Macro tape is risk-off and recession-leaning: market regime is BEAR (88% probability, 20-day persistence). With VIX at 21.04 (elevated) and unemployment rising to 4.3% (from 4.2% prior year), the environment favors capital preservation over growth/cyclical risk.

Fed funds at 3.64% suggests policy is still restrictive/less supportive than in a cutting cycle; without CPI/yield-spread updates, the safest read is “rates remain a headwind” for rate-sensitive and long-duration exposures.

CPI data is missing, so inflation direction is assumed neutral; however, elevated VIX (21.04) implies uncertainty around inflation/rates and keeps risk premia elevated.

GDP growth is still positive (GDP YoY 5.36% as of 2025-10), but labor is softening (UNRATE 4.3%) and the BEAR regime implies growth risk is skewed to the downside near term.

Explanation: BEAR regime and elevated VIX (21.04) are headwinds for high-multiple growth, but the AI narrative can partially offset via durable capex demand; net is mildly negative given risk-off conditions.

Explanation: Rate-sensitive theme: with Fed funds at 3.64% and risk-off sentiment, housing/credit conditions are likely tighter; missing housing starts data prevents precision, but macro direction is clearly unfavorable.

Explanation: Energy/grid is partly inflation- and capex-supported, but BEAR risk-off plus elevated volatility typically compresses risk appetite; prior session drawdown breaches also align with a near-term headwind.

Explanation: Defense is relatively insulated from the business cycle, but BEAR tape and reduced “war-premium” momentum weaken near-term sentiment; still less negative than pure growth/cyclical themes.

Explanation: High-volatility, early-stage theme is strongly hurt in BEAR regimes; elevated VIX (21.04) and prior session narrative demotion/funding reallocation risk make the macro tailwind absent.

Explanation: Health/biotech has some defensive characteristics, but the contested/veto context suggests near-term risk appetite is insufficient; macro is mildly negative overall given BEAR conditions.

Explanation: Crypto is liquidity/risk-appetite sensitive; BEAR regime with VIX at 21.04 is a clear headwind, and missing liquidity/claims data doesn’t justify a bullish reversal.

Explanation: Defensive/hedge themes benefit from risk-off positioning in a BEAR regime; despite restrictive rates, the elevated VIX environment supports demand for stability.

VIX at 21.04 signals elevated risk premia; in a BEAR regime this can further compress high-duration/growth valuations (ai_compute, quantum, crypto_digital).

Labor softening risk: UNRATE at 4.3% (up from 4.2% prior year) increases recession probability, which typically pressures rate-sensitive and cyclical exposures (real_estate, energy_grid).

Policy/discount-rate risk: Fed funds at 3.64% without evidence of easing (CPI/yield spread missing) keeps discount rates elevated, sustaining headwinds for long-duration themes (quantum, ai_compute).

Summary: The macro environment is firmly risk-off (BEAR regime, VIX 21.04) with slightly weakening labor conditions (UNRATE 4.3%). Net: the strongest headwinds concentrate in high-volatility growth/early-stage themes (crypto_digital, quantum) and rate-sensitive real estate, while defensive/hedge themes show the only modest tailwind.

Google and Intel deepen AI infrastructure partnership

Intel Stock Rises on Massive Google Deal

Amazon Plays Both Sides: Competing — And Partnering — With Nvidia, AMD And Intel

CoreWeave Advances 4% as Meta Commits $21 Billion Through 2032: The AI Cloud King Is Stacking Contracts

Chip Stocks Are Rocking As Investors Come Knocking

SaaS Stock Meltdown: ServiceNow, Salesforce, Cloudflare, Snowflake Hit Hard

IGV ETF Hit By Palantir Rout As Anthropic Reshapes Enterprise AI Spending

Microsoft's 'Copilot Code Red': CEO Nadella Deploys Emergency Overhaul To Crush AI Rivals

Shares of cybersecurity-related companies are trading lower following reports suggesting that OpenAI is close to finalizing a product with cybersecurity capabilities.

Builder Stocks Jump on Cease-Fire. A Tough Year Could Be Turning Around.

Toll Brothers Stock Could Lead Homebuilder Rebound as Housing Stabilizes

D R Horton Faces Plumbing Claims As Investors Weigh Valuation And Risks

ENTRA1 Lawsuits And Commercialization Concerns Might Change The Case For Investing In NuScale Power (SMR)

Why The NuScale Power (SMR) Investment Narrative Is Shifting As Analysts Reset Expectations

3 Energy Stocks to Buy as AI Power Demand Surges—and 2 to Avoid

Defense Stocks Mixed After Iran Cease-Fire. Who’s Winning and Who’s Losing.

Lockheed Martin Gains As $2.9 Billion AIM-260 Funding Proposed For 2027

How Defense Tech Investors Are Using SHLD to Capture 21st Century Warfare Spending

Quantum Computing ETFs Are Dying. Pivot to These 3 AI ETFs

Chip Stocks Are at Record Highs. Why That Feels a ‘Wee Bit’ Much.

CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) is Attracting Investor Attention: Here is What You Should Know

This Biotech Has a Pipeline That Could Redefine Its Entire Therapeutic Area

Renewed Bitcoin Buys Funded By Stretch Preferred Stock Could Be A Game Changer For Strategy (MSTR)

The New York Times may have found bitcoin founder Satoshi Nakamoto. Here's what you need to know.

Bitmine Joins NYSE With $4 Billion Buyback But Stock Slips 2% On Debut Day

Buy Johnson & Johnson Stock Ahead of Earnings, Analyst Says. The Gains Can Continue.

Johnson & Johnson PFA Launch Puts VARIPULSE Pro And Valuation In Focus

This Utility Could Be the Next Dividend Aristocrat. It May Return 10% This Year.

Biopharma Stocks Largely Exempt From Pharma Tariffs, BofA Says

March Inflation Set For Biggest Jump Since June 2022 — When CPI Spikes, These Stocks Fall

America's Debt Interest Bill Tops Half A Trillion As Fiscal Burden Grows

Google and Intel deepen AI infrastructure partnership (TechCrunch)

Amazon Plays Both Sides: Competing — And Partnering — With Nvidia, AMD And Intel (Benzinga)

CoreWeave Advances 4% as Meta Commits $21 Billion Through 2032 (24/7 Wall St.)

SaaS Stock Meltdown: ServiceNow, Salesforce, Cloudflare, Snowflake Hit Hard (Benzinga)

Continuation and material evolution of the prior AI shift: the story is now bifurcating more sharply between infrastructure beneficiaries and application/software losers. Capital is still flowing aggressively into chips, cloud capacity, and custom silicon partnerships, but enterprise software is being repriced as AI buyers consolidate spend toward model/inference infrastructure and fewer strategic platforms. Bullish for compute, bearish for broad SaaS.

Builder Stocks Jump on Cease-Fire. A Tough Year Could Be Turning Around. (Barrons.com)

Toll Brothers Stock Could Lead Homebuilder Rebound as Housing Stabilizes (Barrons.com)

March Inflation Set For Biggest Jump Since June 2022 — When CPI Spikes, These Stocks Fall (Benzinga)

A modest new shift is emerging: housing is being reframed from a pure rate victim to a geopolitical/rates relief trade. The cease-fire-driven drop in yields is giving builders narrative oxygen, though this remains fragile because inflation and fiscal-burden headlines can quickly reverse the rate relief.

ENTRA1 Lawsuits And Commercialization Concerns Might Change The Case For Investing In NuScale Power (SMR) (Simply Wall St.)

Why The NuScale Power (SMR) Investment Narrative Is Shifting As Analysts Reset Expectations (Simply Wall St.)

3 Energy Stocks to Buy as AI Power Demand Surges—and 2 to Avoid (MarketBeat)

Defense Stocks Mixed After Iran Cease-Fire. Who’s Winning and Who’s Losing. (Barrons.com)

Lockheed Martin Gains As $2.9 Billion AIM-260 Funding Proposed For 2027 (GuruFocus.com)

IGV ETF Hit By Palantir Rout As Anthropic Reshapes Enterprise AI Spending (Benzinga)

Quantum Computing ETFs Are Dying. Pivot to These 3 AI ETFs (24/7 Wall St.)

Chip Stocks Are at Record Highs. Why That Feels a ‘Wee Bit’ Much. (Barrons.com)

CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) is Attracting Investor Attention: Here is What You Should Know (Zacks)

This Biotech Has a Pipeline That Could Redefine Its Entire Therapeutic Area (Motley Fool)

Biopharma Stocks Largely Exempt From Pharma Tariffs, BofA Says (MT Newswires)

Renewed Bitcoin Buys Funded By Stretch Preferred Stock Could Be A Game Changer For Strategy (MSTR) (Simply Wall St.)

The New York Times may have found bitcoin founder Satoshi Nakamoto. Here's what you need to know. (Yahoo Finance)

Bitmine Joins NYSE With $4 Billion Buyback But Stock Slips 2% On Debut Day (Benzinga)

Buy Johnson & Johnson Stock Ahead of Earnings, Analyst Says. The Gains Can Continue. (Barrons.com)

Johnson & Johnson PFA Launch Puts VARIPULSE Pro And Valuation In Focus (Simply Wall St.)

This Utility Could Be the Next Dividend Aristocrat. It May Return 10% This Year. (Barrons.com)

AI capital is concentrating into compute infrastructure while broad SaaS and some cyber names are being treated as funding sources; this benefits ai_compute and pressures software-adjacent parts of defense_aerospace via PLTR-style multiple compression.

Cease-fire/rates relief is helping both real_estate and reducing the near-term war premium in defense_aerospace, showing one geopolitical input creating opposite effects across cyclical domestic housing and defense.

AI power-demand logic still supports energy_grid at the thematic level, but single-name commercialization risk in SMR is overwhelming the macro tailwind; the market is rewarding picks-and-shovels power exposure more than speculative reactor timelines.

Defensive quality is improving through idiosyncratic growth optionality (JNJ devices, utility income durability), not just fear-based rotation.

Summary: Narrative tone is near-neutral with a slight defensive tilt. The most important evolving story is inside AI: demand is not fading, but the market is becoming much more selective, rewarding chips, cloud capacity, and custom infrastructure deals while punishing broad SaaS and some cyber/software exposures. That is a continuation of the earlier selective-winners shift, now sharper and more actionable. A smaller fresh shift is appearing in housing, where cease-fire-driven yield relief is allowing builders to be discussed as rebound candidates rather than only rate casualties. Quantum remains in narrative demotion versus AI and should not be re-upgraded; defense still faces a weaker near-term urgency premium despite supportive budget headlines. Defensives keep improving on quality, especially JNJ, which continues to look more like a growth-capable shelter than a pure hiding place.

AI infrastructure demand remains real and increasingly selective: Google-Intel, Meta-CoreWeave, and broader chip/cloud capex headlines support the compute layer even in a weak tape. Quant is mixed but not broken, with solid 6m theme momentum (+10.93%), slightly positive average relative strength, and strong leadership from TSM/ASML/AMD. The narrative shift still favors infrastructure winners over software losers, which keeps the core thesis alive.

This exact theme was recently contested and vetoed for increase, and the blocking conditions have not improved enough. Macro is still mildly negative in a firm BEAR regime, 3m momentum has rolled over (-2.19%), and the latest narrative shift includes a negative repricing in SaaS/software adjacent names. Internally, the basket is bifurcated with clear losers (SMCI, MSFT, AMZN, META on recent momentum), so broad conviction expansion is not yet justified.

There is a genuine small narrative shift: housing is no longer framed only as a rate victim, and cease-fire/yield-relief headlines are giving builders rebound optionality. Some subsectors are confirming that turn, with TOL, O, SPG, and AMT showing decent 3m action and positive relative strength. From a low base conviction, the downside from holding steady is limited if the rates-relief trade broadens.

Macro remains clearly unfavorable for rate-sensitive exposure, with restrictive policy and a recession-leaning BEAR regime. Quant confirmation is insufficient: theme-average 6m momentum is -7.51%, 3m is still negative, and average relative strength vs SPY is -1.64. The narrative shift is fragile and explicitly vulnerable to inflation/rates reversal, so I would not press for an upgrade yet.

The long-duration structural story still exists: AI power demand, grid modernization, and utility-quality exposure remain valid, with NEE and GEV showing strong momentum and excellent Sharpe. There are still pockets of real strength inside the sleeve, especially among less speculative grid/power names. If the theme were cleaner, the secular setup would be attractive.

This is one of the clearest near-term downgrades. Macro is negative, narrative tone is negative, and the sleeve still carries an unresolved breach-level risk problem centered on SMR. Quant is too unstable for a BEAR regime: 3m momentum is negative, average relative strength is negative, volatility is very high (59.95), concentration is elevated, and SMR portfolio drawdown has worsened to -20.34%, still far beyond prior veto thresholds. Given repeated prior-session risk flags, I should not repeat a bullish ask here.

This remains one of the best-looking quant sleeves in the book despite the macro tape: 6m momentum (+24.14%), 3m momentum (+18.49%), positive relative strength, solid Sharpe, and generally manageable volatility outside PLTR. Budget/funding support remains intact, and traditional primes like LMT, RTX, NOC, and LHX are acting well. Relative to other cyclical/growth themes, defense is still fundamentally resilient.

The near-term narrative has softened as cease-fire headlines reduce urgency and the war-premium bid fades. More importantly, prior veto conditions remain unresolved because PLTR still shows a severe portfolio drawdown (-19.68%), well beyond the previously cited theme limit. That unresolved single-name stress prevents me from recommending an increase even though the broader sleeve is strong.

If one wanted to stretch for upside, the only bull argument is that the theme is already washed out and any breakthrough headline could create explosive reflexive upside from depressed positioning. GOOG provides one stabilizing anchor, and 6m average momentum is not deeply negative because of that ballast.

This remains a clean negative. Macro is strongly adverse, narrative demotion is severe, and the market is explicitly reallocating from quantum into AI. Quant confirmation is poor across every important dimension: 3m momentum is -24.18%, relative strength is -26.97, volatility is extreme, HHI is too high at 0.3061, VaR is far above tolerable levels, and entry-point drawdowns remain deep. Prior sessions repeatedly cut this theme and nothing has improved enough to revisit that stance.

This theme has mild defensive qualities and a slightly positive narrative backdrop, helped by pipeline optionality and tariff-exemption headlines. At the single-name level, LLY and ABBV provide some quality ballast, and portfolio drawdowns are not showing the same breach-level stress seen in more speculative sleeves. From a low conviction base, it remains a plausible future upgrade candidate if relative strength improves.

I proposed bullishness here before and it was vetoed, and the evidence still does not clear the bar. Macro is only mildly negative, but quant is weak: 3m momentum is -7.47%, average relative strength is a poor -15.1, and the sleeve is still internally uneven with NVO and ISRG dragging. Without a narrative shift or stronger price confirmation, staying neutral is the disciplined call.

The only constructive angle is that narrative tone is not outright collapsing and crypto can reverse violently if liquidity sentiment turns. There are isolated idiosyncratic catalysts around MSTR and market structure, and XYZ has shown some 3m resilience.

Macro is the worst fit here: BEAR regime, elevated VIX, and no evidence of improving liquidity. Quant is decisively negative with 6m momentum at -38.88%, 3m at -18.59%, relative strength at -16.88, volatility at 68.04, HHI at 0.3061, and extreme VaR across the sleeve. Prior sessions repeatedly downgraded this theme and the risk profile remains incompatible with any bullish lean.

This is still the cleanest long in the book on a relative basis. Macro is the only positive theme impact, narrative is constructive, and quant is excellent: strong 6m/3m momentum, positive relative strength, low volatility, strong Sharpe in JNJ/GLD, and minimal portfolio drawdown. The quality of the narrative has improved beyond simple fear rotation, with JNJ and utilities offering growth-capable defense.

I remain bullish on the sleeve, but prior attempts to increase were vetoed at the portfolio level, not because the theme was weak. With conviction already at 9, the incremental benefit of pushing to 10 is small while the broader book still has unresolved breach-level risks elsewhere. Best course is to keep this as the anchor rather than spend political capital on another increase request.

Bullish-leaning framework (0.55) applied, but prior veto history and unresolved drawdown breaches force restraint; I looked for selective upgrades, yet only defensives clearly qualify and they are already near max conviction.

Summary: In this BEAR, risk-off tape, I am resisting the urge to add risk where prior veto conditions remain unresolved. The strongest positive thesis remains defensive, but at conviction 9 it is already fully recognized. AI compute still has a live selective-winners narrative, yet not enough improvement versus the last veto to justify another increase request. I recommend active downgrades only in energy_grid, quantum, and crypto_digital, where macro headwinds, weak or negative narratives, and unresolved risk metrics align. Defense stays neutral despite strong price action because PLTR drawdown still blocks an upgrade; biotech and real estate also stay unchanged due to insufficient confirmation.

Macro headwind: BEAR regime with 88% probability and elevated VIX 21.04 is unfavorable for long-duration growth exposure.

Theme 3m momentum is negative at -2.19%, showing weakening near-term tape despite 6m gains.

Theme average volatility is 41.01%, elevated for a 25% max-allocation sleeve.

Multiple constituents exceed 3% daily VaR threshold: NVDA -3.54%, AMD -4.56%, AVGO -3.84%, TSM -3.12%, SMCI -6.53%, ASML -3.73%.

Weak internal breadth: SMCI portfolio drawdown -3.58% and MSFT -2.75%, with negative Sharpe on SMCI (-0.263) and MSFT (-0.284).

Strong macro headwind: theme impact score -0.55, with restrictive Fed stance and recession-leaning BEAR regime directly pressuring rate-sensitive real estate exposure.

Theme momentum remains weak: 6m average -7.51%, 3m average -2.16%, and relative strength vs SPY is -1.64.

Daily VaR breaches 3% threshold in DHI -3.36%, LEN -3.71%, and RKT -5.04%.

Entry-point losses are building in weaker names: LEN portfolio drawdown -4.81%, RKT -2.20%.

Several constituents have poor risk-adjusted returns: LEN Sharpe -0.502, AMT -0.676, SHW -0.088.

Live drawdown breach remains unresolved: SMR portfolio drawdown is -20.34%, exceeding the theme max-drawdown limit of 12% by 8.34 percentage points.

Theme average volatility is 59.95%, very high for a moderate-risk theme.

Multiple severe VaR breaches: CEG -4.55%, FSLR -5.08%, SMR -9.78%, UEC -7.05%, GEV -4.29%.

Near-term momentum is deteriorating: theme 3m average -3.93%, with SMR -44.20% and FSLR -22.70% over 3m.

Historical drawdown profile is poor in key names: SMR max drawdown -82.86%, UEC -39.97%, CEG -38.84%, FSLR -35.10%.

Prior-session breach has worsened rather than healed: SMR moved from roughly -19.96% to -20.34%.

Live drawdown breach remains unresolved: PLTR portfolio drawdown is -19.68%, exceeding the theme max-drawdown limit of 10% by 9.68 percentage points.

PLTR also carries extreme daily VaR of -5.82%, well above the 3% threshold.

Macro is less negative than other cyclicals, but prior narrative support has weakened and the sleeve still contains a high-beta software component.

Theme concentration is not extreme (HHI 0.1834), but conviction is already high at 5 with max allocation 12%, limiting room for error while a breach is active.

Prior veto condition remains effectively unchanged: PLTR drawdown is still near -20%, not meaningfully repaired from prior sessions.

Concentration risk is excessive: HHI 0.3061 exceeds the 0.25 threshold.

Theme average volatility is 64.98%, extremely high.

Theme 3m momentum is deeply negative at -24.18%, and relative strength vs SPY is -26.97.

Extreme daily VaR across the sleeve: IONQ -7.99%, RGTI -8.78%, IBM -3.03%.

Deep entry-point losses remain active: IONQ portfolio drawdown -15.75%, RGTI -10.33%, IBM -5.00%.

Historical drawdown profile is severe: IONQ max drawdown -67.61%, RGTI -77.10%.

Macro headwind is strong (impact score -0.60) and aligns with weak momentum, creating a double flag in a persistent BEAR regime.

Theme 3m momentum is negative at -7.47% and relative strength vs SPY is -15.10%, indicating weak participation even in a partially defensive sector.

Theme average volatility is 42.65%, elevated for a moderate-risk sleeve.

Daily VaR breaches 3% threshold in LLY -3.52%, NVO -4.37%, and CRSP -5.87%.

Risk-adjusted returns are weak in key names: NVO Sharpe -0.856 and ISRG -0.499.

Internal dispersion is high, with NVO 6m momentum -28.69% and 3m -17.21%, while CRSP remains high-volatility at 62.76%.

Theme average volatility is 68.04%, extremely high.

Momentum is decisively negative: 6m average -38.88%, 3m average -18.59%, relative strength vs SPY -16.88.

Every constituent breaches the 3% daily VaR threshold: COIN -6.48%, MSTR -7.08%, MARA -7.71%, XYZ -5.16%.

Deep entry-point losses remain active: COIN portfolio drawdown -15.84%, MSTR -7.80%, XYZ -0.87%.

Historical drawdowns are severe: COIN -66.39%, MSTR -76.53%, MARA -70.53%, XYZ -39.48%.

Macro headwind is strongest here (impact score -0.70) in a BEAR regime with elevated VIX, making this the least defensible risk sleeve.

This is the only theme with positive macro impact (+0.20) in the current BEAR regime.

Theme momentum is strong: 6m average 18.46%, 3m average 13.79%, relative strength vs SPY 9.13.

Theme average volatility is low at 17.86%, and no constituent breaches the 3% daily VaR threshold.

Minor watch item: TLT and PG have negative Sharpe ratios (-0.633 and -0.745), but portfolio drawdowns remain contained.

Energy_grid breach: SMR portfolio drawdown is -20.34%, exceeding theme max-drawdown limit of 12%.

Defense_aerospace breach: PLTR portfolio drawdown is -19.68%, exceeding theme max-drawdown limit of 10%.

Quantum stress remains active from entry: IONQ -15.75%, RGTI -10.33%, IBM -5.00%.

Crypto stress remains active from entry: COIN -15.84%, MSTR -7.80%.

Summary: Risk posture remains decisively defensive. This is the fourth straight session with unresolved veto conditions, and the key triggers have not improved enough to reopen risk. Portfolio-level danger is being driven by three factors: persistent BEAR regime conditions, active realized drawdown breaches in energy_grid and defense_aerospace, and concentrated speculative sleeves in quantum and crypto_digital with extreme VaR and poor momentum. Correlation is not the problem here; idiosyncratic sleeve risk is. No conviction increases should be approved. Preferred actions are to reduce energy_grid and defense_aerospace until drawdown breaches are repaired, and continue exiting or minimizing quantum and crypto_digital. Maintain at least a 3 conviction floor in defensive, with current high defensive posture still justified.

Summary: VETOED: Portfolio-level risk remains in veto territory. The market regime is BEAR with 88% confidence, 20-day persistence, and a 0.98 BEAR->BEAR continuation probability. Prior veto conditions have not been resolved: live realized drawdown breaches remain active in energy_grid (SMR portfolio drawdown -20.34% vs theme max-drawdown limit 12%) and defense_aerospace (PLTR -19.68% vs 10%). Concentration risk remains excessive in quantum and crypto_digital (HHI 0.3061 > 0.25 in both), and both sleeves still carry extreme daily VaR far above the 3% threshold (quantum: RGTI -8.78%, IONQ -7.99%, IBM -3.03%; crypto_digital: MARA -7.71%, MSTR -7.08%, COIN -6.48%, XYZ -5.16%). In a persistent BEAR regime, unresolved breach-level drawdowns plus concentrated high-VaR speculative sleeves make any conviction increase imprudent this session.. Only conviction decreases applied.

Summary: 23 orders, 12 sells, 11 buys, turnover 7.91%, regime sizing 50%


HMM market regime is firmly BEAR (state prob BEAR 0.881) with high confidence (88.1%) and 20-day persistence (BEAR->BEAR 0.98). Macro risk is consistent with a risk-off tape: VIX is elevated at 21.04 (not extreme), consumer sentiment is below prior-year levels (UMCSENT 56.6 vs 64.7), and labor/housing are mixed (UNRATE 4.3 rising; housing starts up YoY).

Fed policy appears restrictive/holding steady: fed funds at 3.64% with no easing signal provided, and the yield curve is not inverted (10Y-2Y spread +0.51%), reducing recession-signal strength versus an inversion regime. However, BEAR risk persists, implying markets are discounting slower growth and/or tightening financial conditions despite the non-inverted curve.

CPI data is missing, so inflation direction cannot be confirmed. Given the BEAR regime and elevated VIX, the working assumption is that inflation risk is not clearly resolved; defaulting to a neutral-to-slightly negative inflation outlook for rate-sensitive themes.

Growth is mixed but not collapsing: GDP YoY is 5.36% (strong), unemployment is deteriorating (UNRATE 4.3 vs 4.2 prior year), jobless claims are rising (219k vs 213k prior month), and ISM manufacturing employment is strong (MANEMP 12591). Net: growth is still positive, but labor momentum is weakening—consistent with a late-cycle BEAR backdrop rather than a clean recession call.

Explanation: BEAR regime and elevated VIX (21.04) are headwinds for risk assets, but GDP strength (5.36%) and ongoing manufacturing employment strength (MANEMP 12591) provide some support to AI infrastructure demand.

Explanation: Rate sensitivity is a key channel, and the BEAR tape plus rising labor stress (UNRATE 4.3; claims 219k rising) pressures housing demand sentiment. Housing starts are up YoY (+9.5%), which partially offsets the headwind.

Explanation: Energy/grid benefits from infrastructure and inflation expectations, but risk-off conditions (BEAR regime, VIX 21.04) typically compress multiples. Manufacturing employment strength and housing activity help the demand narrative, keeping the impact mildly negative rather than strongly bearish.

Explanation: Defense is relatively macro-insensitive, but BEAR conditions and risk-off positioning reduce appetite for equities broadly. The provided prior-session narrative suggests near-term momentum has weakened, which aligns with a modest headwind.

Explanation: Quantum is high-beta/high-duration and tends to underperform in BEAR regimes with elevated volatility (VIX 21.04). Even with solid GDP, weakening labor pulse (claims rising) and risk-off discounting make the macro tailwind unlikely.

Explanation: Biotech has some defensiveness via healthcare demand, but it still trades as growth/innovation risk in BEAR markets. With no CPI data and only mild labor deterioration, the macro impact is slightly negative rather than severe.

Explanation: Crypto is highly sensitive to liquidity and risk appetite; BEAR regime plus elevated VIX (21.04) is a direct headwind. Rising unemployment/claims (UNRATE 4.3; ICSA 219k rising) further supports a risk-off discount.

Explanation: Defensive/hedge themes benefit from risk-off conditions: BEAR regime and elevated VIX support demand for stability. However, unemployment is only moderately worse and GDP remains strong, limiting upside (impact stays mildly positive).

VIX at 21.04 indicates elevated risk-off conditions; if VIX pushes toward >30, high-beta themes (quantum, crypto_digital) could face sharper drawdowns.

Labor momentum is weakening: UNRATE 4.3 (up vs 4.2 prior year) and jobless claims rising to 219k (from 213k prior month), increasing the probability that growth cools faster than GDP YoY suggests.

Inflation direction is unknown (CPI missing); if CPI re-accelerates, rate-sensitive themes (real_estate) could be hit despite the non-inverted curve (T10Y2Y +0.51%).

Summary: Macro backdrop is BEAR with elevated volatility (VIX 21.04) and weakening labor momentum (UNRATE 4.3; claims 219k rising), even though GDP growth remains strong (5.36%) and the yield curve is not inverted (T10Y-2Y +0.51%). Net: risk-on innovation themes (quantum, crypto_digital, and to a lesser extent ai_compute) face the largest macro headwinds, while defensive/hedge is the relative beneficiary; real_estate is pressured by the BEAR tape and labor stress but partially supported by higher housing starts (+9.5% YoY).

TSMC Q1 2026 earnings: Record revenue on strong AI chip demand

TSMC Stock Rises as Chip Sales Jump. The Iran War Hasn’t Hit AI Chip Demand.

AI Chips Are A Looming Battlefield In U.S.-China Trade. What Investors Should Know.

'OpenAI Tells Investors It Has Computing Advantage Over Anthropic' - Bloomberg

Move Over Nvidia: Citron Sees 28% Upside In Amazon's Hidden Trillion-Dollar Chip Empire

IGV ETF Hit By Palantir Rout As Anthropic Reshapes Enterprise AI Spending

SaaS Stock Meltdown: ServiceNow, Salesforce, Cloudflare, Snowflake Hit Hard

GE Vernova Is In the Right Place at the Right Time

GE Vernova Surges 12.8% in a Month: Time to Hold or Fold the Stock?

GE Vernova Extends Nuclear Ambitions In Europe With New SMR Services Deal

GE Vernova’s Hungary MoU Adds To Europe Growth And Valuation Debate

Middle East Ceasefire Eases Tensions, but Defense Stocks Stay in Focus – 2 Picks Analysts Like

Defense Stocks Fall. Why They Haven’t Had an Iran War Surge and What Can Drive Gains.

8 Big Winners From Trump’s Historic $1.5 Trillion Defense Request

IonQ, D-Wave, Rigetti stocks tumble as Mizuho slashes price targets by 25%

Rigetti Is Growing Sales of Quantum Computers. That’s Good for the Stock.

AI-Quantum Supercycle: 4 Stocks to Watch in April With 50%+ Upside

IonQ Strengthens Position With Strategic Government Contracts

Toll Brothers Stock Could Lead Homebuilder Rebound as Housing Stabilizes

Lennar Has a Strong Foundation. The Stock Can Build on It.

Coinbase stock hit with analyst downgrade on crypto market's weak start to 2026

Morgan Stanley Enters Crypto ETP Market With Bitcoin Trust

Bitcoin Price Falls. Why Faltering Iran Cease-Fire Could Crush Cryptos.

Biopharma Stocks Largely Exempt From Pharma Tariffs, BofA Says

Johnson & Johnson PFA Launch Puts VARIPULSE Pro And Valuation In Focus

Study Showing 50% Drop In COVID ER Visits Thanks To The Vaccine Put On Hold By CDC: Report

This Utility Could Be the Next Dividend Aristocrat. It May Return 10% This Year.

TSMC Q1 2026 earnings: Record revenue on strong AI chip demand (Quartz)

TSMC Stock Rises as Chip Sales Jump. The Iran War Hasn’t Hit AI Chip Demand. (Barrons.com)

AI Chips Are A Looming Battlefield In U.S.-China Trade. What Investors Should Know. (Investor's Business Daily)

'OpenAI Tells Investors It Has Computing Advantage Over Anthropic' - Bloomberg (Benzinga Newsdesk)

Material evolution of the prior AI story is strengthening, not reversing: compute demand remains robust despite war noise, but the market narrative is hardening around compute scarcity and strategic control. The story is moving from broad AI enthusiasm toward a narrower frame: whoever owns chips, custom silicon, and capacity wins; software layers without clear differentiation are being repriced.

Toll Brothers Stock Could Lead Homebuilder Rebound as Housing Stabilizes (Barrons.com)

Lennar Has a Strong Foundation. The Stock Can Build on It. (Barrons.com)

GE Vernova Extends Nuclear Ambitions In Europe With New SMR Services Deal (Simply Wall St.)

GE Vernova’s Hungary MoU Adds To Europe Growth And Valuation Debate (Simply Wall St.)

GE Vernova Surges 12.8% in a Month: Time to Hold or Fold the Stock? (Zacks)

GE Vernova Is In the Right Place at the Right Time (Motley Fool)

Defense Stocks Fall. Why They Haven’t Had an Iran War Surge and What Can Drive Gains. (Barrons.com)

Middle East Ceasefire Eases Tensions, but Defense Stocks Stay in Focus – 2 Picks Analysts Like (TipRanks)

8 Big Winners From Trump’s Historic $1.5 Trillion Defense Request (Barrons.com)

IonQ, D-Wave, Rigetti stocks tumble as Mizuho slashes price targets by 25% (GuruFocus.com)

Rigetti Is Growing Sales of Quantum Computers. That’s Good for the Stock. (Barrons.com)

IonQ Strengthens Position With Strategic Government Contracts (Zacks)

Biopharma Stocks Largely Exempt From Pharma Tariffs, BofA Says (MT Newswires)

Johnson & Johnson PFA Launch Puts VARIPULSE Pro And Valuation In Focus (Simply Wall St.)

Study Showing 50% Drop In COVID ER Visits Thanks To The Vaccine Put On Hold By CDC: Report (Benzinga)

Morgan Stanley Enters Crypto ETP Market With Bitcoin Trust (CryptoProwl)

Coinbase stock hit with analyst downgrade on crypto market's weak start to 2026 (Yahoo Finance)

Bitcoin Price Falls. Why Faltering Iran Cease-Fire Could Crush Cryptos. (Barrons.com)

A subtle but real story change is emerging: institutionalization of bitcoin exposure is continuing even while crypto equities like Coinbase are being downgraded. The narrative is separating asset adoption from equity monetization, which is constructive for bitcoin access products but less so for legacy crypto-beta stocks.

This Utility Could Be the Next Dividend Aristocrat. It May Return 10% This Year. (Barrons.com)

AI capex strength is spilling into energy_grid: persistent chip demand and compute competition reinforce the need for power generation, nuclear services, and grid buildout.

The prior AI bifurcation is intensifying: infrastructure/compute winners are strengthening while enterprise software is being repriced lower, a cross-domain signal that benefits ai_compute but pressures adjacent software-heavy exposures.

Geopolitical de-escalation is hurting defense’s near-term urgency while simultaneously supporting risk appetite in housing and parts of crypto; however, those relief effects remain fragile.

Institutional product expansion in crypto suggests a split between adoption of digital assets and profitability of crypto intermediaries, echoing AI’s own split between platform adoption and value capture.

Summary: Narrative tone is near-neutral with a slight positive offset, but leadership is narrow. The strongest story remains AI infrastructure: TSMC’s results confirm that real compute demand is still overpowering macro and war noise, while new headlines around OpenAI/Amazon/custom silicon reinforce that control of compute is becoming the market’s central AI bottleneck. That is a continuation and strengthening of yesterday’s selective-winners shift, not a fresh broadening. Energy/grid remains a secondary beneficiary of that same capex story. Defense continues to fade from a war-premium trade into a slower budget-support story, consistent with prior sessions. Quantum remains narratively demoted despite isolated commercialization wins. The other notable shift is in crypto: institutional access keeps improving, but the market is increasingly distinguishing bitcoin adoption from the earnings power of crypto equities like Coinbase.

Narrative remains the strongest among growth themes: AI infrastructure demand is still validating through TSMC and the story is sharpening toward scarce compute, custom silicon, and capacity ownership. Quant support is mixed but not broken, with positive 6m theme momentum (+10.93%), slightly positive relative strength (+1.68), and strong leadership from TSM/ASML/AMD offsetting weakness in software-adjacent names. This is exactly the selective-winners setup that can work even in a difficult tape.

Macro is still a mild headwind in a persistent BEAR regime, and the prior session's attempted increase was vetoed. Near-term quant confirmation is incomplete: 3m theme momentum is negative (-2.19), several mega-cap software/platform names are weak, and volatility is elevated (40.64). With no meaningful improvement in the broader risk backdrop since the veto, this is not the session to push for a higher conviction despite the constructive narrative.

Narrative is modestly improving as housing stabilizes and select builders like Toll Brothers show resilience. Quant internals are not uniformly bad: TOL, O, SPG, and AMT show pockets of positive 3m momentum and relative strength, suggesting the theme is not collapsing and could respond if rates ease or labor data stabilizes.

Macro remains a clear headwind for rate-sensitive exposure, with BEAR regime conditions, weakening labor momentum, and unresolved inflation uncertainty. Theme-level momentum is still negative on both 6m (-7.51) and 3m (-2.16), with negative average relative strength (-1.61). The narrative improvement is too shallow and too fragile to justify lifting conviction from the floor.

The medium-term story is still attractive: AI capex spillover into power, grid, and nuclear remains intact, and narrative tone is solidly positive. Quant leadership from GEV and NEE is strong, with GEV especially showing exceptional momentum and relative strength, which supports the idea that the market still rewards the highest-quality power infrastructure beneficiaries.

This theme was explicitly cut in a prior session and the blocking condition has not improved enough. Macro is mildly negative, 3m theme momentum is negative (-3.93), relative strength is slightly negative (-1.73), volatility is high (59.86), and most importantly SMR portfolio drawdown remains deeply breached at -20.51%, worse than the prior veto threshold issue. Given unresolved drawdown stress, I cannot advocate an increase yet.

Quantitatively this remains one of the strongest themes in the book: 6m momentum (+24.14), 3m momentum (+18.49), positive relative strength (+5.94), and generally solid Sharpe ratios across the core defense names. Policy support from the large defense request keeps the longer-cycle spending thesis alive, so the underlying fundamental case is still respectable.

Narrative has softened and continues to drift away from a war-premium trade toward a slower budget-support story. Macro is only mildly negative, but the bigger issue is unresolved risk baggage: PLTR portfolio drawdown remains severely breached at -18.87%, still far above the prior 10% limit cited in vetoes. With that live breach still active, strong momentum is not enough to justify adding conviction.

There are still isolated signs of commercialization and government support, and the theme's long-run upside remains substantial if capital markets reopen for frontier tech. GOOG provides a stabilizing anchor within the basket, and 6m average momentum is slightly positive (+1.82), which prevents the setup from being even worse.

This is still one of the weakest themes on the board. Macro is strongly negative for high-beta duration assets, narrative remains negative, 3m momentum is deeply weak (-24.18), relative strength is extremely poor (-26.68), volatility is very high (65.0), concentration is excessive (HHI 0.3061), and portfolio drawdowns remain severe (IONQ -15.19, RGTI -9.89). Prior sessions already flagged this as a narrative demotion and nothing has improved enough to revisit that view.

This theme has some defensive ballast and a mildly constructive narrative, helped by tariff exemptions and product-specific innovation headlines. Macro drag is limited relative to other growth sleeves, and drawdowns from entry are not catastrophic, leaving room for future improvement if relative strength turns.

The prior attempt to increase this theme was vetoed, and the quant picture still does not support retrying. Theme 3m momentum is negative (-7.47), relative strength is poor (-15.1), and leadership is narrow with LLY/ABBV offset by major weakness in NVO and ISRG. The narrative is mildly positive but not a true shift, so there is not enough new evidence to push conviction higher.

There is a genuine narrative shift toward institutionalization, with Morgan Stanley's product expansion reinforcing that digital asset access continues to mature. That separation between bitcoin adoption and crypto-equity monetization could eventually create a better-quality investable setup later.

For the current theme construction, the quant and macro evidence remain decisively negative. Macro headwind is the worst in the set, 6m momentum is deeply negative (-38.88), 3m momentum is still poor (-18.59), relative strength is weak (-16.61), volatility is extreme (67.91), concentration is excessive (HHI 0.3061), and portfolio drawdowns remain stressed (COIN -15.75, MSTR -7.38). The narrative shift is not enough because it is constructive for access products more than for the equity basket we actually hold.

This remains the cleanest fit for the macro regime. Macro impact is positive, narrative is modestly supportive, and quant confirmation is excellent: 6m momentum (+18.46), 3m momentum (+13.79), strong relative strength (+9.25), low volatility (17.78), and shallow portfolio drawdowns. In a persistent BEAR tape, this is still the portfolio's best ballast.

At conviction 9, much of the thesis is already expressed, so the marginal benefit of pushing further is limited. GDP is still strong enough to cap the upside of pure defensiveness, and some components like PG and TLT have weaker Sharpe profiles. This is a hold-high-conviction setup rather than a fresh increase.

Bullish-leaning analyst bias (0.55) tempered by persistent BEAR regime, unresolved veto-level drawdown breaches, and prior-session risk rejections of conviction increases.

Summary: Despite my structural bullish bias, this session does not justify broad conviction increases. The macro regime remains firmly BEAR and prior veto conditions are still active, especially unresolved drawdown breaches in energy_grid and defense_aerospace plus concentrated high-VaR stress in quantum and crypto_digital. The best underlying upside story is still ai_compute, where narrative leadership remains strong, but I am holding rather than re-proposing an increase because the prior veto has not been invalidated by enough risk improvement. Defensive stays high conviction as the regime-consistent winner. I recommend renewed negative pressure only on the most fragile speculative sleeves: quantum and crypto_digital.

Macro headwind remains negative in a confirmed BEAR regime (impact score -0.22).

Theme 3m momentum is negative at -2.19% despite positive 6m momentum, showing near-term deterioration.

Theme average volatility is 40.64%, high for a 25% max-allocation sleeve.

Multiple constituents exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold: NVDA -3.46%, AMD -4.24%, AVGO -3.76%, TSM -3.06%, SMCI -6.41%, ASML -3.72%.

Internal dispersion is high: strong names like ASML/TSM contrast with weak names like SMCI (-25.93% 6m, -10.12% 3m) and MSFT (-18.59% 6m, -17.36% 3m).

Macro impact is materially negative at -0.35, one of the weaker theme-level macro readings.

Theme momentum is weak: -7.51% over 6m and -2.16% over 3m.

Relative strength vs SPY is negative at -1.61 on average.

Several names breach the 3% daily VaR threshold: DHI -3.36%, LEN -3.53%, RKT -4.90%.

Live entry drawdown in LEN is -4.85%, notable for a moderate-risk theme with a 10% max-drawdown limit.

Live realized drawdown breach remains unresolved: SMR portfolio drawdown is -20.51%, exceeding the theme max-drawdown limit of 12% by 8.51 percentage points.

Theme average volatility is 59.86%, extremely high for a moderate-risk theme.

Multiple constituents have daily VaR far above the 3% threshold: CEG -4.42%, FSLR -4.59%, SMR -9.80%, UEC -7.05%, GEV -4.05%.

Theme 3m momentum is negative at -3.93%, with severe weakness in SMR (-44.20%) and FSLR (-22.70%).

Macro backdrop is still negative (impact score -0.18), so there is no macro support to offset the breach-level position risk.

Live realized drawdown breach remains unresolved: PLTR portfolio drawdown is -18.87%, exceeding the theme max-drawdown limit of 10% by 8.87 percentage points.

Theme conviction is already high at 5, increasing sensitivity to any single-name damage inside the sleeve.

PLTR daily VaR is -5.82%, well above the 3% threshold.

Prior-session narrative deterioration remains relevant: near-term defense momentum has weakened even if long-cycle fundamentals are intact.

Most of the sleeve is strong, but PLTR is a destabilizing outlier with -16.72% 3m momentum and 53.82% volatility.

Theme concentration is excessive: HHI 0.3061, above the 0.25 concentration-risk threshold.

Theme average volatility is 65.00%, extremely high.

Theme 3m momentum is deeply negative at -24.18%, and relative strength vs SPY is -26.68 on average.

Daily VaR is far above threshold in key names: IONQ -8.01%, RGTI -8.78%, IBM -3.05%.

Live entry drawdowns remain severe: IONQ -15.19%, RGTI -9.89%, IBM -4.53%.

Macro impact is strongly negative at -0.55, creating a double flag with weak momentum.

Theme 3m momentum is negative at -7.47%, and average relative strength vs SPY is weak at -15.10.

Theme average volatility is 42.43%, elevated for a moderate-risk sleeve.

Several names exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold: LLY -3.37%, NVO -4.08%, CRSP -5.88%.

Key constituents show weak risk-adjusted performance: NVO Sharpe -0.75, ISRG Sharpe -0.291.

Macro impact is only slightly negative (-0.08), but the tape is not rewarding the group.

Theme concentration is excessive: HHI 0.3061, above the 0.25 threshold.

Theme average volatility is 67.91%, among the highest in the portfolio.

Theme momentum is very weak: -38.88% over 6m and -18.59% over 3m.

All constituents exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold: COIN -6.48%, MSTR -6.99%, MARA -7.72%, XYZ -4.88%.

Live entry drawdowns remain severe in COIN (-15.75%) and MSTR (-7.38%).

Macro impact is strongly negative at -0.62, the worst among all themes, creating a double flag with weak momentum.

No concentration flag: HHI 0.2066 is below the 0.25 threshold.

Theme average volatility is low at 17.78%, the lowest-risk sleeve in the portfolio.

Theme momentum is strong: +18.46% over 6m and +13.79% over 3m, with average relative strength vs SPY of +9.25.

All daily VaR readings are below the 3% threshold.

Macro impact is positive at +0.18 in the current BEAR regime.

Energy_grid breach: SMR portfolio drawdown is -20.51%, exceeding theme max-drawdown limit of 12%.

Defense_aerospace breach: PLTR portfolio drawdown is -18.87%, exceeding theme max-drawdown limit of 10%.

Quantum stress remains active from entry: IONQ -15.19%, RGTI -9.89%, IBM -4.53%.

Crypto stress remains active from entry: COIN -15.75%, MSTR -7.38%.

Summary: Risk remains decisively elevated at the portfolio level. The BEAR regime is persistent and high-confidence, prior veto conditions are still unresolved, and there are still two active realized drawdown breaches versus theme limits in energy_grid and defense_aerospace. The most acute forward risk sits in quantum and crypto_digital, where concentration (HHI 0.3061), extreme VaR, weak momentum, and strongly negative macro impacts all align. AI is not broken, but its near-term momentum and VaR profile do not justify adding risk in this tape. Defensive remains the only sleeve with supportive macro, positive momentum, low volatility, and acceptable VaR. Recommendation: maintain veto on all conviction increases, prioritize reductions/exits in quantum and crypto_digital, reduce breach exposure in energy_grid, and hedge or trim defense_aerospace until PLTR drawdown risk is brought back inside limits.

Summary: VETOED: Portfolio-level risk remains in veto territory. The market regime is firmly BEAR with 88.1% confidence, 20-day persistence, and a 0.98 BEAR->BEAR continuation probability, and the prior veto conditions remain unresolved. Two live realized drawdown breaches are still active versus theme limits: energy_grid has SMR at -20.51% vs the theme max-drawdown limit of 12%, and defense_aerospace has PLTR at -18.87% vs the 10% limit. Concentration risk remains excessive in quantum and crypto_digital (HHI 0.3061 > 0.25 in both), and those sleeves still carry extreme daily VaR far above the 3% threshold (RGTI -8.78%, IONQ -8.01%, MARA -7.72%, MSTR -6.99%, COIN -6.48%). Conditions have not improved enough versus prior vetoed sessions to justify any conviction increase.. Only conviction decreases applied.

Summary: 20 orders, 8 risk exits, 1 sells, 11 buys, turnover 6.38%, regime sizing 50%


HMM regime has flipped from a prior BEAR (88% confidence, ~20-day persistence) to a BULL regime now (BULL prob 0.629, confidence 62.9; persistence 2 days). Macro inputs point to a still-supportive growth/credit backdrop (GDP +5.36% YoY, unemployment 4.3% rising only slightly), and the yield curve is no longer inverted (T10Y2Y spread +0.51%), reducing recession tail risk versus the prior veto period.

Fed is effectively restrictive but not tightening further in this snapshot: policy rate at 3.64% with inflation still above target (CPI +3.32% YoY). With the yield curve no longer inverted, the near-term rate/discount-rate headwind is easing, though real rates may remain restrictive until inflation decisively cools.

Inflation is moderating but not conquered: CPI YoY 3.32% (down from typical peaks, but still above 2%). This supports a “higher-for-longer” risk premium rather than a clean easing cycle.

Growth looks resilient: GDP +5.36% YoY and unemployment only modestly higher (4.3% vs 4.2% prior year). ISM Manufacturing Employment is elevated (MANEMP 12591), consistent with ongoing demand for industrial inputs and capex labor, lowering recession odds.

Explanation: BULL regime plus resilient growth (GDP +5.36%, unemployment 4.3%) and easing recession signals (T10Y2Y +0.51%) are tailwinds for AI infrastructure demand; prior risk-off has been less dominant than in the prior BEAR veto sessions.

Explanation: Housing starts are improving (HOUST +9.5% YoY to 1487k), and the yield curve is not inverted, which helps rate-sensitive construction/REIT cashflows; however CPI at 3.32% keeps the rate-relief fragile.

Explanation: Macro is not clearly recessionary (growth resilient, curve normal), but the theme remains vulnerable to risk appetite and prior drawdown stress; with VIX/jobless-claims missing, the net macro tailwind is limited.

Explanation: Defense is relatively macro-insensitive, and BULL regime reduces broad risk premia; still, inflation at 3.32% and the prior market narrative shift away from immediate “war premium” momentum temper upside.

Explanation: Even with a BULL regime, quantum remains highly sensitive to risk appetite and liquidity; without VIX/claims confirmation, the macro tailwind is modest and the theme’s historical volatility keeps it slightly headwind.

Explanation: Biotech has defensive/structural demand characteristics and benefits from stable growth; unemployment is not spiking (4.3%), but CPI above target can still pressure valuation multiples.

Explanation: Crypto typically benefits from risk-on, but the absence of VIX and liquidity pulse (missing VIX/ICSA/consumer sentiment) prevents confirming a clean risk-on impulse; net effect is slightly negative given uncertainty.

Explanation: With inflation still above target (3.32%) and unemployment only mildly higher, defensives can benefit from “not-perfect” macro conditions; BULL regime limits upside, but stability is still a relative tailwind.

Inflation persistence risk: CPI at +3.32% YoY keeps discount-rate pressure alive, which can re-compress long-duration growth/innovation themes (ai_compute/quantum).

Recession re-acceleration risk is not gone: while T10Y2Y is now +0.51% (not inverted), unemployment is drifting up (4.3% vs 4.2% prior year) and missing jobless claims/VIX data prevents ruling out renewed stress.

Risk-premium volatility risk: VIX is missing; if VIX were to spike (>20), it would likely hit high-beta themes (quantum, crypto_digital) disproportionately despite the BULL regime label.

Summary: Macro conditions have improved versus the prior BEAR veto period: the yield curve is no longer inverted (+0.51%) and growth remains strong (GDP +5.36%, unemployment 4.3%). Net, this favors AI compute and defensives/health, supports real estate modestly via rising housing starts (+9.5% YoY), while quantum/crypto remain slightly headwind due to uncertainty in market-volatility/liquidity (missing VIX/claims) and their higher risk sensitivity.

Meta expands CoreWeave partnership with new $21B AI cloud deal

TSMC Tops Q1 Sales Target On Strong AI Chip Demand

Taiwan Semiconductor Revenue Skyrockets On Unstoppable AI Demand

Chips are still where the AI trade's rubber meets the road

Nvidia-Backed Lumentum Can't Build Fast Enough to Meet AI Demand

Amazon’s Amazing Comeback

Move Over Nvidia: Citron Sees 28% Upside In Amazon's Hidden Trillion-Dollar Chip Empire

Jim Cramer's 'Hardware-Only' Trade: Marvell And Intel Surge As Software Stocks Sink

Scott Bessent, Jerome Powell Quietly Warn Top Wall Street CEOs About Cyber Risks From Anthropic's New AI Model: Report

Software, Cybersecurity Stocks Tank. Anthropic and OpenAI Fears Rattle the Sector

Big Tech puts financial heft behind next-gen nuclear power as AI demand surges

ENTRA1 Lawsuits And Commercialization Concerns Might Change The Case For Investing In NuScale Power (SMR)

Why The NuScale Power (SMR) Investment Narrative Is Shifting As Analysts Reset Expectations

This Just Might Be the Best AI Dividend ETF You Can Own Today

This One ETF Gives Retirees Quiet Exposure to AI Infrastructure REITs

SBA Communications Stock Soars on Buyout Interest. What It Means for Tower Stocks.

Palantir Stock “Priced for Perfection,” Says Pro. But Here’s Why It’s Not Time to Sell

'Anthropic is Eating Palantir's Lunch': Michael Burry

Palantir Stock Takes A Burry Beatdown: Are Dip‑Buyers Done?

Quantum Computing ETFs Are Dying. Pivot to These 3 AI ETFs

IonQ (IONQ) Valuation Check After Horizon Quantum Deal And Recent Share Price Volatility

Rigetti Is Growing Sales of Quantum Computers. That’s Good for the Stock.

Eli Lilly’s Foundayo Weight-Loss Pill Hits the Shelves. It’s a Turning Point for the Stock.

Who Benefits From Amazon Pharmacy Stocking Eli Lilly’s New Weight Loss Pill

What Novo Nordisk (CPSE:NOVO B)'s Higher-Dose, Lower-Priced Wegovy Move Means For Shareholders

Eli Lilly loses weight loss drug market share as generics flood India

Why Is HIMS Stock Down 40%?

Strategy's New Product Grew Faster Than The iPhone And Google Ads Combined

Renewed Bitcoin Buys Funded By Stretch Preferred Stock Could Be A Game Changer For Strategy (MSTR)

Bitcoin's Comeback Leaves A Bigger Question

Coca-Cola’s Marriott Win Puts Hotel Reach And Valuation In Focus

UnitedHealth Stock Edges Higher After Medicare Advantage Payment Update

Meta expands CoreWeave partnership with new $21B AI cloud deal

TSMC Tops Q1 Sales Target On Strong AI Chip Demand

Taiwan Semiconductor Revenue Skyrockets On Unstoppable AI Demand

Jim Cramer's 'Hardware-Only' Trade: Marvell And Intel Surge As Software Stocks Sink

Material evolution of the prior shift is continuing: AI is no longer a broad beta story but a control-of-infrastructure story. Chips, foundry capacity, optical links, custom silicon, and dedicated cloud capacity are strengthening as the winners, while software layers face repricing from model competition and cyber-risk concerns. This is a narrowing, not a collapse, of the AI bull narrative.

This Just Might Be the Best AI Dividend ETF You Can Own Today

This One ETF Gives Retirees Quiet Exposure to AI Infrastructure REITs

SBA Communications Stock Soars on Buyout Interest. What It Means for Tower Stocks.

Big Tech puts financial heft behind next-gen nuclear power as AI demand surges

ENTRA1 Lawsuits And Commercialization Concerns Might Change The Case For Investing In NuScale Power (SMR)

Why The NuScale Power (SMR) Investment Narrative Is Shifting As Analysts Reset Expectations

'Anthropic is Eating Palantir's Lunch': Michael Burry

Palantir Stock Takes A Burry Beatdown: Are Dip‑Buyers Done?

Palantir Faces Pressure Despite Bullish Price Targets

Quantum Computing ETFs Are Dying. Pivot to These 3 AI ETFs

IonQ (IONQ) Valuation Check After Horizon Quantum Deal And Recent Share Price Volatility

Rigetti Is Growing Sales of Quantum Computers. That’s Good for the Stock.

Eli Lilly’s Foundayo Weight-Loss Pill Hits the Shelves. It’s a Turning Point for the Stock.

Who Benefits From Amazon Pharmacy Stocking Eli Lilly’s New Weight Loss Pill

What Novo Nordisk (CPSE:NOVO B)'s Higher-Dose, Lower-Priced Wegovy Move Means For Shareholders

Eli Lilly loses weight loss drug market share as generics flood India

Strategy's New Product Grew Faster Than The iPhone And Google Ads Combined

Renewed Bitcoin Buys Funded By Stretch Preferred Stock Could Be A Game Chner For Strategy (MSTR)

Bitcoin's Comeback Leaves A Bigger Question

Coca-Cola’s Marriott Win Puts Hotel Reach And Valuation In Focus

Coca-Cola (KO) Outpaces Stock Market Gains: What You Should Know

UnitedHealth Stock Edges Higher After Medicare Advantage Payment Update

AI capex is propagating beyond semis into power and physical infrastructure: Meta/CoreWeave and Reuters nuclear funding reinforce compute-to-grid spillover.

The prior AI bifurcation is strengthening: hardware/infrastructure winners are gaining narrative share while software and cyber names are being repriced on model competition and security fears.

Quantum continues to lose narrative sponsorship to AI infrastructure; this looks like continuation of yesterday's demotion rather than a fresh shift.

GLP-1 distribution is becoming a platform story as Amazon/telehealth channels reshape access, linking biotech commercialization with consumer/logistics infrastructure.

Defensive leadership remains supported by macro uncertainty and software de-rating, but this is rotation support rather than a new standalone narrative.

Summary: Slightly positive but selective session. The most important narrative remains AI narrowing into an infrastructure-control trade: TSMC demand, Meta/CoreWeave capacity commitments, and optical bottlenecks all reinforce bullishness for compute owners, while software and cyber names are being repriced as Anthropic/OpenAI competition and AI security concerns rise. A second, rarer shift is emerging across AI and energy: Big Tech is no longer merely consuming power, it is actively financing future generation, especially nuclear, which strengthens the long-duration case for grid buildout even as SMR-specific execution risk stays high. Elsewhere, quantum's narrative demotion persists, biotech improves on GLP-1 distribution expansion, crypto shows modest resilience through institutionalized treasury structures, and defensives retain relative support in a still-bearish macro regime.

Macro has improved materially versus the prior veto period: regime flipped to BULL, the curve is no longer inverted, and growth remains resilient. Narrative remains the strongest positive signal in the whole set: AI is narrowing into an infrastructure-control trade, which directly benefits this theme's chip/foundry/cloud-capacity exposure. Quant confirms enough of the story despite some internal dispersion: 6m theme momentum is positive (+9.82), relative strength vs SPY is positive (+3.15), and key infrastructure names like TSM, ASML, AMD and NVDA remain strong. This looks like a better-quality AI bull case than broad speculative AI beta.

The theme is no longer uniformly strong: 3m momentum is slightly negative (-1.82), and several mega-cap software/platform names are weak (MSFT, AMZN, META), matching the narrative that software layers are being repriced. Inflation persistence still threatens long-duration multiples, and volatility is elevated (40.64 avg) with some ugly stock-level drawdowns, especially SMCI. So this is a selective upgrade for infrastructure winners, not an all-clear for the entire AI complex.

Macro is modestly better for rate-sensitive assets: housing starts are improving, the curve has normalized, and the prior recession scare has eased. Narrative is mildly constructive around AI infrastructure REITs and tower assets, and some REIT-linked names (O, AMT, SPG) show decent 3m momentum and positive relative strength.

Quant still does not confirm a broad theme turn. Theme-average 6m momentum (-8.9), 3m momentum (-2.49), and relative strength (-4.62) remain weak, with builders and mortgage exposure still under pressure. The positive narrative is too narrow and too mild to justify re-upping conviction after prior fragile rate-relief setups. Better to wait for broader price confirmation.

There is a real long-duration narrative here: AI capex is spilling into power generation and grid buildout, and Big Tech financing next-gen nuclear is an important structural catalyst. Some components of the basket are acting well, especially GEV and NEE, with strong momentum and Sharpe. If the market keeps rewarding physical AI infrastructure, this theme could re-rate from a low base.

This remains blocked by unresolved risk damage. Macro impact is slightly negative, 3m theme momentum is still negative (-4.53), volatility is very high (59.78), concentration is elevated, and SMR remains a major drag with catastrophic drawdown/history (-82.86 max, -18.59 portfolio drawdown). Prior vetoes specifically flagged this sleeve, and while conditions improved a bit, they have not improved enough to justify repeating a bullish increase yet.

Price action is actually strong across the core defense complex: theme-average 6m momentum is +22.13, 3m is +18.9, and most traditional primes show solid relative strength with good Sharpe and manageable volatility. Macro is neutral-to-slightly supportive, and the sector remains fundamentally durable even if the war-premium narrative has cooled.

Narrative is the problem. The market is rotating away from immediate defense/cyber excitement, and PLTR-specific weakness is dragging the sleeve both narratively and from a risk-control perspective. Prior sessions were vetoed partly because PLTR drawdown breached limits, and that remains severe at -22.83 portfolio drawdown. Strong legacy defense momentum offsets this, but not enough to justify a fresh increase while the sleeve still carries an unresolved internal breach.

At a very low base, the macro backdrop is less hostile than during the BEAR regime, and there are isolated fundamental positives around commercialization and partnerships. Because conviction is already at 1, the downside from here is mostly opportunity cost rather than another allocation cut.

This is still one of the weakest themes in the book. Narrative remains clearly negative, with quantum losing sponsorship to AI infrastructure. Quant is poor across the board: 3m momentum is -24.95, relative strength is -25.25, volatility is extreme (64.89), concentration is too high (HHI 0.3061), and VaR/drawdown remain unacceptable. Prior veto logic has not materially changed here, so no retry on the bullish side.

This is the best candidate for a measured catch-up increase. Macro is modestly supportive, narrative is clearly positive around GLP-1 commercialization/distribution, and the prior contested +1 case now has a better backdrop because the regime has flipped from BEAR to BULL and recession tail risk has eased. Risk metrics are not pristine, but they are far more tolerable than in the speculative sleeves, and portfolio drawdowns are manageable. With conviction starting at just 1, a small increase is justified.

Quant confirmation is only partial. Theme-average 3m momentum is negative (-7.3), relative strength is poor (-13.88), and the basket is uneven with NVO, ISRG, and CRSP lagging. This is more of a narrative/macro-led early add than a fully confirmed trend. If GLP-1 enthusiasm narrows further or valuation pressure returns, this upgrade could prove premature.

Narrative has stabilized somewhat: institutional treasury structures and bitcoin-access stories are keeping the space relevant, and macro is less hostile than during the BEAR regime. Since conviction is already minimal, maintaining rather than cutting further recognizes that the sleeve could rebound sharply if liquidity/risk appetite improves.

The quant profile is still too weak for any increase. Theme-average 6m momentum is -38.28, 3m is -20.11, relative strength is -13.76, volatility is extreme (67.8), concentration is excessive (HHI 0.3061), and VaR/drawdowns remain severe. Prior vetoes repeatedly flagged this sleeve, and the underlying risk objections have not been resolved. Slightly better narrative is not enough.

This remains one of the cleanest quantitative themes: strong 6m/3m momentum, positive relative strength (+8.87), low volatility (17.75), and shallow portfolio drawdowns. Macro still supports stability trades because inflation is not fully beaten and the environment is improved but not perfect. Holding high conviction is justified.

The regime flip to BULL reduces the urgency of adding even more defensiveness, and at conviction 9 the upside from further bullishness is limited. If risk-on broadens, this sleeve may lag higher-beta themes. So while the theme remains strong, the right call is to hold rather than press further.

Bullish lean applied, but constrained by unresolved drawdown/concentration risk in energy_grid, defense_aerospace internals, quantum, and crypto_digital.

Summary: Macro has improved meaningfully versus the prior veto sessions: regime flipped to BULL, growth is resilient, and the curve is no longer inverted. That opens the door for selective conviction increases, but not a broad risk-on reset. I recommend +1 to ai_compute because the strongest narrative shift in the dataset is still bullish for infrastructure owners and quant broadly confirms. I also recommend +1 to biotech_health as a measured catch-up add now that the prior BEAR-regime veto backdrop has eased. Hold all other themes unchanged: real_estate lacks price confirmation, energy_grid still carries unresolved drawdown baggage, defense_aerospace has strong core momentum but PLTR-related risk overhang, and quantum/crypto remain too weak and too risky despite the better macro tape.

Theme volatility is high at 40.64% annualized, with several names carrying >3% daily VaR: NVDA -3.46%, AMD -4.24%, AVGO -3.75%, TSM -3.05%, SMCI -6.40%, ASML -3.72%.

Momentum is mixed despite improved macro: theme average 6m momentum is +9.82% but 3m momentum is -1.82%, with notable weakness in AVGO (-15.93%), SMCI (-9.22%), MSFT (-17.71%), and AMZN (-6.70%).

Historical drawdown risk remains material in key constituents: SMCI max drawdown -66.18%, MSFT -34.18%, META -33.45%, AVGO -28.95%.

Macro tailwind improved versus prior veto sessions, but inflation persistence at 3.32% keeps long-duration multiple compression risk alive.

Theme momentum remains weak: average 6m momentum -8.90% and 3m momentum -2.49%, despite modest macro support from housing starts and a normalized curve.

Relative strength is negative versus SPY at -4.62% on average, indicating the sleeve is still lagging the tape.

Several names exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold: DHI -3.36%, LEN -3.52%, RKT -4.90%.

Live drawdowns are present but not breach-level: LEN portfolio drawdown -5.51% versus theme max-drawdown limit 10%.

A live drawdown breach remains active: SMR portfolio drawdown is -18.59%, exceeding the theme max-drawdown limit of 12%. This is improved from prior veto sessions (~-20.5%) but still unresolved.

Theme volatility is extreme at 59.78% annualized, with multiple names far above the 3% daily VaR threshold: CEG -4.41%, FSLR -4.57%, SMR -9.78%, UEC -7.05%, GEV -4.03%.

Momentum is unstable: theme average 6m momentum is only +0.23% and 3m momentum is -4.53%; SMR is especially weak at -63.92% over 6m and -41.93% over 3m.

Historical drawdown profile is poor in several constituents: SMR -82.86%, UEC -39.97%, CEG -38.84%, FSLR -35.10%.

Macro impact is slightly negative (-0.05), so there is no strong macro cushion for this risk.

A live drawdown breach remains active: PLTR portfolio drawdown is -22.83%, exceeding the theme max-drawdown limit of 10%. This is worse than the prior veto sessions and is the clearest unresolved risk in the book.

Theme-level momentum is strong overall, but it is masking internal dispersion: PLTR 6m momentum -9.08% and 3m momentum -16.63% versus strong gains in LMT/RTX/NOC/LHX.

PLTR daily VaR is -5.82%, well above the 3% threshold, creating outsized single-name risk inside a moderate-risk-tolerance theme.

Current conviction is already 5, making this one of the larger thematic bets while a breach-level position remains unresolved.

Theme concentration is excessive: HHI 0.3061, above the 0.25 concentration-risk threshold.

Theme volatility is extreme at 64.89% annualized.

Daily VaR is far above threshold in core speculative names: IONQ -7.99%, RGTI -8.78%, IBM -3.03%.

Momentum is severely negative: theme average 3m momentum -24.95% and relative strength versus SPY -25.25%.

Live entry drawdowns remain significant: IONQ -13.05%, RGTI -6.64%, IBM -5.41%.

Historical drawdown profile is severe: IONQ -67.61%, RGTI -77.10%.

Prior session concern remains valid: this sleeve has not healed enough to justify any increase even with the regime flip.

Theme average relative strength is weak at -13.88% versus SPY, and 3m momentum is negative at -7.30%.

Volatility is elevated at 42.36% annualized for a moderate-risk-tolerance theme.

Several names exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold: LLY -3.36%, NVO -4.08%, CRSP -5.87%.

Internal quality is mixed, with negative Sharpe in NVO (-0.726) and ISRG (-0.313).

Live drawdowns are manageable but present: ISRG -5.44%, ABBV -2.84%, LLY -1.22%.

Theme concentration is excessive: HHI 0.3061, above the 0.25 threshold.

Theme volatility is extreme at 67.80% annualized.

All constituents are above the 3% daily VaR threshold: COIN -6.48%, MSTR -6.99%, MARA -7.71%, XYZ -4.86%.

Momentum is decisively negative: average 6m momentum -38.28% and 3m momentum -20.11%.

Live drawdowns remain severe in key names: COIN -16.78%, MSTR -6.19%.

Historical drawdown profile is catastrophic for a live sleeve: COIN -66.39%, MSTR -76.53%, MARA -70.53%, XYZ -39.48%.

Macro impact remains slightly negative (-0.08) because the regime flip lacks confirming volatility/liquidity data.

This is the cleanest stabilizer in the portfolio: theme volatility is only 17.75% annualized and all daily VaR readings are below 3%.

Momentum and relative strength are both positive: average 6m momentum +17.86%, 3m +12.81%, relative strength +8.87% versus SPY.

No live drawdown stress is present beyond minor noise; largest is JNJ at -2.11%, well inside the theme max-drawdown limit of 5%.

Some internal Sharpe weakness exists in PG (-0.817) and TLT (-0.406), but portfolio-protection function remains intact.

Energy_grid breach remains active: SMR portfolio drawdown -18.59% exceeds theme max-drawdown limit 12%.

Defense_aerospace breach remains active and worsened: PLTR portfolio drawdown -22.83% exceeds theme max-drawdown limit 10%.

Quantum sleeve still carries meaningful entry losses: IONQ -13.05%, RGTI -6.64%, IBM -5.41%.

Crypto_digital sleeve still carries meaningful entry losses: COIN -16.78%, MSTR -6.19%.

Summary: Risk has improved from the prior veto sessions because the regime flipped from persistent BEAR to early BULL, recession signals eased, and one prior breach (SMR) has partially healed. But portfolio risk is still high, not clean. The main reason I am not extending the prior veto is that portfolio-level correlation is low across themes and the macro regime is no longer structurally hostile. That said, two live drawdown breaches remain unresolved: SMR in energy_grid and, more importantly, PLTR in defense_aerospace, which has worsened to -22.83% versus a 10% theme limit. The speculative sleeves remain the biggest risk concentrations: quantum and crypto_digital both have HHI 0.3061, extreme volatility, and daily VaR far above threshold, with weak momentum and poor entry-point drawdowns. Net: PRS 0.68 means high risk but below veto territory. No conviction increases should be favored in energy_grid, defense_aerospace, quantum, or crypto_digital; priority should be reducing breach-level and concentrated speculative risk while maintaining at least a 3 conviction floor in defensive.

Summary: 8 themes processed. 4 conviction changes

Summary: 31 orders, 9 sells, 22 buys, turnover 7.5%, regime sizing 100%


Market regime is BEAR (state prob BEAR 0.52; confidence 52%) and has persisted ~21 days with a very high BEAR->BEAR continuation probability (0.98). Macro inputs show still-restrictive policy (Fed funds 3.64%) with inflation not fully cooled (CPI YoY 3.32%) and labor remaining only mildly weaker (UNRATE 4.3% vs 4.2% prior year), while the yield curve is not inverted (10Y-2Y spread +0.51%), reducing recession-signal severity versus a fully inverted curve.

Restrictive/hold: Fed funds at 3.64% alongside CPI at 3.32% YoY suggests policy is not yet clearly pivoting to easing; risk assets remain pressured in a BEAR regime.

Moderating but sticky: CPI YoY 3.32% is below prior peaks (implied by being near the 3% zone) yet not low enough to confidently force rapid rate cuts; this supports higher-for-longer discount rates.

Mixed-to-slow: unemployment is slightly higher (4.3% vs 4.2%), consumer sentiment has fallen (UMCSENT 56.6 vs 64.7 prior year), and manufacturing employment proxy is elevated (MANEMP value provided but not interpretable as a rate without context). Net: growth risk is skewed down by sentiment/labor drift, but the non-inverted yield curve (+0.51%) tempers recession odds.

Explanation: Despite the BEAR regime, AI & compute can retain a relative tailwind because the macro backdrop is not showing a hard recession signal (10Y-2Y +0.51%) and inflation is only moderately above target (3.32% YoY). However, risk-off conditions still pressure high-multiple equities, limiting upside.

Explanation: Real estate is rate-sensitive and the Fed funds level (3.64%) plus sticky inflation (3.32% YoY) is a headwind for affordability and refinancing. Consumer sentiment is weaker (56.6 vs 64.7), which further undermines housing demand.

Explanation: Energy & grid is partly inflation/industrial-activity sensitive, but the current BEAR regime and weaker consumer sentiment reduce risk appetite for long-duration infrastructure plays. With no recession confirmation from the yield curve (+0.51%), the headwind is moderate rather than severe.

Explanation: Defense is relatively insulated from the business cycle, so BEAR risk-off is less damaging than for cyclicals. Still, the macro data (slightly weakening labor sentiment) doesn’t provide a strong incremental tailwind, keeping this near-neutral.

Explanation: Quantum is high-beta/high-duration and typically suffers in BEAR regimes as discount rates and risk premia rise. With inflation not decisively falling (3.32% YoY) and consumer sentiment down, speculative tech allocations face tighter financial conditions.

Explanation: Biotech has some defensive characteristics (health demand is less cyclical), so it can hold up better than pure growth. Nonetheless, BEAR risk sentiment still caps upside, making the net effect mildly positive rather than strong.

Explanation: Crypto equities/digital-asset exposure generally deteriorate in BEAR regimes due to liquidity/risk appetite compression; VIX and jobless claims are missing here, but the regime itself is bearish. Sticky inflation (3.32% YoY) and restrictive policy (3.64%) further pressure speculative duration assets.

Explanation: Defensive/hedge themes benefit from BEAR regimes as investors rotate toward stability; consumer sentiment has weakened (56.6 vs 64.7), supporting demand for defensives. With the yield curve not inverted (+0.51%), the environment is not an extreme recession panic, so the tailwind is strong but not maximal.

Recession-risk signal is mixed: the yield curve is not inverted (T10Y2Y +0.51%), but unemployment is drifting up (UNRATE 4.3% vs 4.2% prior year) and consumer sentiment is down (UMCSENT 56.6 vs 64.7), which can still tip growth lower.

Sticky inflation keeps discount rates elevated: CPI YoY 3.32% alongside Fed funds at 3.64% implies limited near-term easing, which is particularly harmful for high-duration themes (quantum, crypto_digital, parts of AI).

Risk-off regime persistence: BEAR regime has ~21 days persistence and BEAR->BEAR continuation probability of 0.98, increasing the odds that speculative sleeves underperform longer than expected.

Summary: Macro conditions are consistent with a persistent BEAR regime: restrictive policy (3.64% Fed funds) and only moderately cooled inflation (CPI 3.32% YoY) coincide with weaker consumer sentiment (UMCSENT 56.6). This is a headwind for rate- and risk-sensitive themes (real_estate, quantum, crypto_digital) while defensives benefit; AI & compute is relatively supported but still capped by risk-off conditions.

MATCH Act Puts ASML China Revenue And Service Exposure Under Spotlight

ASML Slides as U.S. Targets China Sales

Meta's Latest $21 Billion Move Could Help De-Risk CoreWeave's Growth: Analyst

OpenAI Stargate Leaders Depart in Latest Shakeup to Data Center Strategy

Jim Cramer's 'Hardware-Only' Trade: Marvell And Intel Surge As Software Stocks Sink

Chip Stocks Are at Record Highs. Why That Feels a ‘Wee Bit’ Much.

'EU Commission wants to regulate ChatGPT more strictly in the future'- Handelsblatt

'Powell, Bessent discussed Anthropic's Mythos AI cyber threat with major U.S. banks' - CNBC

Builder Stocks Jump on Cease-Fire. A Tough Year Could Be Turning Around.

Toll Brothers Stock Could Lead Homebuilder Rebound as Housing Stabilizes

D R Horton Faces Plumbing Claims As Investors Weigh Valuation And Risks

Three Mile Island Delays Test Constellation Energy’s Nuclear Growth And Valuation

The Bull Case for Constellation Energy: Here's Where It Could Be in 3 Years

Top Wind Energy Stocks to Buy For Long-Term Portfolio Gain

Defense ETFs in Spotlight Amid Fading Truce Hopes in the Middle East

Can KTOS Become a Key Player in US Space Force Ground Systems?

RTX's Missile Defense Capabilities: Key to Future Growth?

B-21 Budget Uncertainty Tests Northrop Grumman Valuation And Growth Story

IonQ, D-Wave, Rigetti stocks tumble as Mizuho slashes price targets by 25%

Rigetti Is Growing Sales of Quantum Computers. That’s Good for the Stock.

IonQ Strengthens Position With Strategic Government Contracts

Reaffirmed da Vinci Growth Guidance and New Platforms Could Be A Game Changer For Intuitive Surgical (ISRG)

Intuitive Surgical’s AI Push Tests Valuation And Da Vinci Growth Story

ISRG Stock Down Nearly 20% YTD: Should You Buy, Hold or Sell?

Block Jumps 6% as Strong Q4 Results, Job Cuts, Analyst Upgrades Reignite Investor Interest

Block Expands Restaurant Tools As Shares Trade Below Valuation Estimates

INTU's FedNow Integration: Will It Strengthen Its Competitive Edge?

Apple Pulls Down Jack Dorsey's Bitchat Messaging Service From China's App Store For Containing 'Illegal' Content

Johnson & Johnson PFA Launch Puts VARIPULSE Pro And Valuation In Focus

Morgan Stanley Maintains Overweight on Johnson & Johnson, Raises Price Target to $267

Biopharma Stocks Largely Exempt From Pharma Tariffs, BofA Says

Meta's Latest $21 Billion Move Could Help De-Risk CoreWeave's Growth: Analyst

Jim Cramer's 'Hardware-Only' Trade: Marvell And Intel Surge As Software Stocks Sink

MATCH Act Puts ASML China Revenue And Service Exposure Under Spotlight

OpenAI Stargate Leaders Depart in Latest Shakeup to Data Center Strategy

'Powell, Bessent discussed Anthropic's Mythos AI cyber threat with major U.S. banks' - CNBC

Material evolution of the existing AI narrative is continuing: the market is narrowing further from broad AI enthusiasm into a harder infrastructure-and-control story, but with a new wrinkle—execution and governance risk around data-center buildouts is now entering the narrative alongside demand strength. Meta/CoreWeave de-risking supports capacity owners, while Stargate leadership turnover and AI cyber-risk warnings suggest not every AI capex story is equally bankable. This is not a reversal; it is a more selective, higher-quality filter within AI.

Builder Stocks Jump on Cease-Fire. A Tough Year Could Be Turning Around.

Toll Brothers Stock Could Lead Homebuilder Rebound as Housing Stabilizes

D R Horton Faces Plumbing Claims As Investors Weigh Valuation And Risks

Three Mile Island Delays Test Constellation Energy’s Nuclear Growth And Valuation

The Bull Case for Constellation Energy: Here's Where It Could Be in 3 Years

Defense ETFs in Spotlight Amid Fading Truce Hopes in the Middle East

Can KTOS Become a Key Player in US Space Force Ground Systems?

RTX's Missile Defense Capabilities: Key to Future Growth?

B-21 Budget Uncertainty Tests Northrop Grumman Valuation And Growth Story

IonQ, D-Wave, Rigetti stocks tumble as Mizuho slashes price targets by 25%

Rigetti Is Growing Sales of Quantum Computers. That’s Good for the Stock.

IonQ Strengthens Position With Strategic Government Contracts

Intuitive Surgical’s AI Push Tests Valuation And Da Vinci Growth Story

Biopharma Stocks Largely Exempt From Pharma Tariffs, BofA Says

Block Jumps 6% as Strong Q4 Results, Job Cuts, Analyst Upgrades Reignite Investor Interest

Block Expands Restaurant Tools As Shares Trade Below Valuation Estimates

Johnson & Johnson PFA Launch Puts VARIPULSE Pro And Valuation In Focus

Morgan Stanley Maintains Overweight on Johnson & Johnson, Raises Price Target to $267

AI capex is increasingly benefiting physical infrastructure owners over software layers: chips, opticals, cloud capacity, and power remain favored while software/app names face repricing and cyber/governance scrutiny.

Geopolitical de-escalation helped rates-sensitive housing, but fading truce hopes are simultaneously re-supporting defense demand—macro relief is uneven rather than broad.

Government involvement is rising across frontier tech: export controls hit semiconductor equipment, EU scrutiny targets generative AI, and AI cyber-risk discussions with banks raise the policy premium on trusted infrastructure.

Healthcare and defensive pharma/medtech are quietly gaining relative narrative strength as tariff exemption and product-cycle news offer cleaner earnings visibility than crowded AI beta.

Summary: Narrative tone is mildly positive but selective. The dominant story remains AI narrowing, not breaking: infrastructure owners keep winning, yet the market is becoming more discriminating about which AI buildouts are credible as policy, cyber-risk, and execution concerns rise. That is the session’s key narrative shift. Real estate retains a fragile rates-relief rebound narrative from the prior session, while defense is re-firming as cease-fire optimism fades. Energy grid remains strategically important but near-term execution issues, especially around nuclear timelines, cap enthusiasm. Quantum stays noisy and speculative with no fresh narrative upgrade. Healthcare/defensive assets are improving quietly on product and policy insulation, offering a cleaner relative story than consensus AI beta.

AI remains the strongest selective growth narrative despite the BEAR regime. A genuine narrative shift is still in force: leadership is narrowing toward infrastructure, chips, foundry capacity, and compute owners rather than broad software beta. Macro is mildly supportive rather than hostile, and quant confirmation is decent with positive 6m momentum (+9.82%) and positive relative strength vs SPY (+3.3), led by TSM/ASML/NVDA/AMD. This looks like a quality-filtered AI trade, not a broken one.

The macro regime is still BEAR and persistent, which caps upside for high-multiple tech. Recent headlines add policy and execution risk: ASML/China exposure, EU regulation, Stargate leadership turnover, and AI cyber-risk scrutiny. Quant confirmation is mixed because 3m momentum has slipped negative (-1.82%) and several mega-cap software/platform names are lagging. This could remain a bifurcated market where only a subset of AI names works.

Narrative tone has improved modestly around housing stabilization and a possible builder rebound, with some positive catalysts for TOL and broader builder sentiment. Parts of the sleeve such as O, SPG, and AMT show solid relative strength, suggesting income-oriented real estate is holding up better than homebuilder beta.

Macro remains a clear headwind: restrictive rates, sticky inflation, and weaker consumer sentiment directly pressure affordability and demand. Quant trends do not confirm a durable turn, with theme-average 6m momentum at -8.9%, 3m at -2.49%, and relative strength vs SPY at -4.94. The rebound narrative is still fragile and too narrow to justify increasing conviction from the floor.

The long-term structural case remains intact: AI power demand, grid modernization, and nuclear/utility investment still provide a durable secular backdrop. There are pockets of strong quant leadership in GEV and NEE, and some positive narrative support remains for long-duration power infrastructure.

This is exactly the kind of theme previously vetoed on risk grounds, and the key condition has not improved enough. Macro is mildly negative, narrative is only slightly positive, and quants are unstable: 3m momentum is negative (-4.53), relative strength is roughly flat to negative (-0.52), volatility is high (59.78), and SMR portfolio drawdown remains extreme at -20.9%, worse than prior veto sessions. With unresolved breach-level drawdown, I cannot re-press the bullish case yet.

Defense is one of the cleanest relative winners in this tape. Macro is near-neutral to mildly supportive because the sector is less cyclical in a BEAR regime, while narrative support is solid from fading truce hopes and continued missile/space-system demand. Quant confirmation is strong: theme-average 6m momentum +22.13%, 3m +18.9%, and positive relative strength. Most core primes show strong Sharpe ratios and manageable volatility, making this a high-quality offensive-defensive exposure.

The main caution is stock-specific risk inside the sleeve, especially PLTR, whose portfolio drawdown remains deeply impaired (-20.73%) and was a prior veto flag. Budget uncertainty around programs like B-21 also tempers enthusiasm. So while the theme is strong, position construction inside the basket matters and prevents a more aggressive increase.

There is still a speculative long-term upside case through government contracts and incremental commercialization, and GOOG provides one stabilizing anchor in the basket. If risk appetite returns, this sleeve can rebound violently from depressed levels.

This remains one of the weakest themes on the board. Macro is a clear headwind for high-duration speculative tech, narrative is slightly negative, and quants are poor: 3m momentum -24.95%, relative strength -25.77, volatility 64.89, HHI 0.3061, and extreme VaR across key names. Prior sessions explicitly vetoed increases here, and those conditions have not improved. The correct stance is still maximum caution.

This theme has a quietly improving fundamental and narrative backdrop. Macro is mildly supportive, tariff/policy insulation helps, and medtech/product-cycle news is constructive. Narrative score is one of the better readings (+0.24), suggesting healthcare is gaining relative story strength as investors look for cleaner earnings visibility than crowded AI beta.

The quant tape is not confirming yet. Theme-average 3m momentum is -7.3% and relative strength vs SPY is weak at -14.16, with notable drag from NVO and ISRG. This looks more like an emerging relative idea than an active breakout, so I would not raise conviction until price action improves.

There are isolated positive company-level catalysts, especially around Block/XYZ, and the broader digital-finance adoption story is not dead. In a different regime, this sleeve could recover quickly given how washed out positioning appears.

The macro regime is directly hostile to speculative liquidity-sensitive assets, and the quant profile is still very poor: 6m momentum -38.28%, 3m -20.11%, relative strength -14.38, volatility 67.78, HHI 0.3061, and extreme daily VaR across the sleeve. Prior vetoes specifically cited crypto risk, and those conditions remain unresolved. Mildly positive headlines are nowhere near enough to offset the risk structure.

This is the cleanest macro-aligned theme in the portfolio. In a persistent BEAR regime with sticky inflation and weaker sentiment, defensives should continue to attract capital. Narrative is quietly constructive, and quants are excellent for a hedge sleeve: 6m momentum +17.86%, 3m +12.81%, relative strength +8.91, low volatility (17.75), low VaR, and shallow portfolio drawdowns. JNJ and GLD are especially strong anchors.

The main risk is crowding and opportunity cost if the market abruptly rotates back into cyclicals or growth. TLT and PG are weaker components, and at conviction 9 there is less room for incremental informational edge. Still, the evidence supports taking the final step to max conviction.

Bullish-leaning analyst bias applied selectively: I looked for reasons to add conviction, but prior veto history and unresolved drawdown/concentration breaches kept me disciplined in energy_grid, quantum, and crypto_digital.

Summary: I am selectively adding risk only where narrative and quants align despite the BEAR regime. The best adds are defensive and defense_aerospace, with ai_compute also deserving a modest increase because the AI narrative shift remains constructive for infrastructure winners. I am explicitly avoiding re-proposing bullish adds in themes that were recently vetoed for unresolved risk conditions, especially energy_grid, quantum, and crypto_digital. Real_estate and biotech_health have improving stories but insufficient price confirmation for a conviction increase today.

Theme-average volatility is 40.66%, high for a BEAR regime.

Several holdings exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold: NVDA -3.46%, AMD -4.24%, AVGO -3.75%, TSM -3.05%, SMCI -6.40%, ASML -3.72%.

Momentum is deteriorating at the theme level: 3m average is -1.82% despite 6m average of 9.82%, indicating loss of near-term trend support.

Macro backdrop is only mildly supportive (+0.18 impact) but higher-for-longer rates still pressure high-multiple tech.

Macro headwind is strong at -0.42, the worst among major cyclical themes, due to rate sensitivity under restrictive Fed policy.

Theme momentum is weak: 6m average -8.90% and 3m average -2.49%.

Relative strength is negative at -4.94 vs SPY, showing persistent underperformance.

Multiple names exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold: DHI -3.36%, LEN -3.52%, RKT -4.90%.

LEN portfolio drawdown is -7.06%, moving uncomfortably close to the theme max-drawdown limit of 10%.

Live realized drawdown breach remains active: SMR portfolio drawdown is -20.90%, exceeding the theme max-drawdown limit of 12%.

Theme-average volatility is 59.78%, far above a moderate-risk sleeve.

Multiple holdings have extreme daily VaR above threshold: CEG -4.41%, FSLR -4.57%, SMR -9.78%, UEC -7.05%, GEV -4.03%.

Near-term momentum is negative: 3m theme average -4.53%, with severe weakness in SMR (-41.93%) and FSLR (-20.98%).

Macro impact is negative (-0.15) and prior session breach has not healed.

Live realized drawdown breach remains active: PLTR portfolio drawdown is -20.73%, exceeding the theme max-drawdown limit of 10%.

PLTR also carries a daily VaR of -5.82%, well above the 3% threshold, injecting speculative risk into an otherwise defensive-leaning sleeve.

Theme conviction is already high at 4 with max allocation 12%, limiting room for error while one constituent is materially impaired.

Although theme momentum is strong overall (6m 22.13%, 3m 18.90%), the unresolved PLTR loss means realized capital risk remains elevated.

Concentration risk is excessive: HHI 0.3061 exceeds the 0.25 threshold.

Theme-average volatility is 64.89%, extremely high.

Daily VaR is far above threshold across the sleeve: IONQ -7.99%, RGTI -8.78%, IBM -3.03%.

Theme momentum is collapsing: 3m average -24.95%, with IONQ -37.05% and RGTI -39.97%.

Relative strength is deeply negative at -25.77 vs SPY.

Portfolio drawdowns remain material from entry: IONQ -13.77%, RGTI -8.72%, IBM -6.64%.

Macro headwind is strong at -0.33 in a persistent BEAR regime, a double flag with weak momentum.

Theme-average volatility is 42.37%, high for a moderate-risk sleeve.

Several holdings exceed the 3% daily VaR threshold: LLY -3.36%, NVO -4.08%, CRSP -5.87%.

Theme 3m momentum is negative at -7.30% and relative strength is weak at -14.16 vs SPY.

NVO has sharply negative 6m momentum (-28.58%) and negative Sharpe (-0.739), while ISRG Sharpe is also negative (-0.325).

Macro impact is mildly positive (+0.12), but price action does not confirm a defensive bid across the sleeve.

Theme-average volatility is 67.78%, extremely high.

All holdings have daily VaR far above the 3% threshold: COIN -6.48%, MSTR -6.99%, MARA -7.71%, XYZ -4.86%.

Momentum is decisively negative: 6m average -38.28% and 3m average -20.11%.

Portfolio drawdown in COIN is -15.92%, approaching the theme max-drawdown limit of 20%, while MSTR is already -7.44%.

Macro impact is strongly negative (-0.38) in a persistent BEAR regime, a direct headwind to speculative liquidity-sensitive assets.

This is the strongest diversifying sleeve in the current regime: macro impact +0.34, 6m momentum 17.86%, 3m momentum 12.81%, and relative strength +8.91 vs SPY.

Theme-average volatility is only 17.75%, the lowest among growth-sensitive sleeves.

No holding breaches the 3% daily VaR threshold; highest is GLD at -2.73%.

Portfolio drawdowns are minimal across the sleeve, all well inside the 5% theme max-drawdown limit.

Energy_grid breach remains active: SMR portfolio drawdown -20.90% exceeds theme max-drawdown limit 12%.

Defense_aerospace breach remains active: PLTR portfolio drawdown -20.73% exceeds theme max-drawdown limit 10%.

Quantum sleeve remains under entry stress: IONQ -13.77%, RGTI -8.72%, IBM -6.64%.

Crypto_digital sleeve remains under entry stress: COIN -15.92%, MSTR -7.44%.

Summary: Risk posture is still defensive. The portfolio is not suffering from cross-theme correlation concentration, but that is outweighed by persistent BEAR-regime conditions, unresolved realized drawdown breaches, and concentrated high-VaR speculative sleeves. The key issue is not broad market volatility alone; it is that prior flagged problem areas have not healed: SMR and PLTR remain breach-level losses versus their theme drawdown limits, while quantum and crypto_digital still combine excessive HHI concentration with extreme daily loss potential and weak momentum. AI is not a veto driver by itself, but it is not clean enough to add aggressively in this tape. Defensive exposure should be maintained at no less than conviction 3, and any action this session should be limited to reductions, exits, or hedges rather than conviction increases.

Summary: VETOED: Portfolio-level risk remains in veto territory. The regime has flipped back to BEAR with 52% confidence, 21-day persistence, and a 0.98 BEAR->BEAR continuation probability. Prior veto conditions are still unresolved and in some cases worsening: energy_grid still has a live realized drawdown breach in SMR at -20.90% versus the theme max-drawdown limit of 12%, and defense_aerospace still has PLTR at -20.73% versus the 10% limit. Concentration risk remains excessive in quantum and crypto_digital (HHI 0.3061 > 0.25 in both), while both sleeves continue to carry extreme daily VaR well above the 3% threshold (quantum: IONQ -7.99%, RGTI -8.78%, IBM -3.03%; crypto_digital: COIN -6.48%, MSTR -6.99%, MARA -7.71%, XYZ -4.86%). In a persistent BEAR regime with sticky inflation and restrictive policy, these unresolved breach-level losses plus concentrated speculative exposure make any conviction increase imprudent this session.. Only conviction decreases applied.

Summary: 21 orders, 8 risk exits, 8 sells, 5 buys, turnover 5.48%, regime sizing 50%