HMM market regime is firmly BEAR with 100% state probability and very high persistence (~216 days; BEAR->BEAR transition 0.998). This implies sustained risk-off positioning and continued pressure on high-beta growth/early-cycle themes.

Restrictive/neutral-tight: policy rate is still elevated at 3.64% (FEDFUNDS). With inflation not fully back to target (CPI YoY 2.66%), the Fed is unlikely to rapidly pivot to aggressive easing, keeping discount rates and financial conditions relatively tight.

Cooling but not fully resolved: CPI YoY at 2.66% suggests disinflation vs prior-year levels, but it remains above a typical 2% target, supporting a cautious stance on rate-sensitive and long-duration exposures.

Mixed-to-slowing risk: GDP YoY is strong at 5.42%, but the labor market is weakening (UNRATE 4.4% vs 4.0% prior year; jobless claims rising to 205k from 208k prior month—slightly improving, but unemployment trend is still a headwind). Yield curve is not inverted (T10Y2Y spread +0.51%), which reduces recession-signal severity, but the BEAR regime and elevated VIX (26.78) indicate markets are pricing downside risk anyway.

Explanation: Macro is risk-off (BEAR regime; VIX 26.78 elevated) which typically compresses multiples for high-duration growth. Fed remains restrictive (3.64%) and CPI is still above target (2.66%), limiting enthusiasm for long-capex cycles. While GDP growth is strong (5.42%) and manufacturing employment is elevated (MANEMP 12573), the overall market regime dominates, making the net macro tailwind modest-to-negative.

Explanation: Direct rate sensitivity: Fed funds at 3.64% and inflation not fully at target (2.66%) keep mortgage/financing costs pressured. Consumer sentiment is weak (UMCSENT 56.4 vs 71.7 prior year), which undermines housing demand. Housing starts are positive (HOUST +9.5% YoY to 1487k), but the BEAR regime and elevated VIX (26.78) likely overwhelm the housing improvement, producing a clear net headwind.

Explanation: Energy/grid has some insulation from pure consumer demand and benefits from infrastructure capex narratives, and housing starts are rising (+9.5% YoY). However, the BEAR regime and elevated risk aversion (VIX 26.78) reduce appetite for cyclical/industrial beta. With yield curve not inverted (+0.51% spread), recession pressure is less acute than in a classic inversion scenario, so the headwind is present but not severe.

Explanation: Defense is relatively macro-insensitive versus rates and consumer sentiment, so restrictive policy and weak sentiment matter less. Still, a BEAR regime with elevated VIX (26.78) can pressure equities broadly and increase discount-rate sensitivity for all sectors. Net effect is slightly negative but close to neutral.

Explanation: Quantum is high-risk/high-duration and typically trades like an early-stage growth option. In a BEAR regime (100% state probability) with elevated VIX (26.78), risk capital is scarce and valuations compress. Even with solid GDP growth (5.42%), the macro/risk backdrop is a strong headwind for speculative tech.

Explanation: Biotech has some defensive characteristics via secular demand, but it still carries equity risk and often behaves like growth/innovation exposure. Elevated VIX (26.78) and BEAR regime reduce risk appetite and raise the hurdle rate for speculative cash flows. Inflation and rates are not easing aggressively (CPI 2.66%, Fed 3.64%), creating a moderate headwind.

Explanation: Crypto/digital assets are sensitive to liquidity and risk appetite; elevated VIX (26.78) and a firmly BEAR regime are typically negative. While GDP growth is strong (5.42%), the market is still pricing stress, which tends to hurt crypto beta and related equity exposures.

Explanation: Defensive/hedge themes benefit in risk-off regimes, but the signal is not strongly supportive because inflation is still above target (2.66%) and the Fed remains restrictive (3.64%), which can limit bond-like defensives’ upside. Consumer sentiment is weak (56.4), which can help staples/defensives, but elevated VIX (26.78) also implies broader drawdown risk. Net is mildly positive.

BEAR regime persistence (0.998 BEAR->BEAR) suggests continued valuation pressure across growth/early-stage themes.

If CPI re-accelerates above 2.66% or inflation expectations rise, rate-sensitive and long-duration themes could face renewed headwinds.

Labor market deterioration risk: UNRATE is rising (4.4% vs 4.0% prior year). A sharper jump in unemployment would worsen risk sentiment further.

VIX remains elevated (26.78); sustained volatility can prevent stabilization rallies even if some fundamentals (e.g., GDP 5.42%, housing starts +9.5% YoY) look supportive.

Summary: Macro conditions are dominated by a persistent BEAR regime and elevated volatility (VIX 26.78). Fed policy remains restrictive (3.64%) with CPI still above target (2.66%), creating headwinds for rate-sensitive and long-duration growth. Housing starts and GDP growth are supportive on the margin, but weak consumer sentiment (UMCSENT 56.4) and risk-off positioning keep most themes under pressure, with defensives the relative winner.

Musk says SpaceX and Tesla to build advanced chip factories in Austin

Tesla Stock Rises As Elon Musk Announces Terafab Project

Which chip stocks are set to benefit from Musk’s massive Terafab plans?

Nvidia May Redesign Feynman Chip on TSMC Limits

Fast Chips, Big Money, 3:30 a.m. Calls: Taiwan’s Urgent Quest to Win Over Trump

Samsung Targets SK Hynix AI Lead With $73 Billion Blitz

Stock Market Today: Dow Surges As Trump Delays Iran Strikes; Yields Fall, Homebuilders Jump (Live Coverage)

One Beverly Hills Announces $4.3B Financing Deal Through JPMorgan And VICI Properties For Downtown Los Angeles Project

Shares of oil-related companies are trading lower after President Trump announced in a Truth Social post the suspension of U.S. strikes on Iranian power generation and energy infrastructure for five days, subject to the outcome of ongoing discussions.

Chevron CEO Wirth Says Demand For Gas In US Will Continue To Grow As Oil Plateaus

Chevron CEO Wirth Says Technology Will Continue To Help Growth In Permian

Northrop Stock Drops After President Trump Post. Why Defense Still Can’t Catch a Break.

Lockheed Martin Expands Counter Drone And F 16 Viper Upgrade Pipeline

Lockheed Martin Bets On Neuromorphic AI Chips For Future Defense Edge

Alphabet's Wing to start drone delivery in San Francisco Bay Area

Magnificent Seven Correlation Turns Negative as Valuations Drop Below 25x

AI Stocks To Watch: Cybersecurity's RSA On Tap, 'Death Cross' In The Making?

How Investors May Respond To CRISPR Therapeutics (CRSP) $550 Million Convertible Note Boost To Cash Reserves

CRISPR Therapeutics Balances CASGEVY Momentum With Early Pipeline Uncertainty

Bitcoin Price Spikes As Trump Delays Strikes Against Iran

Trump Goes From 'Obliterate' Iran To 'Productive Conversations' In 36 Hours, Crashing Oil 10% — Suspicious Polymarket Accounts Cash In

Coinbase Global Launches Stock Perpetual Futures Contracts

Baird Raises PT on Coinbase Global (COIN) to $215 Amid Crypto Price Appreciation

'OpenAI Taps Former Meta Executive to Lead Ad Push' - WSJ Exclusive

'OpenAI Bets On Altman-Backed Fusion Startup' - Axios

OpenAI Plans To Nearly Double Workforce Amid AI Race With Anthropic, Google

Jim Cramer on Johnson & Johnson: “It’s a Textbook Slowdown Stock”

Barclays Sees Continued Strength in Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Pharma Business

Reuters: Musk says SpaceX and Tesla to build advanced chip factories in Austin

GuruFocus: Nvidia May Redesign Feynman Chip on TSMC Limits

WSJ: Taiwan’s urgent quest to win over Trump

Benzinga Newsdesk: OpenAI bets on Altman-backed fusion startup

Investor's Business Daily: Dow surges as Trump delays Iran strikes; yields fall, homebuilders jump

Benzinga Newsdesk: One Beverly Hills announces $4.3B financing deal

Benzinga Newsdesk: oil-related companies trade lower after strike suspension

Benzinga Newsdesk: Chevron says U.S. gas demand will continue to grow as oil plateaus

This materially extends the prior session’s grid-as-AI-stack thesis: the story is broadening again from 'AI needs power' to 'AI capital is actively seeking dedicated generation pathways, including fusion and gas-backed reliability.' That is a more durable narrative for grid, gas, nuclear, and power-infrastructure incumbents than a narrow renewables-only framing.

Barrons: Northrop stock drops after Trump post; defense still can’t catch a break

Simply Wall St.: Lockheed expands counter-drone and F-16 Viper pipeline

Benzinga: Trump-Iran headline reversal and Polymarket activity

The market story is shifting from 'geopolitical tension automatically lifts defense' to 'de-escalation headlines can overwhelm backlog fundamentals in the short run.' Defense remains structurally supported, but it is losing its clean role as the immediate geopolitical hedge when diplomacy abruptly reprices conflict risk.

Reuters: Alphabet's Wing to start drone delivery in San Francisco Bay Area

GuruFocus: Magnificent Seven correlation turns negative as valuations drop below 25x

Investor's Business Daily: AI stocks to watch; death cross concern

Simply Wall St.: CRISPR Therapeutics $550 million convertible note boost to cash reserves

Simply Wall St.: CASGEVY momentum with early pipeline uncertainty

Insider Monkey: Barclays sees continued strength in JNJ pharma business

Investor's Business Daily: Bitcoin price spikes as Trump delays strikes against Iran

CryptoProwl: Coinbase launches stock perpetual futures contracts

Benzinga: Trump-Iran reversal and suspicious Polymarket accounts cash in

Insider Monkey: Baird raises PT on Coinbase amid crypto price appreciation

Investor's Business Daily: yields fall, homebuilders jump

Insider Monkey: JNJ is a textbook slowdown stock

AI and energy narratives are converging further: Terafab plus OpenAI/fusion reinforces that compute buildouts increasingly require dedicated power solutions, benefiting energy_grid alongside ai_compute.

Geopolitical de-escalation is acting as a cross-asset risk-on release valve: positive for real_estate and crypto_digital via lower yields/oil, but negative for defense_aerospace as conflict premium fades.

Crypto market structure is maturing beyond spot-beta: Coinbase stock perpetuals and Polymarket attention support the prior-session thesis that crypto exposure is broadening into financial infrastructure and event markets.

Summary: Session tone is modestly risk-on after the Trump-Iran pause hit oil and yields, but the higher-alpha signal is narrative linkage rather than headline relief. The most important continuation is in energy_grid: the prior 'power is part of the AI stack' shift is strengthening into a more investable story where AI players seek dedicated generation and reliability, not just more chips. AI_compute remains mixed-positive because Terafab and OpenAI expansion support demand, but TSMC capacity/geopolitical constraints still cap indiscriminate upside. Defense shows the clearest fresh narrative deterioration as de-escalation headlines suppress the old automatic-war-premium trade despite solid contract flow. Crypto remains positively biased, with the prior shift toward market-structure expansion still intact rather than newly changing.

AI demand remains structurally intact, with Terafab, OpenAI hiring, and fusion-linked power investment reinforcing that compute capex is broadening into a full-stack infrastructure buildout. Relative strength is roughly flat at the theme level despite a harsh macro regime, with notable leadership from TSM, ASML, and GOOG suggesting the winners are still attracting capital.

Macro remains a modest headwind in a persistent BEAR regime, and the narrative is only mildly positive rather than a fresh shift. Quant internals are mixed with severe drawdowns in several key names, elevated average volatility, and prior risk vetoes specifically flagged this theme's unresolved drawdown/VaR problems. Without clear improvement in risk metrics, another increase would likely be blocked.

There is some tactical relief from falling yields, homebuilder strength, improving housing starts, and fresh financing activity, which argues the theme may be stabilizing from depressed conviction levels. Risk is lower than the more speculative themes, and select REITs show positive relative strength.

This remains one of the clearest macro headwinds given restrictive rates, weak consumer sentiment, and a persistent BEAR regime. Theme-average relative strength is still negative, drawdowns remain widespread, and prior sessions repeatedly cut conviction here for good reason. The narrative is positive but not a true shift strong enough to overcome the macro setup.

This is still the strongest thematic story in the book: the narrative shift is real and strengthening, with AI increasingly tied to dedicated generation, gas reliability, fusion optionality, and grid infrastructure. Despite weak macro, the theme has pockets of exceptional quant leadership such as GEV, NEE, and UEC, and the strategic linkage to AI capex gives it durable secular support.

This is exactly the kind of theme that has been vetoed repeatedly: current conviction is already high, macro is still slightly negative, and risk metrics remain extreme with very high volatility, severe VaR breaches, and catastrophic drawdowns in SMR, CEG, UEC, and FSLR. Since the prior veto reason has not materially improved, proposing another increase would ignore the council feedback.

Longer-term fundamentals remain solid through backlog, counter-drone demand, aircraft upgrades, and generally strong relative strength versus SPY. The basket is one of the better quantitative profiles in the universe, with strong Sharpe ratios, manageable volatility, and relatively contained drawdowns outside PLTR.

The key new information is a negative narrative shift: de-escalation headlines are breaking the market's assumption that geopolitical stress automatically boosts defense stocks in the short run. With macro only neutral-to-slightly negative and the immediate hedge premium fading, the narrative deterioration outweighs the still-good quant backdrop for now.

There is still asymmetric upside if broader AI and advanced-compute enthusiasm spills into quantum, and GOOG provides some ballast. Narrative tone is not outright negative, so the theme retains optionality for future upside if a genuine breakthrough catalyst emerges.

This remains one of the weakest fits for the current regime: macro is strongly negative for speculative duration, narrative is basically flat with no shift, relative strength is deeply negative, concentration is high, volatility is extreme, and drawdowns are severe. Prior risk concerns around concentration and downside remain unresolved, so a modest de-risking is warranted.

Biotech still has secular support from innovation, CRISPR cash runway improvement, and pharma resilience, while the narrative is mildly constructive. The theme can regain favor quickly if investors rotate toward idiosyncratic growth less tied to macro cycles.

The quant picture is weak: theme relative strength is materially negative, Sharpe is poor across several major names, and drawdowns remain heavy, especially in NVO and CRSP. Macro is still a moderate headwind and there is no narrative shift strong enough to justify maintaining an above-neutral conviction in a persistent BEAR regime.

Narrative remains one of the better ones in the book, with Bitcoin responding positively to de-escalation, Coinbase expanding market structure, and the broader thesis evolving beyond pure spot-beta into infrastructure and event-market monetization. Current conviction is only mid-level, so there is room for upside later if quants improve.

Macro remains hostile for liquidity-sensitive beta, and the quant profile is still poor with negative relative strength, extreme volatility, severe drawdowns, weak Sharpe, and high concentration. Prior sessions already saw attempted increases vetoed on exactly these grounds, and those risk conditions have not improved enough to re-press the bullish case.

This is the cleanest macro fit in a persistent BEAR regime: defensives have mild macro support, positive narrative tone, strong relative strength, low volatility, solid Sharpe in JNJ and GLD, and shallow drawdowns. Given repeated portfolio-level vetoes citing insufficient defensive offset, increasing conviction here is the most practical bullish adjustment available.

The upside may be less explosive than cyclical or innovation themes, and bond-like defensives can still be capped by restrictive policy. Prior attempts to raise this theme were vetoed at the portfolio level, so even a sensible increase may still face scrutiny if the council wants broader gross risk reduction first.

Summary: I am leaning bullish where possible, but prior veto history matters: repeated attempts to add to energy_grid, defense, crypto, and defensive were blocked because portfolio risk never improved. This session, the best constructive move is to raise defensive exposure as the most regime-consistent offset, while respecting unresolved risk in high-beta themes. Energy_grid still has the strongest secular narrative, but with conviction already at 8 and risk metrics still extreme, the right call is to hold rather than press. I trim defense on the fresh negative narrative shift, and modestly reduce quantum and biotech where macro and quants remain unsupportive.

Theme operates against a persistent BEAR regime with 100% state probability and elevated VIX 26.78, a poor backdrop for long-duration growth.

Theme-average volatility is 44.27%, elevated for a 25% max-allocation sleeve.

Multiple holdings exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold: NVDA -3.75%, AMD -5.38%, AVGO -4.13%, TSM -3.51%, SMCI -7.54%, ASML -3.73%, AMZN -3.05%.

Theme max-drawdown limit is 15%, but nearly the entire basket breaches it: NVDA -22.32%, AMD -31.88%, AVGO -25.41%, TSM -21.96%, SMCI -66.18%, MSFT -29.55%, GOOG -15.17%, AMZN -21.74%, META -25.42%.

Relative strength is weak at theme average -0.18 vs SPY, with major laggards including SMCI -27.28, MSFT -17.73, META -4.61, AMZN -3.91.

Several holdings have weak or negative Sharpe ratios, including SMCI -0.556, MSFT -0.17, META -0.047, indicating poor risk-adjusted payoff despite high volatility.

Prior-session veto condition has not materially improved; conviction was reduced from 7 to 6 earlier, but risk metrics remain broadly unchanged.

Macro headwind is strong at -0.55 due to restrictive rates, weak consumer sentiment, and BEAR regime pressure on rate-sensitive assets.

Theme max-drawdown limit is 10%, but almost all holdings exceed it: DHI -27.67%, LEN -36.41%, TOL -20.54%, VMC -22.20%, MLM -20.82%, SHW -19.11%, AMT -27.48%, SPG -17.63%, RKT -41.77%.

Several holdings exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold: DHI -3.46%, LEN -3.84%, TOL -3.13%, RKT -5.36%.

Theme-average relative strength is negative at -2.18 vs SPY, with notable weakness in LEN -9.90 and RKT -21.90.

Risk-adjusted returns are weak in key names: LEN Sharpe -0.563, SHW -0.400, AMT -0.894.

Although conviction has been cut across prior sessions from 6 to 3, the underlying drawdown and VaR profile remains impaired.

This is the highest-conviction risk pocket in the portfolio at conviction 8 despite only moderate risk tolerance and 15% max allocation.

Theme-average volatility is 62.42%, far too high for a moderate-risk theme.

Multiple holdings exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold severely: CEG -4.67%, FSLR -5.46%, SMR -9.93%, UEC -7.05%, GEV -4.43%.

Theme max-drawdown limit is 12%, but most holdings are far beyond it: CEG -38.84%, FSLR -33.51%, SMR -78.59%, UEC -39.97%, GEV -20.98%; only NEE at -11.13% is near the limit.

Dispersion is extreme, indicating unstable theme construction: NEE shows +17.29 relative strength while FSLR -25.51 and SMR -24.58 lag badly.

SMR combines 105.85% volatility, -9.93% daily VaR, and -78.59% max drawdown, making it a severe tail-risk component.

Prior vetoes repeatedly flagged this theme, yet conviction remains unchanged at 8 and conditions have not improved.

This is one of the stronger sleeves fundamentally, with theme-average relative strength +15.37 vs SPY and generally strong Sharpe ratios.

However, PLTR injects growth-beta risk into an otherwise defensive basket: 57.22% volatility, -5.69% daily VaR, and -37.81% max drawdown.

Theme max-drawdown limit is 10%, and all holdings exceed it to some degree: LMT -15.56, RTX -16.15, NOC -15.56, PLTR -37.81, LHX -11.23, GD -10.27.

BEAR regime still creates broad equity downside even for relatively resilient sectors.

Theme faces a strong macro headwind of -0.45 in a persistent BEAR regime, especially harmful for speculative long-duration assets.

Concentration HHI is 0.3061, above the 0.25 concentration threshold.

Theme-average volatility is 67.42%, extremely elevated.

Daily VaR breaches are severe: IONQ -8.18%, RGTI -8.78%, IBM -3.03%; only GOOG is below threshold at -2.31%.

Theme max-drawdown limit is 25%, but IONQ -62.93%, RGTI -73.59%, and IBM -29.09% all breach badly.

Theme-average relative strength is deeply negative at -18.71 vs SPY.

This theme was part of prior veto conditions and shows no material healing in concentration, VaR, or drawdown.

Macro backdrop is moderately negative at -0.25 and risk appetite remains poor for innovation-heavy healthcare exposures.

Theme-average relative strength is -12.16 vs SPY, indicating broad underperformance.

Theme-average volatility is 44.50%, elevated for a moderate-risk theme.

Several holdings exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold: LLY -3.59%, NVO -4.70%, CRSP -6.17%.

Theme max-drawdown limit is 12%, but all holdings breach it: LLY -30.40%, NVO -54.93%, CRSP -40.24%, ISRG -24.09%, ABBV -18.79%.

Risk-adjusted returns are weak or negative in several names: NVO Sharpe -1.143, ISRG -0.134, ABBV -0.118.

Conviction remains 6 despite widespread drawdown-limit breaches.

Theme faces a strong macro headwind of -0.40 in a persistent BEAR regime with elevated VIX, a poor setup for liquidity-sensitive crypto beta.

Concentration HHI is 0.3061, above the 0.25 threshold.

Theme-average volatility is 71.41%, extremely elevated.

All holdings exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold by a wide margin: COIN -6.48%, MSTR -7.61%, MARA -8.31%, XYZ -5.27%.

Theme max-drawdown limit is 20%, but all holdings are far beyond it: COIN -66.39%, MSTR -76.53%, MARA -70.53%, XYZ -39.48%.

Theme-average relative strength is -9.70 vs SPY, and Sharpe is negative in key names including MSTR -0.923 and MARA -0.332.

Prior vetoes explicitly flagged this sleeve; no material improvement is visible in concentration, VaR, or drawdown.

This is the only sleeve with a positive macro impact score (+0.10) and positive theme-average relative strength (+7.59 vs SPY).

Theme-average volatility is low at 18.78%, and all daily VaR readings remain below the 3% threshold.

However, the theme max-drawdown limit is 5%, and all holdings exceed it: KO -11.14%, PG -19.93%, JNJ -11.75%, GLD -18.63%, TLT -9.56%.

Some components have weak risk-adjusted returns, notably PG Sharpe -0.894 and TLT -0.726.

Despite being the portfolio hedge sleeve, conviction is only 5, which is insufficient given the current BEAR regime persistence.

ai_compute breaches its 15% max-drawdown limit across nearly the entire basket, worst at SMCI -66.18%, AMD -31.88%, MSFT -29.55%, META -25.42%.

real_estate breaches its 10% max-drawdown limit across almost all holdings, worst at RKT -41.77%, LEN -36.41%, AMT -27.48%, DHI -27.67%.

quantum breaches its 25% max-drawdown limit in 3 of 4 holdings, worst at RGTI -73.59% and IONQ -62.93%.

biotech_health breaches its 12% max-drawdown limit across the full basket, worst at NVO -54.93%, CRSP -40.24%, LLY -30.40%.

crypto_digital breaches its 20% max-drawdown limit across all holdings, worst at MSTR -76.53%, MARA -70.53%, COIN -66.39%.

defensive also breaches its conservative 5% max-drawdown limit across all holdings, though absolute losses remain materially smaller than high-beta themes.

Summary: Risk remains decisively elevated at the portfolio level and still warrants a veto on any conviction increases. The core issue is not simple volatility; it is the combination of a fully persistent BEAR regime, repeated prior-session veto conditions that have not healed, and multiple existing sleeves with severe VaR and drawdown breaches. Energy_grid is the most problematic because it still carries conviction 8 despite 62.42% theme volatility, VaR as bad as -9.93%, and drawdowns to -78.59%. AI, biotech, real estate, quantum, and crypto all continue to violate their drawdown limits broadly, while quantum and crypto also breach concentration thresholds with HHI 0.3061. Cross-theme correlations are low, so this is not a correlation-cluster problem; it is a multi-sleeve downside-quality problem. Defense_aerospace is relatively resilient and can be held, but high-beta and speculative sleeves should be reduced or exited. Defensive exposure should be increased to at least conviction 6 as a minimum floor for this regime.

Summary: VETOED: Portfolio-level risk remains in veto territory. The market regime is firmly BEAR with 100% confidence, 216-day persistence, and 0.998 BEAR->BEAR continuation probability. Prior veto conditions have not improved materially across sessions: energy_grid remains conviction 8 with 62.42% theme volatility, multiple daily VaR breaches above 3% up to 9.93% (SMR), and drawdowns to -78.59%; ai_compute still has widespread drawdown-limit breaches and multiple VaR breaches; quantum and crypto_digital still carry HHI concentration of 0.3061 (>0.25) plus extreme VaR/drawdown profiles; biotech_health and real_estate continue to breach their drawdown limits broadly. Defensive conviction at 5 is still too low for this regime. No conviction increases should be approved this session.. Only conviction decreases applied.

Summary: 45 orders, 4 sells, 41 buys, turnover 13.95%, regime sizing 50%


HMM market regime is firmly BEAR (100% probability, 216-day persistence; BEAR->BEAR transition 0.998). This implies sustained risk-off positioning and weaker equity risk appetite across growth/tech themes.

Policy is still restrictive: fed funds at 3.64% with inflation moderating (CPI YoY 2.66%). Net effect is “not tightening further, but still not easy,” which keeps discount rates and rate sensitivity a headwind.

Inflation is cooling versus prior-year levels implied by the CPI YoY of 2.66% (near/under typical targets). This is a partial tailwind for risk assets and rate-sensitive sectors, but not enough to overturn the BEAR regime.

Growth appears resilient: GDP YoY 5.42% and ISM Manufacturing employment proxy (MANEMP) is strong at 12,573. However, labor is deteriorating at the margin (UNRATE 4.4% vs 4.0% prior year; jobless claims rising to 205k from 208k prior month—slightly mixed). Overall: growth is not collapsing, but recession risk is not the dominant signal right now because the yield curve is not inverted (T10Y2Y spread +0.51%, not inverted).

Explanation: Macro is risk-off (BEAR regime; VIX 26.78 elevated) which typically compresses multiples for high-duration tech. While inflation is cooler (CPI 2.66%) and GDP is strong (5.42%), the elevated VIX and weak sentiment (UMCSENT 56.4 vs 71.7 prior year) are headwinds for discretionary capex/earnings expectations. Net: meaningful headwind from market risk appetite despite decent macro growth.

Explanation: Real estate is rate- and sentiment-sensitive. Fed funds remain relatively high (3.64%), and consumer sentiment is down sharply YoY (56.4 vs 71.7), both negative. However, housing starts are strong (HOUST +9.5% YoY to 1,487k), which offsets some of the rate/sentiment drag. With BEAR regime and elevated VIX, the balance remains a headwind but less severe than pure rate-tightening would imply.

Explanation: Grid/energy infrastructure can be supported by longer-duration capex narratives, and housing starts +9.5% YoY and GDP strength suggest industrial demand isn’t collapsing. Inflation cooling (2.66% CPI YoY) reduces some cost/expectations pressure. But BEAR regime and elevated VIX (26.78) still pressure risk assets and equity valuations for infrastructure plays. Yield curve is not inverted (+0.51% spread), so recession discounting is less severe. Net: roughly neutral-to-slight headwind.

Explanation: Defense is relatively macro-insensitive, but risk-off markets still reduce willingness to pay for equities broadly (BEAR regime; VIX 26.78). Inflation cooling and solid GDP help the fiscal/industrial backdrop, yet consumer sentiment weakness and elevated volatility can spill over into defense equity risk premia. Net: mild headwind.

Explanation: Quantum is high-beta/high-duration and typically trades like a speculative growth asset. Elevated VIX (26.78) plus BEAR regime strongly reduce risk appetite and liquidity. Even with cooling inflation and solid GDP, the market regime dominates. Net: strong headwind.

Explanation: Biotech has some defensiveness via healthcare demand, but it still behaves like growth/innovation equity under risk-off conditions. Elevated VIX and BEAR regime are headwinds for funding multiples and risk capital. Macro growth (GDP 5.42%) and cooling inflation (2.66%) are partial supports, but not enough to neutralize the market regime. Net: moderate headwind.

Explanation: Crypto is highly sensitive to liquidity and risk appetite. With BEAR regime and elevated VIX (26.78), downside pressure is typically amplified. CPI is cooling (tailwind for real yields), but the dominant factor is risk-off volatility. Net: strong headwind.

Explanation: Defensive/hedge themes benefit in BEAR regimes, especially when volatility is elevated (VIX 26.78). Cooling inflation (CPI 2.66%) can also support bond-like defensives and reduce inflation-risk premia. However, unemployment is drifting up (UNRATE 4.4% vs 4.0% prior year) and consumer sentiment is weaker YoY, which can still pressure defensives depending on credit/earnings. Net: slight tailwind.

BEAR regime dominance: even when macro data is not recessionary (T10Y2Y not inverted), elevated VIX keeps risk premia high.

Labor softening risk: UNRATE rising (4.4% vs 4.0%) could worsen consumer demand and corporate earnings, reinforcing BEAR conditions.

Consumer sentiment deterioration (UMCSENT 56.4 vs 71.7) may hit discretionary components of AI/compute and housing-related cyclicals despite current housing starts strength.

If VIX rises further (>30), high-beta themes (quantum/crypto/AI) likely face nonlinear drawdown pressure.

Summary: Macro is mixed but not recession-confirming (yield curve not inverted; GDP strong; inflation cooling). The dominant driver for theme performance is the firmly BEAR market regime with elevated VIX (26.78) and weaker consumer sentiment, creating broad headwinds for high-duration/speculative themes (quantum, crypto, AI). Rate-sensitive real estate is partially supported by strong housing starts (+9.5% YoY) but still faces rate/sentiment drag. Defensive/hedge themes are the relative bright spot.

Dow Jones Futures: Trump's Iran Comments Spark Stock Market Rally; Micron, Nvidia, Palantir, Tesla Are Big Movers

Vertiv Is Up 64% in 2026 and Wall Street Says It's Still a Buy. Is This the Best Artificial Intelligence (AI) Infrastructure Stock?

Where Could Palantir Be in 3 Years? Here's the Bull Case.

Why Arm Holdings Stock Bumped Higher Today

Why Ciena Stock Rocked the Market on Monday

CRH and the Data Center Buildout: What Investors Miss

CRH Stock Outlook for 2026: IIJA, Water, Data Centers

Shares of homebuilders and housing-related stocks are trading higher as Treasury yields retract following President Trump's suspension of U.S. strikes on Iran's power and energy infrastructure for five days.

Exchange-Traded Funds, Equity Futures Gain Pre-Bell Monday as Trump Declares 5-Day Pause in Iran Energy Attacks

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman On Stepping Down From Helion's Board Says As Helion And OpenAI Start To Explore Working Together, It Is Difficult For Me To Be On Both Boards

Iran War Is Boosting Oil — But A $70 Billion Surge In Battery Stocks Signals A Bigger Shift

Energy: What to watch at CERAWeek amid Iran war, rising oil prices

Is RTX Expanding Missile Capabilities to Boost Defense Strength?

Defense Stocks Show Clear Winners, Losers Amid Ongoing U.S.-Iran Conflict

Investigation connects U.S. missile to residential blast in Bahrain - Reuters

FAA Clears Higher Takeoff Weight For 787-9 And 787-10

'Boeing's certification logjam begins to break with FAA approval of 787 upgrade'- The Air Current

JPMorgan offers clients a new way to hedge AI debt risk

'JPMorgan Offers Clients a New Way to Hedge AI Debt Risk' - Bloomberg

Meta Hires Former Google, Stripe Executives Behind AI Startup Dreamer

Broadcom's AI Revenue Just Doubled to $8.4 Billion. Is This the Most Underrated Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock of 2026?

FDA Clears NVO's Higher Dose of Wegovy: Diversify With These Health ETFs

GLP-1 Race Heats Up with Positive Test Results for Next-Gen Eli Lilly Drug

Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) Expands Zepbound Access as Pricing Reforms Boost Long-Term Growth Outlook

Apogee strengthens case for longer-lasting eczema drug

Shifting Story For Marathon Digital (MARA) As Bitcoin Weakens And AI Pivot Faces Questions

Crypto Miners Are Losing Nearly $20,000 On Each Bitcoin Produced

MARA Holdings Seeks steadier AI Revenue With Starwood Data Center Pivot

MARA Holdings Drops 6%, Riot Platforms Falls 5%: Two Bitcoin Miners Caught Between Energy Costs and an AI Pivot

Iran Conflict Pushes Energy Costs Higher For MARA Holdings Bitcoin Mining

This New Catalyst Could Send XRP Skyrocketing Higher in 2026

Gold ETF Extends Losing Streak

Options Traders Are Really Bearish on Gold

Why Gold Isn't the Shield It Promised to Be | Streetwise

Gold Eyes Worst Month Against Oil Since 1973; Mining Stocks Slump Most Since 2008

Small Caps Rally, Oil Sinks 8% After Trump's 5-Day Iran Strike Pause: What's Moving Markets Monday?

CRH and the Data Center Buildout: What Investors Miss

JPMorgan offers clients a new way to hedge AI debt risk

Broadcom's AI Revenue Just Doubled to $8.4 Billion. Is This the Most Underrated Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock of 2026?

Shifting Story For Marathon Digital (MARA) As Bitcoin Weakens And AI Pivot Faces Questions

CRH Stock Outlook for 2026: IIJA, Water, Data Centers

Iran War Is Boosting Oil — But A $70 Billion Surge In Battery Stocks Signals A Bigger Shift

Gold Eyes Worst Month Against Oil Since 1973; Mining Stocks Slump Most Since 2008

This is a material continuation and strengthening of the prior session's 'power is part of the AI stack' thesis. The new element is that dedicated generation pathways are moving from abstract capex talk toward strategic alignment between frontier AI and power developers (Helion/OpenAI), while downstream beneficiaries now include construction/materials names tied to data-center buildout. The story is broadening from utilities and fuel supply to a full physical build chain.

Is RTX Expanding Missile Capabilities to Boost Defense Strength?

Defense Stocks Show Clear Winners, Losers Amid Ongoing U.S.-Iran Conflict

Investigation connects U.S. missile to residential blast in Bahrain - Reuters

Meta Hires Former Google, Stripe Executives Behind AI Startup Dreamer

FDA Clears NVO's Higher Dose of Wegovy: Diversify With These Health ETFs

GLP-1 Race Heats Up with Positive Test Results for Next-Gen Eli Lilly Drug

Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) Expands Zepbound Access as Pricing Reforms Boost Long-Term Growth Outlook

Apogee strengthens case for longer-lasting eczema drug

Crypto Miners Are Losing Nearly $20,000 On Each Bitcoin Produced

MARA Holdings Drops 6%, Riot Platforms Falls 5%: Two Bitcoin Miners Caught Between Energy Costs and an AI Pivot

Iran Conflict Pushes Energy Costs Higher For MARA Holdings Bitcoin Mining

The story is shifting from 'miners can rerate as AI infrastructure plays' to 'the AI pivot may be a financing narrative rather than an operating solution.' Rising energy sensitivity, weak core mining economics, and skepticism around monetizing HPC/data-center partnerships are undermining the market's willingness to grant crypto miners AI-style multiples.

Options Traders Are Really Bearish on Gold

Why Gold Isn't the Shield It Promised to Be | Streetwise

The defensive narrative is breaking: gold is failing as the default geopolitical hedge when oil/inflation risk dominates and de-escalation headlines trigger liquidation. This is more than weak price action; it challenges the market's assumption that traditional hedges automatically protect during conflict shocks.

AI infrastructure demand is spreading beyond semis into power generation, grid assets, and construction materials; data-center buildout is becoming a shared demand driver for ai_compute, energy_grid, and real_estate.

Geopolitical de-escalation is helping duration/rate-sensitive real estate and broad tech while simultaneously weakening classic hedges like gold.

Higher energy-cost sensitivity is separating 'real' AI infrastructure beneficiaries from narrative tourists; crypto miners are being punished where AI pivots depend on cheap power and unproven execution.

Defense remains structurally supported, but unlike prior sessions it is no longer the cleanest immediate geopolitical hedge because diplomacy headlines can redirect flows into cyclicals and away from hedges.

Summary: Narrative tone is near-neutral at the market level, but dispersion is high. The strongest continuing story is energy_grid, where prior sessions' thesis that power is becoming part of the AI stack is now broadening into a full physical build-chain narrative spanning generation, grid, and construction inputs. The clearest new negative shift is in crypto_digital: the market is becoming less willing to treat bitcoin miners as credible AI infrastructure proxies. A second important shift is defensive, where gold's failure during a geopolitical shock suggests the old hedge playbook is being questioned. AI itself remains modestly positive, but with a more selective tone as financing and power constraints become part of the story rather than background noise.

AI narrative remains modestly positive and broadening into a physical infrastructure stack: Helion/OpenAI and data-center buildout stories support durable demand for compute, power, and enabling materials. Quant internals are mixed rather than broken, with strong relative strength in TSM and ASML and solid Sharpe in several core leaders, which argues against further de-rating if risk appetite stabilizes.

Macro is still a meaningful headwind in a persistent BEAR regime with elevated VIX, and AI remains a high-duration theme vulnerable to multiple compression. Narrative is selective rather than broad-based, with financing/power constraints and AI debt hedging entering the conversation, while theme-average relative strength is flat and drawdowns/VaR remain severe across much of the basket. Prior attempts to add were vetoed on unchanged risk grounds, so there is not enough improvement to re-propose an increase.

Housing starts and yield retracement provide a live cyclical support, while the data-center buildout narrative creates a second leg through construction and materials demand. Parts of the basket show resilience, especially O, AMT, and SPG on relative strength, suggesting the theme is not uniformly weak.

Macro remains a headwind because rates are still restrictive and sentiment is soft in a BEAR regime. Theme-average relative strength is negative, several key names have poor Sharpe or deep drawdowns, and prior sessions already cut conviction here due to persistent risk-limit breaches. The narrative is constructive but not strong enough to overcome unchanged portfolio-risk objections.

This is still the strongest positive narrative in the book. The theme has a genuine narrative shift: power is becoming part of the AI stack, and the story is broadening from utilities into generation, grid equipment, and construction inputs. Macro is close to neutral, which is relatively favorable versus other growth themes, and quant confirmation is decent beneath the surface: GEV and NEE show strong relative strength, Sharpe is healthy across several constituents, and the demand story is becoming more tangible rather than speculative.

Risk remains the obvious problem. Theme volatility is very high, concentration is elevated, VaR breaches are severe, and drawdowns in SMR, CEG, UEC, and FSLR remain extreme. This exact bullish call was vetoed in prior sessions because the risk profile had not improved, and that is still largely true. Any increase here is thesis-driven, not risk-cleared.

Defense remains one of the cleaner relative-strength themes in the set, with strong average RS vs SPY, consistently good Sharpe ratios, and comparatively contained volatility/drawdowns outside PLTR. Structural demand remains intact through missile capacity, aerospace certification progress, and ongoing geopolitical support for spending.

The narrative is no longer accelerating. De-escalation headlines are redirecting flows away from classic geopolitical hedges, and the macro backdrop is still mildly negative for equities overall. Since a prior proposed increase was vetoed and there is no fresh narrative shift or major quant improvement, the prudent bullish stance is to hold rather than press higher.

There is still long-run optionality in the theme, and large-cap platform exposure through GOOG/IBM offers some ballast. If risk appetite returns, deeply sold speculative innovation can rebound sharply from depressed positioning.

This is one of the weakest setups in the universe: strong macro headwind, slightly negative narrative, very poor relative strength, extreme volatility, high concentration, and brutal drawdowns. The AI debt-risk hedging narrative also hurts adjacent speculative compute stories. With no positive shift to offset the regime, conviction should be reduced.

Narrative is clearly positive around GLP-1 expansion, pricing/access improvements, and pipeline progress. Healthcare also has some partial defensiveness versus pure tech, and the current conviction is already modest enough to preserve upside optionality if the positive product cycle starts to dominate.

Quant does not confirm the narrative: relative strength is broadly negative, Sharpe is weak-to-negative in several major names, and drawdowns remain substantial, especially in NVO and CRSP. Macro is still a moderate headwind in a BEAR regime, and prior conviction had already been cut on risk grounds. Positive news flow alone is not enough for an upgrade.

Crypto can rebound violently if liquidity expectations improve, and there are still isolated upside catalysts in token-specific narratives. At low conviction, retaining some exposure preserves convexity.

This is the clearest negative narrative shift in the set. The market is actively rejecting the miner-to-AI rerating story as weak core economics, rising energy costs, and execution skepticism take over. Macro is strongly hostile, relative strength is poor, volatility and concentration are extreme, Sharpe is weak/negative, and drawdowns are catastrophic. This warrants a further cut.

Macro still favors defensives on a relative basis: BEAR regime, elevated VIX, and cooling inflation should support staples and bond-like ballast. Quant is actually solid, with positive average relative strength, low volatility, and good Sharpe in JNJ and GLD. In portfolio construction terms, this remains an important offset to high-beta exposures.

The narrative shift is decisively negative because gold is failing as the default hedge, which weakens the theme's signaling power right when it should be working. Prior attempts to raise conviction were vetoed, and while I remain structurally inclined to like defensives in this regime, the broken hedge narrative argues against pushing for an increase until leadership broadens beyond gold skepticism.

Bullish-leaning analyst bias maintained, but prior veto history and unchanged risk conditions force selectivity. I am only pressing where narrative shift is strongest and macro headwind is least severe.

Summary: The dominant backdrop remains a persistent BEAR regime, so broad conviction increases are still hard to justify. The best thesis-level long remains energy_grid because it has the strongest narrative shift and the most durable cross-theme demand driver via AI power infrastructure, even though risk metrics remain problematic. AI_compute and defense_aerospace are holds: both have credible bull cases, but not enough improvement versus prior veto conditions to warrant another push higher. Real_estate and biotech_health also stay unchanged because constructive narratives are offset by weak quant confirmation and lingering drawdown issues. I recommend cutting quantum and crypto_digital, with crypto the highest-conviction downgrade due to a clear negative narrative shift plus poor macro and quant alignment. Defensive should be held, not raised: macro supports it, but the gold-led hedge narrative is currently broken.

Theme-average volatility is 44.25%, elevated for a 25% max-allocation sleeve in a 100%-probability BEAR regime.

Daily VaR breaches the 3% threshold across much of the basket: NVDA 3.74%, AMD 5.37%, AVGO 4.13%, TSM 3.50%, SMCI 7.54%, ASML 3.72%, AMZN 3.05%.

Drawdowns exceed the theme's 15% limit across nearly the entire basket, including SMCI -66.18%, AMD -31.88%, MSFT -29.55%, META -25.42%, AVGO -25.41%, NVDA -22.32%.

Relative strength is effectively flat to slightly negative at theme average -0.02 vs SPY, which is weak given the risk budget consumed.

Macro headwind is meaningful at -0.55, and momentum data is unavailable, so there is no confirming trend evidence to offset regime risk.

Theme-average relative strength is negative at -2.08 vs SPY while macro impact is a headwind at -0.35.

Daily VaR exceeds 3% for DHI 3.46%, LEN 3.84%, TOL 3.13%, and RKT 5.36%.

Drawdowns are far beyond the theme's 10% limit across most holdings: RKT -41.77%, LEN -36.41%, AMT -27.48%, DHI -27.67%, VMC -22.20%, MLM -20.82%, TOL -20.54%.

Rate sensitivity remains a structural issue with fed funds at 3.64% and weak consumer sentiment, despite housing starts support.

This remains one of the largest unresolved portfolio risks despite prior vetoes; conviction is still high at 7.

Theme-average volatility is 62.35%, extremely high for a moderate-risk theme with 15% max allocation.

Daily VaR breaches are severe: CEG 4.67%, FSLR 5.45%, SMR 9.90%, UEC 7.05%, GEV 4.43%; only NEE is below 3%.

Drawdowns massively exceed the theme's 12% limit: SMR -78.59%, UEC -39.97%, CEG -38.84%, FSLR -33.51%, GEV -20.98%.

Macro impact is only slightly negative (-0.05), but that does not compensate for the realized volatility and drawdown profile.

This is one of the cleaner sleeves, but not risk-free in a BEAR regime.

Theme-average volatility is manageable at 31.24%, yet PLTR materially increases tail risk with 57.44% volatility and 5.69% daily VaR.

PLTR drawdown is -37.81%, far beyond the theme's 10% limit, creating idiosyncratic risk inside an otherwise defensive basket.

Macro impact is mildly negative (-0.10), though relative strength is strong at +14.10 vs SPY and most Sharpe ratios are solid.

HHI concentration is 0.3061, above the 0.25 concentration threshold.

Theme-average volatility is 67.48%, extremely high.

Daily VaR is severe: IONQ 8.18%, RGTI 8.78%, IBM 3.03%; only GOOG is below 3%.

Drawdowns are catastrophic relative to the theme's 25% limit: RGTI -73.59%, IONQ -62.93%, IBM -29.09%.

Theme-average relative strength is -17.65 vs SPY and macro impact is strongly negative at -0.60 in a persistent BEAR regime.

Theme-average relative strength is weak at -12.43 vs SPY with a negative macro impact of -0.25.

Theme-average volatility is 44.48%, high for a moderate-risk theme.

Daily VaR breaches 3% for LLY 3.59%, NVO 4.70%, and CRSP 6.17%.

Drawdowns exceed the theme's 12% limit across the entire basket: NVO -54.93%, CRSP -40.24%, LLY -30.40%, ISRG -24.09%, ABBV -18.79%.

Several key names have poor risk-adjusted returns: NVO Sharpe -1.14, ISRG -0.165, ABBV -0.12.

Theme-average volatility is 71.34%, among the highest in the portfolio.

Daily VaR is extreme across the basket: COIN 6.48%, MSTR 7.61%, MARA 8.31%, XYZ 5.27%, all well above the 3% threshold.

Drawdowns are far beyond the theme's 20% limit: MSTR -76.53%, MARA -70.53%, COIN -66.39%, XYZ -39.48%.

Theme-average relative strength is -9.58 vs SPY and macro impact is strongly negative at -0.70, the worst among all themes.

This is the only sleeve with positive macro support (+0.20) in the current regime.

Theme-average volatility is low at 18.78% and all daily VaR readings are below 3%.

Drawdowns are contained relative to other themes, though several holdings still exceed the theme's strict 5% drawdown limit: PG -19.93%, GLD -18.52%, JNJ -11.75%, KO -11.14%, TLT -9.56.

Theme-average relative strength is positive at +7.88 vs SPY, supporting its role as ballast.

real_estate breaches its 10% max-drawdown limit across most holdings, worst at RKT -41.77%, LEN -36.41%, AMT -27.48%, DHI -27.67%.

energy_grid breaches its 12% max-drawdown limit severely, led by SMR -78.59%, UEC -39.97%, CEG -38.84%, FSLR -33.51%.

quantum breaches its 25% max-drawdown limit with RGTI -73.59%, IONQ -62.93%, and IBM -29.09%.

biotech_health breaches its 12% max-drawdown limit across the full basket, worst at NVO -54.93% and CRSP -40.24%.

Summary: Risk posture remains decisively defensive. This is the fourth straight session where veto conditions persist, and the core triggers have not healed: the portfolio is operating inside a fully persistent BEAR regime while several existing sleeves still combine high conviction with outsized realized drawdowns, elevated volatility, and repeated VaR breaches. The good news is cross-theme correlation is low, so this is not a correlation-cluster problem; it is a sleeve-quality and regime-alignment problem. Defense_aerospace and defensive are the only relatively stable areas, but they do not offset the tail risk embedded in energy_grid, ai_compute, biotech_health, quantum, and crypto_digital. Recommendation: block all conviction increases, raise the defensive sleeve to at least 6, and prioritize reductions/exits in the highest-tail-risk themes before any new risk is added.

Summary: VETOED: Portfolio-level risk remains in veto territory. The market regime is firmly BEAR with 100% confidence, 216-day persistence, and 0.998 BEAR->BEAR continuation probability. Prior veto conditions have not materially improved across sessions: multiple high-conviction themes still show widespread daily VaR breaches above 3% and drawdowns far beyond theme limits, especially energy_grid (conviction 7; 62.35% theme volatility; VaR up to 9.90%; drawdowns to -78.59%), ai_compute (conviction 4; repeated drawdown-limit breaches and several VaR breaches), and real_estate/biotech_health with broad drawdown-limit violations. Quantum and crypto_digital still carry HHI concentration of 0.3061 (>0.25) plus extreme VaR/drawdown profiles. Defensive conviction is only 5 in a persistent BEAR regime; no conviction increases should be approved this session.. Only conviction decreases applied.

Summary: 42 orders, 10 sells, 32 buys, turnover 10.87%, regime sizing 50%


Market regime is firmly BEAR (100% state probability; 216-day persistence; BEAR->BEAR continuation 0.998). Risk appetite is impaired and macro tailwinds are not strong enough to offset recession/slowdown concerns.

Fed policy is still restrictive/neutral-tight: fed funds at 3.64% with inflation cooling but not at target (CPI YoY 2.66%). Higher-for-longer risk remains for rate-sensitive sectors.

Disinflation is present (CPI YoY 2.66%), which is a mild tailwind for duration/rates, but not enough to flip the broader BEAR regime.

Growth looks resilient on the surface (GDP YoY 5.42%), but labor is weakening (UNRATE 4.4% vs 4.0% prior year; jobless claims rising 205k vs 208k prior month—slightly mixed). With VIX elevated (26.78) and BEAR regime, the market is pricing downside risk despite solid headline GDP.

Explanation: BEAR regime + elevated risk (VIX 26.78) is a headwind for high-multiple growth/volatility. While CPI is moderating (2.66% YoY) and the yield curve is not inverted (T10Y2Y spread +0.51%, not inverted), the macro backdrop still supports risk-off discount-rate pressure and tighter financial conditions. Net: negative, but not maximal because inflation is cooling and growth is not collapsing.

Explanation: Rate-sensitive and sentiment-sensitive. Fed funds remain at 3.64% and consumer sentiment is weak (UMCSENT 56.4 vs 71.7 prior year). Even though housing starts are strong (HOUST +9.5% YoY to 1,487k), the BEAR regime and elevated VIX (26.78) typically compress financing/valuation multiples and increase refinancing risk. Net: clear headwind.

Explanation: Macro tailwinds exist: housing starts rising (+9.5% YoY) and GDP growth (5.42% YoY) support construction/infrastructure demand, and CPI is cooling (2.66% YoY) which can reduce inflation-driven cost pressure. However, the BEAR regime and elevated VIX still weigh on risk appetite for infrastructure equities. Net: slightly negative (more resilient than other growth themes, but not a strong tailwind).

Explanation: Defense is relatively macro-insensitive, but BEAR risk-off conditions and uncertainty can pressure equity multiples. With no clear fiscal/geo data provided here, the main macro inputs are VIX elevated (26.78) and weak consumer sentiment, both mildly negative for broad risk assets. Net: near-neutral/slightly negative.

Explanation: High beta/early-stage theme tends to underperform in BEAR regimes with elevated volatility (VIX 26.78). Even with CPI cooling, the market’s risk-off stance dominates. Net: meaningful headwind.

Explanation: Some defensiveness versus pure growth, but still equity-risk sensitive. BEAR regime and elevated VIX (26.78) are headwinds for speculative/long-duration biotech valuations. CPI disinflation (2.66%) is a mild offset, but not enough to turn positive. Net: negative.

Explanation: Crypto typically correlates with liquidity/risk appetite and volatility. With BEAR regime and VIX elevated (26.78), risk-off conditions are strongly negative. No direct liquidity/real-rate relief signal is present (fed funds still 3.64%). Net: strong headwind.

Explanation: Defensive/hedge themes can benefit in BEAR regimes, but the macro data is mixed: unemployment is rising (UNRATE 4.4% vs 4.0% prior year) and consumer sentiment is weak (56.4), which supports demand for defensives. Offsetting this, VIX is elevated (26.78) and the market is still broadly risk-off, so defensives may not fully protect. Net: slightly positive/relative tailwind.

BEAR regime persistence (216 days) suggests risk-off can continue even if CPI is cooling.

Unemployment trend is worsening (UNRATE 4.4% rising), increasing recession/earnings risk for cyclicals and growth.

Elevated VIX (26.78) implies continued volatility/valuation compression for high-duration themes (AI/quantum/crypto).

Housing starts are strong (+9.5% YoY), but that may not translate into equity outperformance if financing conditions tighten or sentiment deteriorates further.

Summary: Macro is consistent with a persistent BEAR risk regime: elevated volatility (VIX 26.78), weak consumer sentiment (UMCSENT 56.4), and rising unemployment (UNRATE 4.4%). Inflation is moderating (CPI 2.66% YoY) and the yield curve is not inverted (T10Y2Y +0.51%), which slightly cushions rate-sensitive and duration assets, but it does not override the market’s risk-off stance. Consequently, the strongest headwinds land on crypto/quant/AI compute, real estate is notably negative despite strong housing starts, energy_grid is relatively more resilient, and defensive is mildly supportive.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman On Stepping Down From Helion's Board Says As Helion And OpenAI Start To Explore Working Together, It Is Difficult For Me To Be On Both Boards

JPMorgan Offers Clients a New Way to Hedge AI Debt Risk - Bloomberg

Broadcom's AI Revenue Just Doubled to $8.4 Billion. Is This the Most Underrated Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock of 2026?

Why ASML Stock Popped Today

Marvell Technology Deepens Its Connectivity Portfolio: What's Ahead?

Pentagon to adopt Palantir's Maven AI system, oil prices fall

Stock Market Today, March 23: Palantir Rises After the Pentagon Designates Maven Program of Record

FAA Clears Higher Takeoff Weight For 787-9 And 787-10

'Boeing's certification logjam begins to break with FAA approval of 787 upgrade' - The Air Current

Shares of homebuilders and housing-related stocks are trading higher as Treasury yields retract following President Trump's suspension of U.S. strikes on Iran's power and energy infrastructure for five days.

Iran War Is Boosting Oil — But A $70 Billion Surge In Battery Stocks Signals A Bigger Shift

Shifting Story For Marathon Digital (MARA) As Bitcoin Weakens And AI Pivot Faces Questions

Crypto Miners Are Losing Nearly $20,000 On Each Bitcoin Produced

MARA Holdings Seeks steadier AI Revenue With Starwood Data Center Pivot

IBM Alliances Highlight Quantum And AI Upside For Undervalued Shares

CRISPR Therapeutics Balances CASGEVY Momentum With Early Pipeline Uncertainty

How Investors May Respond To CRISPR Therapeutics (CRSP) $550 Million Convertible Note Boost To Cash Reserves

What's Going On With Eli Lilly On Monday?

Jim Cramer on Johnson & Johnson: 'It's a Textbook Slowdown Stock'

Barclays Sees Continued Strength in Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Pharma Business

Broadcom's AI revenue doubling to $8.4B reinforces ongoing monetization breadth beyond NVDA.

ASML and Marvell coverage supports continued demand for enabling infrastructure and interconnects.

Helion/OpenAI strategic alignment extends prior 'power is part of the AI stack' continuity.

JPMorgan's AI debt-risk hedge product is an early sign that financing stress is entering the AI buildout conversation.

This is a material evolution of the prior AI narrative, not a fresh reset: the story is broadening from pure growth/capex enthusiasm toward a two-track market framework of 'AI winners with real monetization' versus 'AI buildout financed with rising balance-sheet sensitivity.' The emergence of explicit hedging tools for AI debt risk suggests the market is starting to price the cost of funding the AI boom, not just its revenue upside.

Homebuilders and housing-related stocks rallied as yields retraced after the Iran pause.

Macro relief from lower oil and lower yields modestly improves rate-sensitive construction sentiment.

No strong company-specific fundamental shift in the supplied real-estate news set.

Altman stepping off Helion's board to enable OpenAI-Helion collaboration strengthens strategic AI-power linkage.

Battery-stock strength despite oil volatility supports broader electrification/grid investment appetite.

MARA's data-center pivot also reinforces that power-rich sites are becoming strategic assets beyond utilities.

Pentagon adoption/designation of Palantir's Maven as a program of record is a concrete defense-AI validation event.

Boeing FAA approvals suggest certification bottlenecks may be easing.

De-escalation in Iran reduced the pure geopolitical-risk bid, but defense-specific execution news outweighed that for select names.

This is a genuine story change versus the prior session's de-escalation drag: the defense narrative is rotating from 'owned only as a war hedge' toward 'owned for software-enabled procurement and mission AI adoption.' Palantir/Maven matters because it reframes defense upside around budgeted AI systems rather than just conflict headlines.

IBM alliances in quantum, AI infrastructure, and post-quantum cryptography keep the theme alive through incumbents rather than pure-play speculation.

IBM stock outperformance adds mild confirmation, but there is no breakthrough-level catalyst.

CRISPR/CASGEVY commercialization momentum remains constructive.

Convertible financing improves runway but also reminds the market that funding still matters.

No major new regulatory or clinical inflection in the provided flow.

MARA coverage continues to question whether the AI/data-center pivot can become an operating business.

Reports that miners are losing nearly $20,000 per bitcoin produced deepen pressure on core economics.

Energy-cost sensitivity and weaker bitcoin assumptions continue to undermine the rerating case.

JNJ is being explicitly framed as a slowdown stock again.

Barclays highlighting pharma strength supports quality-defensive earnings resilience.

This is a partial stabilization after the prior session's defensive-hedge narrative break.

AI and energy_grid continuity is strengthening: Helion/OpenAI adds strategic credibility to the idea that dedicated power supply is becoming part of AI infrastructure planning.

A new split is forming inside AI exposure: core enablers with visible monetization (AVGO, ASML, PLTR) are separating from balance-sheet-intensive 'AI pivot' stories like crypto miners.

Geopolitical de-escalation is helping rate-sensitive real_estate while simultaneously weakening the old 'defense as pure conflict hedge' framing; defense winners now need procurement/software specificity.

Defensive leadership is narrowing toward healthcare quality rather than traditional geopolitical hedges.

Summary: Session tone is modestly risk-on after the Iran pause, but the real alpha signal is more selective: the market is rewarding AI narratives with concrete monetization or institutional adoption while becoming more skeptical of capital-intensive, story-driven adjacencies. The two most important narrative developments are: 1) AI financing risk is becoming a recognized market structure issue, and 2) defense is being re-rated through software/procurement adoption rather than just war premium. Energy-grid remains a strong continuity theme via AI-power convergence, while crypto miners continue to lose narrative credibility despite trying to attach themselves to AI infrastructure.

Narrative remains constructively selective: AI monetization breadth is expanding beyond a single winner, with Broadcom, ASML, and defense-linked software adoption reinforcing that real demand persists. The Helion/OpenAI linkage also strengthens the longer-duration thesis that power availability is becoming embedded in the AI stack, which is strategically bullish. Quant confirmation is mixed rather than broken: average relative strength is roughly flat vs SPY, but key leaders like ASML and TSM are still showing strong outperformance and several holdings retain solid Sharpe profiles.

The macro backdrop is still a meaningful headwind for high-multiple growth in a persistent BEAR regime with elevated VIX. More importantly, the narrative shift itself is double-edged: AI financing risk is now explicitly entering the conversation via hedging products for AI debt risk, which can cap enthusiasm for balance-sheet-intensive buildout stories. Prior attempts to lean more bullish were effectively blocked by unchanged risk conditions, and those conditions remain: widespread drawdown breaches, multiple VaR breaches, and very high single-name damage in parts of the basket such as SMCI. With no momentum data and only mixed relative strength, there is not enough fresh improvement to re-propose an increase.

There is a modest tactical relief setup: yields retracing and lower oil after geopolitical de-escalation are helping housing-related equities, while housing starts remain strong and disinflation offers some support to rate-sensitive assets. Quant internals are not uniformly weak either, with REIT-oriented names like O and AMT showing positive relative strength and lower volatility than the more cyclical housing names. That leaves room for stabilization if rates continue easing.

Macro remains clearly negative overall: restrictive Fed policy, weak consumer sentiment, and a persistent BEAR regime are poor conditions for a financing-sensitive theme. The narrative improvement is only tactical and not a true shift, with no strong fundamental reset in the supplied news flow. Quant confirmation is still weak on aggregate, with negative average relative strength, mixed-to-poor Sharpe, and broad drawdown breaches across the basket. Since risk already forced a prior reduction in this theme and those drawdown conditions have not materially improved, there is no basis to push conviction higher.

This remains one of the strongest structural stories in the book. The AI-power convergence continues to deepen, with the Helion/OpenAI development adding strategic credibility to dedicated generation as part of AI infrastructure planning. Battery-stock strength and data-center/power-site scarcity reinforce the broader electrification and grid-capex narrative. Quant support is mixed but contains real leadership: GEV and NEE show strong relative strength, and Sharpe is excellent in parts of the basket, suggesting the theme still has high-quality winners despite the tape.

This is exactly the kind of theme where the bullish thesis is strongest but the risk veto has been most persistent. Macro is still slightly negative in a BEAR regime, and the basket carries severe volatility, elevated VaR, and extreme drawdowns, especially in SMR, UEC, CEG, and FSLR. Critically, a prior proposed increase was explicitly vetoed for this same reason, and the underlying risk metrics have not improved. Given unchanged portfolio-level objections, repeating a +1 would ignore the council feedback. The right stance is to preserve high conviction but not escalate it further this session.

This is the cleanest positive setup in the current slate. The narrative shift is genuine and important: defense is being re-rated from a simple geopolitical hedge into a software-enabled procurement and mission-AI adoption story, with Palantir's Maven designation as a program of record serving as concrete institutional validation. Macro drag is minimal relative to other themes, and quant confirmation is strong: the basket has the best average relative strength among the cyclical/growth-adjacent themes, solid Sharpe across nearly all names, moderate volatility, and comparatively contained drawdowns outside PLTR. This combination of narrative shift plus quant confirmation supports a measured increase even in a BEAR regime.

The main caution is that the macro regime is still risk-off, which can compress multiples broadly, and part of the recent move may already reflect event-driven enthusiasm around Palantir and procurement headlines. PLTR also introduces higher volatility and deeper drawdown than the classic defense primes. In prior sessions, defense was cut when the narrative was deteriorating under de-escalation pressure, so this call depends on accepting that the story has now genuinely changed rather than merely bounced.

There is still a live long-term option value here. IBM alliances and post-quantum/security adjacency keep the theme relevant through a higher-quality incumbent channel rather than pure speculative hope. Some Sharpe readings are respectable, and the current conviction is already low, so the downside from maintaining a small placeholder is limited if a breakthrough narrative emerges later.

Macro is meaningfully negative for early-stage, high-beta themes, and the narrative is only mildly positive with no breakthrough catalyst or narrative shift. Quant confirmation is poor: deeply negative average relative strength, very high volatility, high concentration, extreme VaR, and severe drawdowns in the pure plays. This theme was already reduced across prior sessions for exactly these reasons, and nothing in the current data suggests conditions have improved enough to revisit. Low conviction should remain low.

There is a plausible resilience case: healthcare can act as a relative defensive growth pocket in a slowdown, and the narrative remains modestly constructive around CRISPR commercialization and cash runway extension. The macro headwind is less severe than for pure speculative tech, and the theme still benefits from durable secular drivers like obesity treatment, medtech adoption, and aging demographics. At current conviction, maintaining exposure preserves optionality without overcommitting.

The supplied flow lacks a major regulatory, clinical, or earnings inflection that would justify a stronger stance. Quants are weak: average relative strength is clearly negative, Sharpe is mixed-to-poor, and several names carry large drawdowns and elevated VaR. Prior sessions already saw this theme cut on risk grounds, and those risk conditions remain broadly intact. Without a narrative shift or quant improvement, the evidence supports patience rather than a renewed bullish push.

If liquidity conditions were to improve, this theme could rebound sharply given its high beta and already depressed positioning. The AI/data-center pivot among miners at least shows management teams are searching for alternative monetization paths, and current conviction is already low, limiting absolute portfolio exposure.

This is the weakest theme in the set. Macro is strongly negative in a BEAR regime, and the narrative is decisively deteriorating: miner economics are under pressure, bitcoin-linked operating leverage is hurting, and the supposed AI pivot is increasingly viewed as a financing story rather than a credible operating transition. Quants fully confirm the weakness with negative relative strength, very high volatility, poor Sharpe, high concentration, extreme VaR, and catastrophic drawdowns. This theme was cut in the prior session and the new information only reinforces that decision, so another step down is warranted.

This is the most sensible place to add conviction in a persistent BEAR regime. Macro is the only outright positive theme impact in the set, supported by weakening labor conditions, poor sentiment, and ongoing risk aversion. The narrative has stabilized after the prior break, with healthcare quality names like JNJ being explicitly reframed as slowdown beneficiaries. Quant confirmation is strong: positive average relative strength, the lowest volatility profile in the book, low VaR, manageable drawdowns, and strong Sharpe in JNJ and GLD. Unlike prior sessions, the case is not just abstract hedging demand but specific quality-defensive earnings resilience.

The main risk is that prior attempts to increase defensive exposure were vetoed, so there is some chance the Risk Sentinel again argues that a +1 is insufficient relative to broader portfolio stress or that parts of the basket like TLT and PG still have weak Sharpe. There is also residual narrative damage from the recent hedge breakdown in gold/bonds during geopolitical swings. Still, compared with the rest of the opportunity set, this is the most risk-compatible increase.

Bullish-leaning analyst, but respecting repeated risk vetoes in this persistent BEAR regime by favoring only selective increases where narrative shifts and quant confirmation are strongest.

Summary: Despite my structural bullish bias, the repeated council feedback is clear: broad conviction increases are not appropriate while the market remains locked in a persistent BEAR regime and portfolio-level risk metrics have not materially improved. As a result, I am keeping AI, real estate, energy grid, quantum, and biotech unchanged, specifically avoiding re-proposing increases that were recently vetoed on unchanged drawdown/VaR grounds. The two selective adds are defense_aerospace, where a genuine narrative shift toward software-enabled procurement is backed by strong relative strength and Sharpe, and defensive, where macro alignment and low-risk quant characteristics justify a modest increase. The only outright reduction is crypto_digital, where macro, narrative, and quant signals all remain decisively negative.

Theme macro impact is negative (-0.35) in a persistent BEAR regime with VIX 26.78.

Theme average volatility is 44.25%, elevated for a 25% max-allocation sleeve.

Multiple daily VaR breaches above 3%: NVDA 3.74%, AMD 5.37%, AVGO 4.13%, TSM 3.50%, SMCI 7.54%, ASML 3.72%, AMZN 3.05%.

Drawdowns materially exceed the theme's 15% max-drawdown limit across most holdings: SMCI -66.18%, AMD -31.88%, MSFT -29.55%, META -25.42%, AVGO -25.41%, NVDA -22.32%, TSM -21.96%, AMZN -21.74%, ASML -18.20%, GOOG -15.17%.

Relative strength is effectively flat/negative at theme average -0.02 vs SPY, so macro headwind is not being offset by broad momentum.

Several constituents have weak or negative Sharpe ratios despite high volatility, including SMCI -0.488, MSFT -0.159, META -0.002.

Theme macro impact is strongly negative (-0.55), reflecting restrictive rates, weak sentiment, and BEAR regime pressure on financing-sensitive assets.

Theme average relative strength is negative at -2.08 vs SPY.

Daily VaR breaches above 3% in DHI 3.46%, LEN 3.84%, TOL 3.13%, and RKT 5.36%.

Drawdowns exceed the theme's 10% max-drawdown limit across nearly the entire basket: RKT -41.77%, LEN -36.41%, DHI -27.67%, AMT -27.48%, VMC -22.20%, MLM -20.82%, TOL -20.54%, SHW -19.11%, SPG -17.63%.

Several key names have poor risk-adjusted returns: LEN Sharpe -0.569, SHW -0.424, AMT -0.836.

Housing-start strength is not translating into equity resilience under current financing and sentiment conditions.

This remains one of the largest portfolio risks because conviction is 7 while the theme average volatility is 62.35%, far above a moderate-risk sleeve.

Daily VaR breaches are severe and widespread: CEG 4.67%, FSLR 5.45%, SMR 9.90%, UEC 7.05%, GEV 4.43%; only NEE is below 3%.

Drawdowns massively exceed the theme's 12% max-drawdown limit: SMR -78.59%, UEC -39.97%, CEG -38.84%, FSLR -33.51%, GEV -20.98%.

Macro impact is only slightly negative (-0.15), but that modest resilience is overwhelmed by extreme single-name volatility and drawdown damage.

Theme average relative strength is still slightly negative at -0.64 vs SPY, so the narrative tailwind is not showing up cleanly in aggregate price behavior.

Prior-session veto condition has not improved materially; this theme was explicitly contested last session and remains over-risked for current regime.

This is one of the more resilient sleeves: theme average relative strength is +14.1 vs SPY and most Sharpe ratios are solid.

However, theme average volatility is still 31.24% in a BEAR regime, not truly defensive.

PLTR introduces a speculative risk pocket with 57.44% volatility, 5.69% daily VaR, and -37.81% max drawdown.

Macro impact is slightly negative (-0.05), so even this stronger sleeve is not getting a true macro tailwind.

Conviction remains high at 7, so position sizing discipline matters despite better internals than other growth themes.

Theme concentration HHI is 0.3061, above the 0.25 concentration-risk threshold.

Theme average volatility is 67.48%, extremely high for any sleeve in a BEAR regime.

Theme average relative strength is deeply negative at -17.65 vs SPY.

Daily VaR is extreme: IONQ 8.18%, RGTI 8.78%, IBM 3.03%; only GOOG is below 3%.

Drawdowns are catastrophic relative to the theme's 25% max-drawdown limit: RGTI -73.59%, IONQ -62.93%, IBM -29.09%.

Macro impact is strongly negative (-0.45), and there is no momentum evidence here to offset that headwind.

Theme macro impact is negative (-0.25) and theme average relative strength is weak at -12.43 vs SPY.

Theme average volatility is 44.48%, elevated for a moderate-risk sleeve.

Daily VaR breaches above 3% in LLY 3.59%, NVO 4.70%, and CRSP 6.17%.

Drawdowns exceed the theme's 12% max-drawdown limit across all holdings: NVO -54.93%, CRSP -40.24%, LLY -30.40%, ISRG -24.09%, ABBV -18.79%.

Risk-adjusted returns are poor in several core names: NVO Sharpe -1.14, ISRG -0.165, ABBV -0.12.

This sleeve is not behaving defensively enough to justify current conviction 4 in a persistent BEAR regime.

Macro impact is the most negative in the portfolio at -0.60, reflecting strong sensitivity to liquidity and risk appetite.

Theme average volatility is 71.34%, extremely high.

Daily VaR is extreme across the basket: COIN 6.48%, MSTR 7.61%, MARA 8.31%, XYZ 5.27%.

Drawdowns are far beyond the theme's 20% max-drawdown limit: MSTR -76.53%, MARA -70.53%, COIN -66.39%, XYZ -39.48%.

Theme average relative strength is -9.58 vs SPY and Sharpe ratios are weak/negative in MSTR -0.896 and MARA -0.265.

Prior-session reductions helped conviction, but the underlying risk profile has not improved materially.

This is the cleanest risk offset in the book: theme average relative strength is +7.88 vs SPY, average volatility is only 18.78%, and all daily VaR readings are below 3%.

However, macro support is only mildly positive (+0.10), not a full hedge guarantee.

There are some weak internal spots: PG Sharpe -0.903 and TLT Sharpe -0.71.

Given the persistent BEAR regime, current conviction 5 is not enough to offset the risk carried by high-volatility sleeves elsewhere in the portfolio.

real_estate breaches its 10% max-drawdown limit across nearly the entire basket, worst at RKT -41.77%, LEN -36.41%, DHI -27.67%, AMT -27.48%.

quantum breaches its 25% max-drawdown limit, led by RGTI -73.59%, IONQ -62.93%, IBM -29.09%.

biotech_health breaches its 12% max-drawdown limit across all holdings, worst at NVO -54.93%, CRSP -40.24%, LLY -30.40%.

defensive also exceeds its conservative 5% max-drawdown limit, though losses are materially smaller than risk-on themes: PG -19.93%, GLD -18.52%, JNJ -11.75%, KO -11.14%, TLT -9.56%.

Summary: Risk posture remains decisively defensive. Portfolio-level conditions have not improved versus prior vetoed sessions: the regime is still structurally BEAR, and the highest-risk sleeves continue to show extreme drawdowns, repeated VaR breaches, and elevated volatility. The main problem is not cross-theme correlation—pairwise theme correlations are low—but the coexistence of multiple individually damaged, high-volatility sleeves under a persistent risk-off regime. Energy_grid is the most problematic high-conviction exposure; ai_compute, real_estate, and biotech_health also remain too impaired for increases. Quantum and crypto_digital remain exit-grade risk due to concentration, VaR, and drawdown severity. Defense_aerospace is comparatively resilient and can be held, while defensive should be increased to at least a conviction floor of 6 to improve portfolio ballast. Veto remains in force: block all conviction increases this session.

Summary: VETOED: Portfolio-level risk remains in veto territory. The market regime is BEAR with 100% confidence, 216-day persistence, and 0.998 BEAR->BEAR continuation probability. Prior veto conditions have not improved materially: high-conviction energy_grid (conviction 7) still carries 62.35% theme volatility, multiple daily VaR breaches above 3% up to 9.90% (SMR), and drawdowns as deep as -78.59%; ai_compute still shows widespread drawdown-limit breaches and several VaR breaches; real_estate and biotech_health continue broad drawdown-limit violations; quantum and crypto_digital still have HHI concentration 0.3061 (>0.25) plus extreme VaR/drawdown profiles. Defensive conviction remains only 5, which is insufficient offset in this persistent BEAR regime. No conviction increases should be approved this session.. Only conviction decreases applied.

Summary: 40 orders, 7 sells, 33 buys, turnover 11.49%, regime sizing 50%