible infrastructure leadership despite the tape.

Macro is still mildly negative, and the quant picture is messy beneath the headline. Theme-average 3m momentum is -10.51%, relative strength is -6.55%, volatility is high at 61.14%, and SMR remains in a severe drawdown breach at -21.41% portfolio drawdown. This was a prior veto reason, and the risk sleeve has worsened, so any bullishness must be narrowly about proven grid/infrastructure names, not speculative nuclear beta.

Defense is the best combination of resilience and confirmation in this dataset. Macro is only mildly negative, narrative is modestly positive through defense AI/cyber modernization, and quant is excellent: 6m momentum 26.33%, 3m momentum 22.4%, relative strength +10.1, and broadly strong Sharpe across incumbents. In a BEAR regime, this is one of the few themes acting like a true leadership pocket.

There is no fresh narrative shift, only steady support. Prior session attempts to increase were vetoed, and PLTR still carries elevated volatility and an -8.02% portfolio drawdown, keeping the theme close to risk limits. If geopolitical headlines fade without funded procurement follow-through, some of the recent strength could cool.

There is at least a faint constructive thread via IBM's credible incumbent-led stack and AI/quantum adjacency, which is better than pure promotional speculation. Theme conviction is already minimal, so maintaining optionality at 1 is defensible if one wants exposure to a future breakthrough.

Everything that matters for a conviction increase is wrong. Macro is negative, no meaningful narrative shift exists, 3m momentum is deeply negative (-25.11%), relative strength is awful (-23.36%), volatility is extreme (66.88), concentration is too high (HHI 0.3061), and portfolio drawdowns in IONQ/RGTI remain severe. Prior sessions explicitly vetoed increases and conditions have not improved.

Policy support from CMS payment boosts gives the theme a real, if modest, positive narrative underpinning. Healthcare also retains some defensive qualities in a BEAR tape, and a few names like ABBV and LLY provide quality ballast.

The quant tape does not confirm the narrative. Average 3m momentum is -7.61%, relative strength is very weak at -13.69%, and the group is fragmented with notable weakness in NVO and ISRG. Prior +1 was vetoed, and there is no new narrative shift strong enough to overcome weak relative performance.

At the margin, continued BTC accumulation and some resilience in non-miner/adjacent exposure like XYZ show the space is not uniformly collapsing. Conviction is already at the floor, so downside in portfolio stance is limited.

This is the cleanest negative setup. Macro is the worst of the book for crypto, and there is a genuine negative narrative shift: crypto is behaving as a leveraged macro-risk asset rather than a resilient institutionalized one. Quant is decisively poor—6m momentum -38.27%, 3m -21.3%, relative strength -15.7%, volatility 70.76, HHI 0.3061, and deep drawdowns in COIN/MSTR. Prior sessions repeatedly cut and vetoed any increase; nothing has improved.

This is the most straightforward pro-risk-adjusted increase. Macro is the only positive theme impact in the set, narrative remains supportive via gold and hedge demand, and quant is strong across the board: 6m momentum 17.4%, 3m 11.19%, relative strength +11.83, low volatility 17.94, and shallow drawdowns. In a persistent BEAR regime, this is exactly where conviction should be concentrated.

The main risk is crowding and diminishing incremental upside from an already high conviction of 9. Gold is steady rather than surging, and if ceasefire/easing expectations improve quickly, defensives could lag a rebound in cyclicals and growth.

Bullish-leaning analyst bias applied selectively: sought reasons to add where narrative and quant aligned, but respected repeated veto history and BEAR-regime risk constraints.

Summary: I am leaning into the few themes that still have durable leadership in a hostile tape rather than forcing broad bullishness. The strongest add is Defensive, where macro, narrative, and quant all align. Defense & Aerospace also merits a measured increase because it is showing real relative strength and quality momentum in a BEAR regime. Energy & Grid Infrastructure earns a cautious +1 on narrative-shift grounds—the terawatt AI power story is becoming more concrete—but this is despite, not because of, the current risk profile, so implementation should favor proven grid/utilities over speculative nuclear names. I am explicitly not repeating prior vetoed +1 calls in AI Compute and Biotech without better risk improvement. Crypto remains the clearest negative theme, but with conviction already at the floor, the practical recommendation is to keep it pinned there.

Macro headwind remains negative in a firm BEAR regime (impact_score -0.15) with elevated VIX at 24.17.

Theme 3m momentum is negative at -3.43% and average relative strength vs SPY is -2.92%, indicating weakening tape under risk-off conditions.

Theme average volatility is 43.58%, with several names carrying VaR above the 3% threshold: NVDA -3.54%, AMD -5.07%, AVGO -3.84%, TSM -3.22%, SMCI -6.53%, ASML -3.73%.

Realized drawdown stress is building in select names: SMCI -8.21%, ASML -8.03%, META -6.33% from entry.

This theme faces one of the strongest macro headwinds in the book (impact_score -0.55) from restrictive rates and weak consumer sentiment.

Theme momentum is weak: 6m average -8.22% and 3m average -3.28%.

Daily VaR exceeds 3% in DHI -3.42%, LEN -4.02%, and RKT -5.12%, showing elevated downside risk.

LEN portfolio drawdown is -9.17%, only 0.83 percentage points from the theme max-drawdown limit of 10%.

Several constituents have poor risk-adjusted performance, including LEN Sharpe -0.577 and AMT Sharpe about -0.93.

Active drawdown breach: SMR portfolio drawdown is -21.41%, far through the theme max-drawdown limit of 12%.

CEG portfolio drawdown is -11.60%, only 0.40 percentage points from the same 12% limit.

Theme average volatility is 61.14%, among the highest in the portfolio.

Multiple constituents have extreme daily VaR above threshold: CEG -4.55%, FSLR -5.34%, SMR -9.59%, UEC -7.05%, GEV -4.29%.

Theme 3m momentum is -10.51% and average relative strength vs SPY is -6.55%, a poor setup under BEAR conditions.

Macro backdrop is still negative (impact_score -0.25), so the structural story is not offsetting current tape damage.

This is one of the strongest relative sleeves, but not risk-free in a BEAR regime.

PLTR remains the weak point: daily VaR -5.57% and portfolio drawdown -8.02%, only 1.98 percentage points from the theme max-drawdown limit of 10%.

Theme concentration is not excessive (HHI 0.1834), but conviction is already high at 5, so adding here would increase single-theme dependence despite otherwise solid momentum.

Macro impact is only mildly negative (-0.05), which supports holding rather than adding aggressively.

Theme concentration is too high: HHI 0.3061 exceeds the 0.25 concentration threshold.

Theme average volatility is 66.88%, with extreme single-name volatility in IONQ 95.46% and RGTI 109.07%.

Daily VaR is far above the 3% threshold in IONQ -7.99%, RGTI -8.78%, and IBM -3.03%.

Realized drawdowns remain severe: IONQ -15.14% and RGTI -14.17% from entry.

Theme 3m momentum is -25.11% and average relative strength vs SPY is -23.36%, confirming persistent underperformance in the current BEAR regime.

Macro headwind is materially negative (impact_score -0.35) and aligns with weak momentum, creating a double flag.

Theme average relative strength vs SPY is -13.69% and 3m momentum is -7.61%, showing persistent lagging behavior.

Theme average volatility is 43.73%, elevated for a sleeve with only moderate risk tolerance.

Daily VaR exceeds 3% in LLY -3.52%, NVO -4.37%, and CRSP -5.87%.

Risk-adjusted performance is weak in key names: NVO Sharpe -0.844 and ISRG Sharpe -0.088.

Macro impact is mildly negative (-0.10), and the sleeve is not acting defensively enough to justify increased exposure.

Theme average volatility is 70.76%, with all constituents carrying extreme daily VaR: COIN -6.48%, MSTR -7.31%, MARA -7.71%, XYZ -5.16%.

Realized drawdowns remain severe: COIN -14.73% and MSTR -12.31% from entry.

Theme momentum is very weak: 6m average -38.27% and 3m average -21.30%.

Average relative strength vs SPY is -15.70%, confirming broad underperformance.

Macro headwind is the worst in the portfolio (impact_score -0.60) and directly hostile to liquidity-sensitive assets in a BEAR regime.

This is the only sleeve with a positive macro tailwind (impact_score 0.20) in the current BEAR regime.

Theme average volatility is low at 17.94%, and all daily VaR readings remain below the 3% threshold.

Momentum and relative strength are both positive: 3m average 11.19% and average relative strength vs SPY 11.83%.

No portfolio drawdown stress is evident; all names remain well inside the theme max-drawdown limit of 5%.

Energy_grid breach: SMR portfolio drawdown is -21.41%, exceeding the theme max-drawdown limit of 12%.

Energy_grid warning: CEG portfolio drawdown is -11.60%, only 0.40 percentage points from the 12% limit.

Real_estate warning: LEN portfolio drawdown is -9.17%, only 0.83 percentage points from the 10% limit.

Defense_aerospace warning: PLTR portfolio drawdown is -8.02%, only 1.98 percentage points from the 10% limit.

Quantum stress: IONQ portfolio drawdown is -15.14% and RGTI is -14.17%.

Crypto stress: COIN portfolio drawdown is -14.73% and MSTR is -12.31%.

Summary: Risk remains decisively elevated at the portfolio level. The BEAR regime is highly persistent and high-confidence, and the conditions that triggered prior session vetoes have not improved enough to lift them. The main portfolio threats are concentrated in speculative sleeves: quantum and crypto_digital both exceed the HHI concentration threshold, carry extreme volatility and VaR, and remain in deep realized drawdowns. Energy_grid is the most urgent operational issue because SMR is in active breach of the theme drawdown cap and CEG is close behind. Real_estate is also vulnerable under restrictive-rate macro conditions, with LEN nearing its drawdown limit. Defense_aerospace and Defensive are the relative stabilizers, but that is not sufficient to offset portfolio-level stress. Maintain the veto on all conviction increases; prioritize reductions in energy_grid, quantum, crypto_digital, and rate-sensitive real_estate, while preserving at least a 3 conviction floor in Defensive.

Summary: VETOED: Portfolio-level risk remains in veto territory. The market regime is firmly BEAR with 99.7% confidence, 18-day persistence, and a 0.98 BEAR->BEAR continuation probability. Prior veto conditions have not been resolved: quantum and crypto_digital still breach concentration limits (HHI 0.3061 > 0.25), multiple themes carry daily VaR above the 3% threshold, and realized drawdown stress remains acute in speculative sleeves. Energy_grid still has an active drawdown breach with SMR at -21.41% versus the theme max-drawdown limit of 12%. Quantum remains deeply stressed with IONQ at -15.14% and RGTI at -14.17% portfolio drawdowns, while crypto_digital remains acutely stressed with COIN at -14.73% and MSTR at -12.31%. No conviction increases should be approved this session.. Only conviction decreases applied.

Summary: 16 orders, 6 sells, 10 buys, turnover 4.43%, regime sizing 50%


HMM market regime is firmly BEAR (99.6% confidence; 18-day persistence; BEAR->BEAR continuation 0.98). Macro risk is consistent with risk-off conditions: VIX is elevated at 24.17 (not extreme), growth is still positive but slowing risk is present, and policy remains restrictive (Fed funds 3.64%).

Restrictive/neutral-to-tight: Fed funds at 3.64% with CPI still above target (CPI YoY 2.66%), implying limited urgency to cut aggressively. Elevated VIX suggests markets are not pricing a rapid easing cycle.

Cooling but not fully resolved: CPI YoY at 2.66% indicates disinflation versus prior peaks (exact prior not provided), but remains high enough to keep real rates restrictive. This is mildly headwind for rate-sensitive and long-duration risk assets.

Still expanding but with recession risk signals: GDP YoY is strong at 5.42%, unemployment is rising (4.3% vs 4.2% prior year), and jobless claims increased to 202k from 214k prior month (directionally mixed but labor is not clearly improving). Importantly, the yield curve is not inverted now (T10Y-2Y spread +0.5%), which reduces recession probability versus a fully inverted curve, but the BEAR regime and VIX keep downside risk elevated.

Explanation: Despite a constructive long-run narrative (compute industrial base), the BEAR regime and elevated VIX (24.17) are headwinds for high-multiple growth/tech beta. Restrictive rates (3.64%) further pressure long-duration equity valuations.

Explanation: Rate sensitivity is direct: Fed funds at 3.64% is a headwind for housing/REIT duration. Housing starts are improving (HOUST +9.5% YoY), but the overall risk-off regime (BEAR, VIX 24.17) likely overwhelms near-term demand tailwinds.

Explanation: Fundamentals are supported by AI power demand, but macro risk-off and restrictive financial conditions reduce appetite for capital-intensive infrastructure equities. Elevated VIX (24.17) typically widens risk premia, pressuring grid/utility growth exposures.

Explanation: Defense is relatively macro-insensitive, and GDP remains positive (5.42%), which limits downside. However, BEAR regime risk and higher uncertainty (VIX 24.17) can still compress multiples and delay investor conviction.

Explanation: Quantum is high-risk/high-duration and tends to underperform in BEAR regimes with elevated volatility. Restrictive rates (3.64%) plus risk-off conditions (VIX 24.17) are strong headwinds.

Explanation: Some defensiveness from healthcare demand helps, but biotech still behaves like growth/optionality under risk-off. With BEAR regime and elevated VIX, financing and equity risk premia are likely to tighten.

Explanation: Crypto is highly sensitive to liquidity and risk appetite; BEAR regime plus VIX at 24.17 is a clear headwind. Restrictive policy (3.64%) further reduces speculative bid and increases drawdown risk.

Explanation: Defensive/hedge themes benefit in BEAR regimes as investors rotate toward stability. Elevated VIX (24.17) supports demand for hedges, though restrictive rates can limit upside for some defensives depending on duration.

Risk-off volatility remains elevated: VIX at 24.17 signals persistent uncertainty that typically pressures growth, speculative, and high-multiple themes (quantum, crypto_digital, ai_compute).

Policy remains restrictive: Fed funds at 3.64% with CPI still 2.66% YoY implies limited near-term easing, sustaining higher discount rates and valuation compression risk.

Labor market is not clearly improving: unemployment at 4.3% (up vs 4.2% prior year) and jobless claims at 202k (from 214k prior month) suggest fragile employment momentum, which can worsen consumer and cyclical demand.

Summary: Macro conditions are consistent with a BEAR regime: restrictive policy (3.64% Fed funds), elevated volatility (VIX 24.17), and only partially resolved inflation (CPI 2.66% YoY). Net effect is broadly negative for high-duration and speculative themes (quantum, crypto_digital, real_estate), mildly supportive for defensive/hedge, and mixed for AI compute and energy grid due to strong narratives but weak risk appetite.

Oil Surges To $115, Stocks Slide As Trump Deadline Looms: What's Moving Markets Tuesday?

Broadcom TPU Deals Extend 'Multi-Year AI Supply Visibility': Analyst

Intel Stock Surges 2% As Elon Musk Partnership Targets 1 Terawatt Of AI Power

Intel in talks with Google, Amazon amid advanced packaging push, Wired says

Hyperscalers Shift To Arm Chips What It Means For AMD Valuation

The Big Risk With Taiwan Semiconductor Stock That No One Wants to Talk About

First Solar Price Target Cut by Jefferies as Logistics Inflation Threatens Near-Term Margins

First Solar (FSLR) Is Up 5.1% After Announcing New 3.7GW U.S. Finishing Plant Expansion

Defense Stocks Can’t Get a Boost From Iran War Escalations. What Would Move Them.

General Dynamics Wins a $1.27B Deal to Aid Virginia Class Submarines

The U.S. Needs Missiles. This Stock Is a Buy, Melius Says.

UnitedHealth, Humana, CVS Jump As CMS Boosts Medicare Payments

Novo Nordisk Unveils $399 Wegovy HD, Undercutting Lilly By About 40%

Eli Lilly Extends AC Immune Tau Pact To Broaden Alzheimer’s Pipeline Potential

Pharma, Biotech Giants Ramp Up M&A in Q1 to Boost Pipelines

Toll Brothers Stock Could Lead Homebuilder Rebound as Housing Stabilizes

D R Horton Faces Plumbing Claims As Investors Weigh Valuation And Risks

Block's Cash App Unveils Pay-Over-Time for P2P Money Transfers

Jack Dorsey Signals Return of Bitcoin Faucets

Gold Steadies With Dollar Little Changed as Inflation Worries Persist Amid War In Iran

UBS Maintains Buy on Coca-Cola, Raises Price Target to $90

UBS Maintains Buy on Procter & Gamble, Lowers Price Target to $166

Broadcom TPU deals with Google/Anthropic improve multi-year AI supply visibility (Benzinga, Yahoo Finance, Proactive).

Intel packaging push with Google/Amazon and Terafab participation reinforces foundry/packaging as strategic AI bottleneck (TipRanks, GuruFocus, 24/7 Wall St., Benzinga).

Geopolitical Taiwan risk remains a latent overhang on the AI hardware stack (Motley Fool).

Barron's points to housing stabilization and a possible homebuilder rebound led by Toll Brothers.

D.R. Horton plumbing litigation headlines add idiosyncratic legal/reputation risk.

No meaningful rates relief narrative emerged; housing remains stabilization, not reacceleration.

Intel/Terafab's 1-terawatt framing keeps AI power demand central to the investment story (Benzinga).

First Solar domestic finishing expansion supports U.S. energy-security and domestic-supply narratives (Simply Wall St.).

Offset by logistics inflation and margin pressure concerns for First Solar (24/7 Wall St.) and oil-spike macro volatility (Benzinga).

Barron's notes defense stocks are not getting the expected boost from Iran escalation.

Missile replenishment and submarine contract flow remain supportive for primes (Barron's, Zacks).

Space/launch industrial activity remains healthy via Boeing/ViaSat and Rocket Lab headlines.

This is a continuation and strengthening of the earlier shift: geopolitical conflict alone is no longer sufficient for defense equity upside. The market increasingly demands funded procurement, replenishment orders, and program visibility rather than reacting mechanically to war headlines.

No material quantum-specific breakthrough or policy catalyst in the provided newsflow.

Most adjacent tech headlines were about AI capex, Arm/custom silicon, and Mag 7 weakness rather than quantum commercialization.

CMS Medicare payment boost is a meaningful policy tailwind for managed care and broader health sentiment (Benzinga).

Lilly expands beyond obesity into neurodegeneration via AC Immune collaboration (Simply Wall St.).

Novo's lower-priced Wegovy HD intensifies GLP-1 competition and pricing pressure (GuruFocus).

The obesity story is evolving from pure demand-explosion enthusiasm toward a two-track narrative: GLP-1 remains structurally powerful, but pricing/access competition is becoming a central battleground. That matters because future winners may be defined less by category growth alone and more by breadth of pipeline, reimbursement leverage, and lifecycle management.

Block product expansion shows continued fintech utility innovation via installment P2P and enterprise commerce wins.

Risk-off macro and oil/geopolitical shock remain the dominant narrative for crypto-linked equities.

No strong institutional-crypto adoption catalyst offset the macro pressure in this session.

Gold remains firm amid Iran conflict and inflation worries (MT Newswires).

Staples retain relative support via UBS actions on KO and PG.

Medicare payment boost also supports defensive healthcare complex sentiment (Benzinga).

AI compute and energy_grid remain tightly linked: the story is not just chip demand, but power-intensive industrial buildout measured in terawatt terms.

Defense_aerospace and defensive are diverging under the same geopolitical shock: gold/staples are behaving more like immediate hedges than defense equities, which now need procurement proof.

Biotech_health is showing internal bifurcation similar to prior crypto narratives: category adoption is strong, but value capture is shifting toward pricing power, reimbursement, and pipeline breadth rather than simple exposure.

Macro/geopolitical stress is pressuring speculative-duration themes (crypto_digital, quantum-adjacent tech) while favoring cash-flow and hedge-oriented exposures.

Summary: Narrative tone stays mildly bearish as Iran/oil macro stress dominates tape action, but the more important under-the-surface story is selective differentiation. AI infrastructure narrative remains intact and continues to deepen around packaging plus power, though this is now continuity rather than a fresh shift. The two genuine story changes worth flagging are: first, defense equities are further decoupling from raw war headlines and now require visible procurement/funding to work; second, GLP-1/biotech leadership is maturing from a simple growth narrative into a pricing-and-access competition narrative. Defensive assets are benefiting more immediately from geopolitical fear than defense stocks, while crypto-linked equities remain vulnerable to broad liquidity/risk-off conditions.

AI infrastructure narrative remains fundamentally constructive: Broadcom TPU deal visibility, Intel packaging/foundry traction, and the broader 'compute industrial base' framing all support durable capex demand. Quant is not broken outright either: 6m theme momentum is positive at 10.15%, with strong leaders like TSM and ASML showing solid relative strength and Sharpe. If the market stabilizes, this theme has credible leadership candidates.

Macro is still a headwind in a firm BEAR regime, and the theme's 3m momentum has rolled over to -3.43% with average relative strength vs SPY at -2.55. Internally, breadth is mixed to weak across mega-cap software/internet and hardware beta, while volatility remains elevated at 43.58. Prior attempts to raise conviction were vetoed, and conditions have not improved enough to justify repeating the same +1 call.

There are early signs of stabilization: housing starts are improving, Barron's is discussing a homebuilder rebound, and select REIT/property names like O and SPG show positive 3m momentum and strong relative strength. At a low starting conviction, the theme is no longer universally collapsing.

This remains one of the clearest macro headwinds: impact score is -0.55, rates are still restrictive, and the BEAR regime suppresses cyclical/rate-sensitive exposure. Theme-average momentum is negative on both 6m and 3m, relative strength is still below SPY, and LEN/RKT remain weak. With conviction already at 1, there is no reason to add.

The long-duration story is attractive: AI power demand keeps strengthening, the terawatt framing is strategically important, and domestic buildout catalysts like First Solar expansion support the infrastructure thesis. Quant also shows real pockets of strength in NEE and especially GEV, suggesting the theme is not uniformly impaired.

This is exactly the kind of theme where the story is better than the tape. Macro impact is negative, 3m momentum is poor at -10.51, average relative strength is -6.38, and volatility is very high at 61.12. Most importantly, prior +1 proposals were vetoed and the key risk breach remains unresolved: SMR portfolio drawdown is still extreme at -21.58%, worse than the 12% limit context. Until that stress clears, no increase is warranted.

This remains one of the strongest quantitative themes in the book: 6m momentum of 26.33%, 3m momentum of 22.4%, positive average relative strength of 9.81, and generally strong Sharpe with manageable volatility. Fundamental support is still present through missile replenishment, submarine awards, and procurement visibility. In a BEAR regime, this is one of the better quality cyclical-defensive hybrids.

The key narrative shift is a real caution flag: war headlines alone are no longer enough to lift defense equities, and the market now demands funded procurement proof. Macro is only mildly negative, but prior +1 attempts were vetoed, and while PLTR drawdown has improved from prior warning levels, the broader portfolio is still under a no-increase risk posture. Strong theme, but not enough change to press for an upgrade now.

If risk appetite returns, quantum retains asymmetric upside and some 6m support from adjacent large-cap enablers like GOOG. At a thematic level, the optionality remains structurally interesting over a long horizon.

This is the weakest combination of macro and quant in the set: macro impact is -0.7, there is no positive narrative catalyst, 3m momentum is -25.11, relative strength is -23.22, volatility is 66.86, HHI is elevated at 0.3061, and portfolio drawdowns in IONQ/RGTI remain severe. Prior sessions repeatedly flagged this sleeve, and nothing has improved enough to justify patience beyond maintaining minimum conviction. Directionally this deserves a cut, but conviction is already floored at 1.

Narrative is better than price: CMS payment support, pipeline expansion, and M&A activity all provide a constructive backdrop. The narrative shift toward pricing power, reimbursement leverage, and pipeline breadth could ultimately favor higher-quality incumbents and diversified winners. Macro headwind is only mild at -0.2.

Quant does not confirm yet. Theme-average 3m momentum is -7.61 and relative strength is deeply negative at -14.0, with NVO weakness dragging the sleeve and volatility still elevated. Prior +1 was vetoed, and while the narrative is maturing constructively, this still looks like a stock-picker's theme rather than a broad sleeve increase.

There are still pockets of utility innovation through fintech rails and product expansion, and if liquidity conditions improve this theme can rebound violently from depressed levels. Low starting conviction already reflects much of the skepticism.

Everything important is still wrong for this sleeve: macro impact is -0.75, narrative score is negative, no institutional adoption catalyst offset appears, 6m momentum is -38.27, 3m is -21.3, relative strength is -15.62, volatility is 70.74, HHI is 0.3061, and VaR/drawdowns remain extreme. Prior sessions repeatedly cut or tried to cut this theme and risk vetoes centered on exactly these unresolved issues. This remains a clear negative-delta call, though the floor keeps conviction at 1.

This is the cleanest alignment in the book: positive macro impact in a BEAR regime, supportive geopolitical/inflation narrative, strong 6m and 3m momentum, positive relative strength of 11.54, low volatility at 17.94, and shallow portfolio drawdowns. Gold, staples, and defensive healthcare are doing what they should in this tape.

The only real caution is positioning and prior process: conviction is already very high at 9, and a prior +1 was vetoed under the broader no-increase regime. Some components like TLT and PG are not contributing much, so the sleeve is not perfect. Still, there is no reason to reduce; the question is only whether to max it, and current conditions do not justify re-litigating that now.

Bullish-leaning analyst, but prior risk vetoes remain binding; this session favors preserving quality exposures and avoiding renewed increase proposals where risk conditions have not materially improved.

Summary: Despite my bullish structural bias, this session does not support fresh conviction increases. The macro regime remains firmly BEAR, and prior council vetoes explicitly warned against repeating +1 proposals without improved drawdown/risk conditions. The best underlying themes are defensive and defense_aerospace, with ai_compute still fundamentally attractive but lacking tape confirmation. Energy_grid has a strong long-term story but remains blocked by unresolved drawdown stress. The clearest negative calls remain quantum and crypto_digital, though both are already pinned at minimum conviction.

Macro headwind remains negative in a firm BEAR regime; theme impact score is -0.25.

Theme 3m momentum is negative at -3.43% and relative strength vs SPY is -2.55%, showing weakening tape despite mixed 6m gains.

Theme average volatility is 43.58%, and several constituents exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold: NVDA -3.54%, AMD -5.07%, AVGO -3.84%, TSM -3.22%, SMCI -6.53%, ASML -3.73%.

Single-name stress is visible in SMCI with -6.61% portfolio drawdown and a -66.18% historical max drawdown; ASML is also down -7.21% from entry.

This is one of the strongest macro headwinds in the book; theme impact score is -0.55 due to restrictive rates and risk-off conditions.

Theme momentum is weak: 6m average -8.22%, 3m average -3.28%, and relative strength vs SPY is -2.31%.

Daily VaR exceeds 3% in DHI -3.42%, LEN -3.89%, and RKT -5.12%, indicating elevated downside potential.

LEN portfolio drawdown is -8.95%, only 1.05 percentage points from the theme max-drawdown limit of 10%.

Theme is in active drawdown breach: SMR portfolio drawdown is -21.58%, exceeding the theme max-drawdown limit of 12% by 9.58 percentage points.

CEG portfolio drawdown is -11.00%, only 1.00 percentage point from the same 12% theme limit.

Theme average volatility is 61.12%, among the highest in the portfolio, with extreme daily VaR in CEG -4.55%, FSLR -5.34%, SMR -9.70%, UEC -7.05%, and GEV -4.29%.

Momentum has deteriorated sharply: theme 3m average is -10.51% and relative strength vs SPY is -6.38%.

Macro backdrop is a double flag: negative theme impact score (-0.35) plus weak momentum in a persistent BEAR regime.

This is one of the stronger sleeves, with 6m momentum 26.33%, 3m momentum 22.40%, and relative strength vs SPY 9.81%.

However, PLTR injects avoidable risk: daily VaR is -5.57% and portfolio drawdown is -7.11%, leaving it 2.89 percentage points from the theme max-drawdown limit of 10%.

Theme concentration is not excessive at HHI 0.1834, but conviction is already high at 5, so incremental adds would increase single-theme dependence in a BEAR regime.

Theme breaches concentration threshold: HHI is 0.3061, above the 0.25 concentration flag.

Macro headwind is severe with impact score -0.70 in a persistent BEAR regime.

Theme 3m momentum is -25.11% and relative strength vs SPY is -23.22%, confirming severe underperformance.

Theme average volatility is 66.86%, with extreme daily VaR in IONQ -7.99%, RGTI -8.78%, and IBM -3.03%.

Realized losses remain deep from entry: IONQ portfolio drawdown is -14.45% and RGTI is -13.10%.

Prior-session veto condition remains unresolved; drawdowns are still materially stressed even if slightly improved from the worst prints.

Theme 3m momentum is -7.61% and relative strength vs SPY is -14.00%, indicating persistent lagging behavior.

Theme average volatility is 43.72%, and daily VaR exceeds 3% in LLY -3.52%, NVO -4.37%, and CRSP -5.87%.

Internal quality is mixed: NVO Sharpe is -0.839 and ISRG Sharpe is -0.091.

Portfolio drawdowns are not yet at the 12% theme limit, but ISRG -5.98% and ABBV -5.67% show accumulating pressure.

Macro headwind is the worst in the portfolio with impact score -0.75 under restrictive policy and elevated VIX.

Momentum is decisively negative: 6m average -38.27%, 3m average -21.30%, and relative strength vs SPY -15.62%.

Theme average volatility is 70.74%, with extreme daily VaR in COIN -6.48%, MSTR -7.31%, MARA -7.71%, and XYZ -5.16%.

Realized drawdown stress remains acute from entry: COIN -13.71% and MSTR -11.72%.

Prior-session veto condition remains unresolved; this sleeve is still structurally incompatible with a high-confidence BEAR regime.

This is the only sleeve with supportive macro tailwind; theme impact score is +0.15 in the current BEAR regime.

Momentum and relative strength are favorable: 6m average 17.40%, 3m average 11.19%, and relative strength vs SPY 11.54%.

Theme average volatility is low at 17.94%, and all daily VaR readings remain below the 3% threshold.

Portfolio drawdowns are shallow across the sleeve, all well inside the 5% theme max-drawdown limit.

Energy_grid breach: SMR portfolio drawdown is -21.58%, exceeding the theme max-drawdown limit of 12%.

Energy_grid warning: CEG portfolio drawdown is -11.00%, only 1.00 percentage point from the 12% theme limit.

Real_estate warning: LEN portfolio drawdown is -8.95%, only 1.05 percentage points from the 10% theme limit.

Quantum stress: IONQ portfolio drawdown is -14.45% and RGTI is -13.10% from entry.

Crypto stress: COIN portfolio drawdown is -13.71% and MSTR is -11.72% from entry.

Defense_aerospace warning: PLTR portfolio drawdown is -7.11%, with elevated single-name VaR of -5.57%.

Summary: Risk remains decisively elevated at the portfolio level, and the prior veto should stay in force. The main issue is not cross-theme correlation—those are benign—but a combination of persistent BEAR regime risk, unresolved concentration in quantum and crypto_digital, repeated VaR breaches across speculative sleeves, and an active realized drawdown breach in energy_grid via SMR. Defense_aerospace and defensive are the only relatively stable areas, but that is not enough to justify adding risk elsewhere. Recommended posture: block all conviction increases, maintain at least a 3 conviction floor in defensive, reduce or exit the most stressed speculative sleeves, and prioritize drawdown containment over thematic expansion.

Summary: VETOED: Portfolio-level risk remains in veto territory. The market regime is firmly BEAR with 99.6% confidence, 18-day persistence, and a 0.98 BEAR->BEAR continuation probability. Prior veto conditions have not improved enough to lift the block: quantum and crypto_digital still breach concentration limits (HHI 0.3061 > 0.25), multiple themes still carry daily VaR above the 3% threshold, and realized drawdown stress remains active in speculative and cyclical sleeves. Energy_grid still has a live drawdown breach with SMR at -21.58% versus the theme max-drawdown limit of 12%, while quantum remains deeply stressed (IONQ -14.45%, RGTI -13.10%) and crypto_digital remains acutely stressed (COIN -13.71%, MSTR -11.72%) from our entry points. No conviction increases should be approved this session.. Only conviction decreases applied.

Summary: 23 orders, 8 risk exits, 6 sells, 9 buys, turnover 6.61%, regime sizing 50%


HMM market regime is firmly BEAR (99.4% confidence, 18-day persistence; BEAR->BEAR prob 0.98). Macro signals are consistent with risk-off: policy remains restrictive (Fed funds 3.64%), consumer sentiment is below prior-year levels (UMCSENT 56.6 vs 64.7), and jobless claims are elevated (ICSA 202k vs 214k prior month—still high absolute level).

Restrictive/holding: Fed funds at 3.64% alongside CPI still positive (CPI YoY 2.66%) suggests policy is not yet meaningfully easing.

Cooling but not dead: CPI YoY 2.66% is moderate (not re-accelerating sharply in the provided snapshot), which reduces worst-case inflation risk, but still keeps real-rate pressure relevant for rate-sensitive assets.

Mixed-to-slowing risk: GDP YoY is strong at 5.42% (supports some resilience), but the combination of BEAR regime and elevated labor-market pulse (ICSA 202k) plus weaker consumer sentiment implies growth may be losing momentum at the margin.

Explanation: BEAR regime and risk-off conditions typically compress long-duration growth multiples, but the macro backdrop is not outright recessionary (yield curve not inverted: T10Y2Y spread +0.52%). Moderate inflation (CPI 2.66%) and resilient GDP (5.42%) provide partial support.

Explanation: Rate sensitivity is high: Fed funds at 3.64% is a headwind, and consumer sentiment is weaker (56.6 vs 64.7). Housing starts are improving (HOUST +9.5% YoY), which offsets some damage, but the BEAR regime keeps financing/demand risk elevated.

Explanation: Grid/energy is a structural beneficiary of AI power demand, but BEAR conditions still pressure capital markets and risk appetite. Inflation is only moderate (CPI 2.66%), and GDP is strong (5.42%), which helps long-cycle infrastructure demand, yet the overall regime remains a drag.

Explanation: Defense is relatively macro-insensitive, but a BEAR regime can still reduce equity risk appetite. With no recession signal from the yield curve (T10Y2Y +0.52%) and strong GDP (5.42%), the macro headwind is limited.

Explanation: Quantum is high-beta/high-duration and tends to underperform in BEAR regimes due to discount-rate and liquidity effects. Even though the yield curve is not inverted, risk-off conditions dominate for speculative tech.

Explanation: Biotech has some defensive characteristics versus pure cyclicals, and the macro data does not show a sharp recession trigger (T10Y2Y +0.52%). However, BEAR regime still creates valuation pressure, so the net effect is slightly negative.

Explanation: Crypto is highly sensitive to liquidity and risk appetite; a BEAR regime is a strong headwind. With no explicit VIX provided, we infer risk-off from the regime and weaker consumer sentiment (UMCSENT 56.6), which typically translates into lower crypto risk-taking.

Explanation: Defensive/hedge themes benefit in BEAR regimes as investors rotate toward stability. Moderate inflation (CPI 2.66%) and a non-inverted curve (T10Y2Y +0.52%) reduce tail-risk versus a recessionary setup, supporting a mild positive tilt.

Recession/tail-risk not confirmed by the curve, but labor-market stress is rising: jobless claims at 202k (ICSA) remain elevated versus 214k prior month, consistent with weakening demand for labor under a BEAR regime.

Valuation compression risk for long-duration/speculative themes: BEAR regime (99.4% confidence, 18-day persistence) implies sustained risk-off, which is typically most damaging for quantum/AI/crypto multiples.

Consumer demand risk: UMCSENT is below last year (56.6 vs 64.7), which can spill into rate-sensitive sectors like real estate despite improving housing starts (+9.5% YoY).

Summary: Macro is consistent with a restrictive-policy, risk-off environment: Fed funds at 3.64% and a BEAR regime (99.4% confidence) point to continued valuation pressure, especially for long-duration and speculative themes (quantum, crypto). Real estate is the most rate-sensitive casualty (net negative despite +9.5% YoY housing starts), while defensive/hedge themes show a modest relative tailwind. AI/energy-grid are structurally supported by growth narratives, but the current BEAR regime limits upside.

ASML shares fall on US Congress plan to further restrict China exports

ASML Stock Sinks 4%. This Could Cause a Double-Digit Hit to 2026 Revenue.

ASML Holding (ASML) Secures $8 Billion EUV Equipment Order

Axios Reported ARPA-E To Commit $135M Over 18 Months To Accelerate Fusion Energy Technologies

Shares of oil and gas companies are trading lower after President Trump posted on social media that the U.S. will work closely with Iran... signaling a de-escalation in the Middle East conflict

$140 Mirage Masks Deeper Oil Supply Failure

Lennar Has a Strong Foundation. The Stock Can Build on It.

SpaceX Valuation Push Tests Limits of Growth Premium

Boeing Delivers ViaSat-3 Satellite Ahead Of SpaceX Launch

Palantir Faces UK Boycott As Maven And NHS Deals Reshape Outlook

IonQ, D-Wave, Rigetti stocks tumble as Mizuho slashes price targets by 25%

IonQ Strengthens Position With Strategic Government Contracts

Rigetti Delivers Novera QPU to USask for Quantum System Build

The $190 Billion ‘Diabesity’ Market Is Set to Explode. Lilly and Novo Face These Stock Catalysts.

Novo Nordisk Unveils $399 Wegovy HD, Undercutting Lilly By About 40%

How to Play Lilly Stock Post Oral Obesity Pill Foundayo's Approval

Hims & Hers Health (HIMS) Is Up 8.3% After Expanding Novo Nordisk GLP-1 Partnership

Apple Pulls Down Jack Dorsey's Bitchat Messaging Service From China's App Store For Containing 'Illegal' Content

Block's Cash App Unveils Pay-Over-Time for P2P Money Transfers

Does Block (SQ) Using Square to Power GOLFTEC Hint at a Deeper Upmarket Strategy Shift?

Daily ETF Flows: GLD Scoops Up $511M

Gold Steadies With Dollar Little Changed as Inflation Worries Persist Amid War In Iran

Markets Party On Trump's Ceasefire — But For How Long?

Magnificent Seven Are Cracking – Goldman Sees A Tech Value Opportunity That Hasn't Existed Since the 1970s

The App Killer: How 'Agentic AI' Is Turning Your Smartphone Into A Digital Employee

Elon Musk Gives Intel The AI Foundry Stamp It's Been Chasing

Anthropic Teams With Apple, Microsoft And Nvidia To Test Latest Cybersecurity Tech

Reuters/Barron's coverage of MATCH Act risk to ASML China sales and servicing

Benzinga: Magnificent Seven cracking / tech value rotation framing

Benzinga: Intel gains AI foundry validation; Anthropic/Apple/Microsoft/Nvidia cybersecurity collaboration

Insider Monkey: SK Hynix $8B EUV order supports long-duration demand

This materially evolves yesterday's bullish 'AI as industrial utility stack' thesis. Demand remains real, but the bottleneck story is now colliding with policy fragility in the equipment layer: the market narrative is shifting from 'AI buildout is unstoppable' toward 'AI supply chain winners are increasingly jurisdiction- and export-control-dependent.' That is a story change, not just bad ASML headlines.

Barron's: Toll Brothers could lead homebuilder rebound as housing stabilizes

Barron's: Lennar can build on stronger foundation despite margin sacrifice

Benzinga: ARPA-E to commit $135M to fusion technologies

Benzinga Newsdesk: Iran de-escalation pressures oil equities

Benzinga commodity note warns deeper oil supply issues remain unresolved

Benzinga/market coverage suggests Middle East de-escalation near term

Benzinga: Boeing delivers ViaSat-3 ahead of SpaceX launch

Palantir faces UK ethical scrutiny despite continued AI/defense enthusiasm

Continuation of prior session: war headlines alone still are not enough; market wants procurement visibility. Today's ceasefire tone reinforces that rather than changing it.

GuruFocus: Mizuho cuts targets 25% across IonQ/D-Wave/Rigetti

Zacks: IonQ government contracts support strategic relevance

Zacks: Rigetti USask/Novera delivery shows ecosystem progress

The story is shifting from 'breakthrough optionality' toward 'capital-markets discipline is arriving before commercial scale.' Government and academic wins still validate the technology, but sell-side target cuts show the market is beginning to separate strategic relevance from investable timing. That's a genuine narrative downgrade for the sleeve.

GuruFocus: Novo launches lower-priced Wegovy HD

Simply Wall St./Insider Monkey: Novo-Hims distribution expansion

Continuation of prior session's two-track shift: category growth remains strong, but competition is increasingly about pricing, access, and channel control.

Benzinga: China App Store takedown of Dorsey messaging app underscores regulatory friction for decentralized products

Zacks/Simply Wall St.: Block expands Square enterprise reach and Cash App monetization

No new shift beyond prior session's bifurcation. Infrastructure/fintech rails are improving, but decentralization narratives remain vulnerable to policy and platform gatekeepers.

MT Newswires: gold steady amid inflation worries and Iran conflict backdrop

Benzinga: ceasefire optimism tempers immediate panic bid

AI supply-chain geopolitics is linking ai_compute and defensive: export-control risk on semicap is pushing part of the market narrative away from pure growth beta toward hedges and non-tech value.

Energy policy and AI infrastructure remain connected: ARPA-E fusion support reinforces the prior 'power is the bottleneck' theme, even as oil de-escalation reduces near-term commodity stress.

Defense and quantum are converging through government contracts, but equity markets are rewarding funded relevance more than frontier-tech storytelling.

Biotech and digital health are converging around GLP-1 distribution: winners may increasingly be those controlling access, pricing, and consumer channels rather than only molecule ownership.

Summary: Session tone is slightly risk-off beneath a surface relief bid. The two real narrative developments are: 1) AI compute's story is becoming more policy-fragile as ASML export restrictions threaten a key equipment choke point, and 2) quantum is being forced out of pure hype framing into valuation/timing scrutiny. Elsewhere, biotech remains the cleanest constructive narrative with GLP-1 demand broadening into pricing and distribution competition, while defense merely confirms the prior lesson that geopolitical headlines need procurement follow-through to matter for equities.

Secular AI demand is still intact, with positive technology catalysts around agentic AI, foundry validation, and continued EUV order flow. Quant is not broken outright: 6m theme momentum is positive at 10.15%, with strong pockets in TSM, ASML, AMD, and GOOG, and several high Sharpe names still showing quality leadership.

A genuine negative narrative shift has emerged: AI supply-chain leadership is becoming more policy-fragile, especially around ASML and China export restrictions. Macro is mildly negative in a persistent BEAR regime, 3m momentum has rolled over to -3.43%, and average relative strength vs SPY is negative at -2.22, showing weakening confirmation.

Housing-stabilization narratives are improving modestly, and some subsectors are acting better than the headline macro suggests: O, SPG, TOL, and AMT show positive recent momentum or relative strength. Housing starts improving YoY also gives this sleeve a cyclical floor if rates stop worsening.

This remains the clearest macro headwind among major themes. Fed remains restrictive, consumer sentiment is weak, theme macro impact is strongly negative at -0.55, and quant is still soft with -8.22% 6m momentum, -3.28% 3m momentum, and negative average relative strength. Prior risk flags on LEN drawdown remain close enough that there is no reason to re-risk.

The structural thesis remains attractive: AI power demand, grid modernization, and policy support via ARPA-E keep the long-term story alive. There are real winners inside the basket—GEV and NEE show strong momentum, strong relative strength, and solid Sharpe, supporting the idea that proven infrastructure beneficiaries still work.

This is exactly the kind of theme where the story is better than the tape. Macro is still negative, 3m theme momentum is weak at -10.51%, average relative strength is -6.35, volatility is high, and prior sessions repeatedly vetoed increases because SMR remains in severe portfolio drawdown breach at -21.71%, with CEG also stressed at -10.13%. Conditions have not improved enough to re-propose a +1.

This is the cleanest pro-risk add outside pure defensives. Macro drag is limited, narrative is stable-to-slightly positive, and quant is excellent: 26.33% 6m momentum, 22.4% 3m momentum, +9.7 average relative strength, strong Sharpe across most names, and generally contained drawdowns. In a BEAR regime, defense is showing exactly the kind of durable relative leadership we want.

The narrative is not accelerating; it is merely holding. Ceasefire/de-escalation headlines reduce urgency, and prior sessions correctly noted that war headlines alone are not enough without procurement visibility. PLTR also adds some idiosyncratic volatility and drawdown stress to an otherwise solid sleeve.

Government contracts and ecosystem progress still validate long-run strategic relevance, and the sleeve is already at minimum conviction, limiting further practical downside in portfolio stance. Some 6m support from GOOG and RGTI shows the theme is not entirely devoid of sponsorship.

This is a clear negative setup. There is a genuine negative narrative shift toward valuation/timing discipline, macro is unfavorable for speculative duration, 3m momentum is deeply negative at -25.11%, relative strength is awful at -23.21, volatility and VaR are extreme, concentration is elevated at HHI 0.3061, and portfolio drawdowns remain severe for IONQ and RGTI. This remains one of the weakest sleeves.

Biotech has the best constructive narrative outside defense/defensive: GLP-1 demand, pricing innovation, oral formulations, and distribution expansion all support a broadening category. Macro is only slightly negative, and current conviction is very low, so a modest increase is justified even without perfect quant confirmation. The sleeve also has some defensive growth characteristics in a BEAR tape.

Quant confirmation is incomplete. Theme 3m momentum is -7.61%, average relative strength is poor at -13.87, and performance is highly mixed, with NVO notably weak. This is more of a narrative-led early add than a fully confirmed trend, so sizing should remain restrained.

Fintech rails and monetization progress at Block/XYZ show that not every component is broken, and the sleeve is already at minimum conviction. If macro liquidity improves later, this theme could rebound sharply from depressed levels.

Macro is the worst here at -0.6, narrative remains slightly negative with ongoing regulatory/platform friction, and quant is decisively poor: -38.27% 6m momentum, -21.3% 3m momentum, -15.08 relative strength, very high volatility, elevated concentration at HHI 0.3061, and severe drawdowns in COIN and MSTR. Prior veto reasons remain unresolved, so this should stay de-emphasized.

This sleeve is doing exactly what it should in the current regime. Macro is positive, narrative is constructive with GLD inflows, and quant is strong across momentum, relative strength, low volatility, and shallow drawdowns. In a persistent BEAR regime, this remains the portfolio’s best ballast.

At conviction 9 already, much of the good news is reflected in positioning. Prior session attempts to increase were vetoed at the portfolio level, and ceasefire/de-escalation headlines could temporarily reduce the urgency of hedge demand. TLT and PG also show that not every defensive component is uniformly strong.

Bullish-leaning analyst bias (0.55): I looked for selective adds, but persistent BEAR regime and unresolved risk veto conditions kept me disciplined. I only recommend increases where narrative and quant are sufficiently resilient.

Summary: The regime remains firmly risk-off, so I am not re-submitting broad pro-cyclical increases that were vetoed in prior sessions. The strongest positive case is defense_aerospace, where relative strength and momentum are already proving out despite only modest narrative help. Biotech_health earns a small +1 as a low-base, narrative-led add with manageable macro drag, though quant is still mixed. I hold ai_compute and energy_grid steady because their structural stories remain alive but current narrative/quant conditions do not justify fighting the tape, especially given prior vetoes. I remain negative on quantum and crypto_digital, where both narrative and quant are still decisively weak and prior risk objections remain unresolved. Defensive stays high conviction but unchanged because it is already near max conviction and prior increase attempts were vetoed.

Macro headwind remains negative in a firm BEAR regime (impact_score -0.15) while short-term momentum is weakening: theme 3m momentum is -3.43% and relative strength vs SPY is -2.22%.

Theme average volatility is high at 43.57%, with several names materially above tolerance: SMCI 78.61%, AMD 63.45%.

Multiple constituents exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold: NVDA 3.55%, AMD 4.59%, AVGO 3.84%, TSM 3.12%, SMCI 6.53%, ASML 3.73%.

Realized drawdown stress is building in select names from our entry points: ASML -6.64%, SMCI -5.74%, META -4.80%, MSFT -2.80%.

This is the clearest macro casualty: theme impact_score is -0.55 in a restrictive-rate BEAR regime.

Momentum is weak across the sleeve: theme 6m momentum -8.22%, 3m momentum -3.28%, relative strength vs SPY -2.47%.

Daily VaR breaches the 3% threshold in DHI 3.36%, LEN 3.73%, and RKT 5.05%.

LEN portfolio drawdown is -8.39%, only 1.61 percentage points from the theme max-drawdown limit of 10%.

Several constituents have poor risk-adjusted performance: LEN Sharpe -0.454, SHW -0.075, while RKT combines weak momentum with 57.91% volatility.

Active drawdown breach: SMR portfolio drawdown is -21.71%, exceeding the theme max-drawdown limit of 12% by 9.71 percentage points.

CEG portfolio drawdown is -10.13%, only 1.87 percentage points from the same 12% theme limit.

Theme average volatility is very high at 61.13%; SMR is 104.60%, UEC 75.99%, FSLR 63.23%.

Multiple severe VaR breaches: CEG 4.56%, FSLR 5.11%, SMR 9.80%, UEC 7.05%, GEV 4.30%.

Short-term momentum is deteriorating despite structural narrative support: theme 3m momentum -10.51% and relative strength vs SPY -6.35%.

Prior-session risk has worsened, not healed: SMR drawdown moved from -21.58% to -21.71%.

This is one of the few sleeves with positive trend support: theme 6m momentum 26.33%, 3m momentum 22.40%, relative strength vs SPY 9.70%.

Risk is not absent: PLTR carries 56.29% volatility, 5.57% daily VaR, and a -6.70% portfolio drawdown.

Theme concentration is below the formal flag threshold but still notable at HHI 0.1834 given conviction is already 5 and max allocation is 12%.

Narrative support is less robust than price action suggests; prior sessions noted investors want funded procurement visibility, not just geopolitical headlines.

Theme concentration breaches the limit: HHI 0.3061 > 0.25.

Macro headwind is strong for speculative duration assets (impact_score -0.35) and momentum is poor: theme 3m momentum -25.11%, relative strength vs SPY -23.21%.

Theme average volatility is extreme at 66.82%; IONQ 95.36% and RGTI 108.96%.

Daily VaR is far above threshold: IONQ 8.01%, RGTI 8.78%, IBM 3.05%.

Realized drawdowns from our entries remain severe: IONQ -13.95%, RGTI -12.85%.

Historical drawdown profile is unacceptable for a BEAR regime: IONQ max drawdown -67.61%, RGTI -77.10%. Although within the theme's 25% max-drawdown limit from entry, the sleeve remains structurally fragile.

Momentum is soft: theme 3m momentum -7.61% and relative strength vs SPY -13.87%.

Theme average volatility is elevated at 43.63%, with CRSP at 63.79% and NVO at 53.87%.

Daily VaR breaches the 3% threshold in LLY 3.53%, NVO 4.40%, and CRSP 5.88%.

Risk-adjusted performance is mixed to weak in key names: NVO Sharpe -0.774, ISRG -0.027.

Portfolio drawdowns are manageable but present: ISRG -5.25%, ABBV -5.11%, LLY -2.45%.

This sleeve faces the strongest macro headwind in the book (impact_score -0.60) under a 99.4%-confidence BEAR regime.

Momentum is decisively negative: theme 6m momentum -38.27%, 3m momentum -21.30%, relative strength vs SPY -15.08%.

Theme average volatility is extreme at 70.54%.

All constituents breach the 3% daily VaR threshold by a wide margin: COIN 6.48%, MSTR 7.09%, MARA 7.72%, XYZ 5.17%.

Realized drawdowns remain acute from our entry points: COIN -12.68%, MSTR -11.08%.

Historical drawdown profile is severe: COIN -66.39%, MSTR -76.53%, MARA -70.53% max drawdowns.

This is the only sleeve with positive macro support in current conditions (impact_score 0.20).

Trend and relative strength are favorable: theme 6m momentum 17.40%, 3m momentum 11.19%, relative strength vs SPY 11.33%.

Volatility is the lowest in the portfolio at 17.93% average, and no constituent breaches the 3% daily VaR threshold.

Minor caution only: TLT and PG have negative Sharpe ratios (-0.58 and -0.826), so hedge quality is mixed within the sleeve.

Energy_grid breach: SMR portfolio drawdown is -21.71%, exceeding the theme max-drawdown limit of 12%.

Energy_grid warning: CEG portfolio drawdown is -10.13%, only 1.87 percentage points from the 12% limit.

Real_estate warning: LEN portfolio drawdown is -8.39%, only 1.61 percentage points from the 10% limit.

Quantum stress remains severe from entry: IONQ -13.95%, RGTI -12.85%.

Crypto_digital stress remains severe from entry: COIN -12.68%, MSTR -11.08%.

Summary: Risk remains decisively skewed to the downside. The portfolio is operating inside a persistent BEAR regime with very high confidence, and the same conditions that triggered the last three vetoes are still present. This is not a correlation-driven concentration problem at the cross-theme level; it is a regime-plus-internal-fragility problem. The main risk clusters are speculative sleeves with extreme volatility, repeated VaR breaches, and unresolved drawdown stress: energy_grid (driven by SMR), quantum, and crypto_digital. Real_estate is also vulnerable due to rate sensitivity and weakening momentum. Defense_aerospace and defensive are the only relatively stable sleeves, but that is not enough to justify adding risk elsewhere. Maintain the veto on all conviction increases. If action is taken, it should be defensive: reduce energy_grid speculative exposure first, continue trimming quantum and crypto_digital, avoid adding to real_estate, and keep defensive conviction at or above the floor.

Summary: VETOED: Portfolio-level risk remains in veto territory. The market regime is firmly BEAR with 99.4% confidence, 18-day persistence, and a 0.98 BEAR->BEAR continuation probability. The prior veto conditions have not been resolved: quantum and crypto_digital still breach concentration limits (HHI 0.3061 > 0.25), multiple themes still carry daily VaR above the 3% threshold, and realized drawdown stress remains active from our entry points. Energy_grid still has a live drawdown breach with SMR at -21.71% versus the theme max-drawdown limit of 12%. Quantum remains deeply stressed with IONQ at -13.95% and RGTI at -12.85%, while crypto_digital remains acutely stressed with COIN at -12.68% and MSTR at -11.08%. No conviction increases should be approved this session.. Only conviction decreases applied.

Summary: 17 orders, 11 sells, 6 buys, turnover 7.03%, regime sizing 50%